Protocol for field testing of tall buildings to determine envelope air leakage rate

William P. Bahnfleth, Grenville K. Yuill, Brian W. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this project was to develop a relatively simple, accurate method for testing the overall envelope leakage rate of tall buildings. Two fan pressurization test techniques, the floor-by-floor blower door method and the air-handler method, were developed and tested on two buildings. Criteria for conducting accurate tests were developed, including limitations on outdoor air temperature and wind speed. The floor-by-floor blower door method permits isolation and measurement of the leakage flow rate of a single floor, but it is difficult and time-consuming to apply. The air-handler method uses building air distribution fans for pressurization. It is most easily applied on a system-by-system level rather than floor-by-floor. Fan airflow techniques including orifice plate, pitot traverse, and tracer gas dilution were considered. The tracer gas method was found to be relatively easy to apply and highly accurate. Fan airflow rate measurement uncertainty by tracer gas was estimated to be 5.4% to 8.8% for the cases considered, assuming a 5% uncertainty in interzonal leakage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalASHRAE Transactions
Volume105
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999
EventASHRAE Annual Meeting - Seattle, WA, USA
Duration: Jun 18 1999Jun 23 1999

Fingerprint

Tall buildings
Leakage (fluid)
Testing
Fans
Air
Blowers
Pressurization
Gases
Orifices
Dilution
Flow rate

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Building and Construction
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

@article{013072ca9c1a493cb68c81a379f9eac0,
title = "Protocol for field testing of tall buildings to determine envelope air leakage rate",
abstract = "The objective of this project was to develop a relatively simple, accurate method for testing the overall envelope leakage rate of tall buildings. Two fan pressurization test techniques, the floor-by-floor blower door method and the air-handler method, were developed and tested on two buildings. Criteria for conducting accurate tests were developed, including limitations on outdoor air temperature and wind speed. The floor-by-floor blower door method permits isolation and measurement of the leakage flow rate of a single floor, but it is difficult and time-consuming to apply. The air-handler method uses building air distribution fans for pressurization. It is most easily applied on a system-by-system level rather than floor-by-floor. Fan airflow techniques including orifice plate, pitot traverse, and tracer gas dilution were considered. The tracer gas method was found to be relatively easy to apply and highly accurate. Fan airflow rate measurement uncertainty by tracer gas was estimated to be 5.4{\%} to 8.8{\%} for the cases considered, assuming a 5{\%} uncertainty in interzonal leakage.",
author = "Bahnfleth, {William P.} and Yuill, {Grenville K.} and Lee, {Brian W.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
journal = "ASHRAE Transactions",
issn = "0001-2505",
publisher = "Amer. Soc. Heating, Ref. Air-Conditoning Eng. Inc.",

}

Protocol for field testing of tall buildings to determine envelope air leakage rate. / Bahnfleth, William P.; Yuill, Grenville K.; Lee, Brian W.

In: ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 105, 01.12.1999.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protocol for field testing of tall buildings to determine envelope air leakage rate

AU - Bahnfleth, William P.

AU - Yuill, Grenville K.

AU - Lee, Brian W.

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - The objective of this project was to develop a relatively simple, accurate method for testing the overall envelope leakage rate of tall buildings. Two fan pressurization test techniques, the floor-by-floor blower door method and the air-handler method, were developed and tested on two buildings. Criteria for conducting accurate tests were developed, including limitations on outdoor air temperature and wind speed. The floor-by-floor blower door method permits isolation and measurement of the leakage flow rate of a single floor, but it is difficult and time-consuming to apply. The air-handler method uses building air distribution fans for pressurization. It is most easily applied on a system-by-system level rather than floor-by-floor. Fan airflow techniques including orifice plate, pitot traverse, and tracer gas dilution were considered. The tracer gas method was found to be relatively easy to apply and highly accurate. Fan airflow rate measurement uncertainty by tracer gas was estimated to be 5.4% to 8.8% for the cases considered, assuming a 5% uncertainty in interzonal leakage.

AB - The objective of this project was to develop a relatively simple, accurate method for testing the overall envelope leakage rate of tall buildings. Two fan pressurization test techniques, the floor-by-floor blower door method and the air-handler method, were developed and tested on two buildings. Criteria for conducting accurate tests were developed, including limitations on outdoor air temperature and wind speed. The floor-by-floor blower door method permits isolation and measurement of the leakage flow rate of a single floor, but it is difficult and time-consuming to apply. The air-handler method uses building air distribution fans for pressurization. It is most easily applied on a system-by-system level rather than floor-by-floor. Fan airflow techniques including orifice plate, pitot traverse, and tracer gas dilution were considered. The tracer gas method was found to be relatively easy to apply and highly accurate. Fan airflow rate measurement uncertainty by tracer gas was estimated to be 5.4% to 8.8% for the cases considered, assuming a 5% uncertainty in interzonal leakage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033319369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033319369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:0033319369

VL - 105

JO - ASHRAE Transactions

JF - ASHRAE Transactions

SN - 0001-2505

ER -