Pseudosecure vs. individuated-secure client attachment to therapist: Implications for therapy process and outcome

Brent Mallinckrodt, Mary Z. Anderson, Gahee Choi, Kenneth Levy, Katja Petrowski, Eric M. Sauer, Orya Tishby, Hadas Wiseman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We differentiated two hypothesized client subtypes: (a) Pseudosecure clients have high Client Attachment to Therapist Scale (CATS) Secure and high CATS Preoccupied scores, tend to idealize their therapist, and exhibit maladaptive dependency; (b) Individuated-secure clients combine high Secure with low Preoccupied scores and function more autonomously. Clients who, despite insecure attachment to others, “earn” individuated-secure attachment to their therapist benefit most from therapy. Method: We examined regression suppressor effects by reanalyzing raw data from four published studies. If pseudosecure attachment is present, when covariance between CATS Secure and Preoccupied scores is removed, residual Secure scores should be significantly better predictors of process/outcome indicators than raw Secure scores. Results: Suppressor effects were observed in eight of nine analyses. Two were statistically significant. Earned individuated-secure attachment predicted improvement in interpersonal relationship symptoms, but only for clients with Avoidant pre-therapy attachment patterns. Finally, significant meta-analytic effect size estimates were obtained for CATS subscales, Secure r =.274 (95% CI =.177,.366), Avoidant, r = −.296 (95% CI = −.392, −193), and Preoccupied, r = −.192 (95% CI = −.289, −.092). Conclusions: Clients with pre-therapy Avoidant attachment who nevertheless “earn” individuated-secure attachment to their therapist appear to benefit more from therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)677-691
Number of pages15
JournalPsychotherapy Research
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2 2017

Fingerprint

Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Mallinckrodt, Brent ; Anderson, Mary Z. ; Choi, Gahee ; Levy, Kenneth ; Petrowski, Katja ; Sauer, Eric M. ; Tishby, Orya ; Wiseman, Hadas. / Pseudosecure vs. individuated-secure client attachment to therapist : Implications for therapy process and outcome. In: Psychotherapy Research. 2017 ; Vol. 27, No. 6. pp. 677-691.
@article{f6b34aa0a244414e98e30b28ff4a3ef6,
title = "Pseudosecure vs. individuated-secure client attachment to therapist: Implications for therapy process and outcome†",
abstract = "Objective: We differentiated two hypothesized client subtypes: (a) Pseudosecure clients have high Client Attachment to Therapist Scale (CATS) Secure and high CATS Preoccupied scores, tend to idealize their therapist, and exhibit maladaptive dependency; (b) Individuated-secure clients combine high Secure with low Preoccupied scores and function more autonomously. Clients who, despite insecure attachment to others, “earn” individuated-secure attachment to their therapist benefit most from therapy. Method: We examined regression suppressor effects by reanalyzing raw data from four published studies. If pseudosecure attachment is present, when covariance between CATS Secure and Preoccupied scores is removed, residual Secure scores should be significantly better predictors of process/outcome indicators than raw Secure scores. Results: Suppressor effects were observed in eight of nine analyses. Two were statistically significant. Earned individuated-secure attachment predicted improvement in interpersonal relationship symptoms, but only for clients with Avoidant pre-therapy attachment patterns. Finally, significant meta-analytic effect size estimates were obtained for CATS subscales, Secure r =.274 (95{\%} CI =.177,.366), Avoidant, r = −.296 (95{\%} CI = −.392, −193), and Preoccupied, r = −.192 (95{\%} CI = −.289, −.092). Conclusions: Clients with pre-therapy Avoidant attachment who nevertheless “earn” individuated-secure attachment to their therapist appear to benefit more from therapy.",
author = "Brent Mallinckrodt and Anderson, {Mary Z.} and Gahee Choi and Kenneth Levy and Katja Petrowski and Sauer, {Eric M.} and Orya Tishby and Hadas Wiseman",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10503307.2016.1152411",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "677--691",
journal = "Psychotherapy Research",
issn = "1050-3307",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

Mallinckrodt, B, Anderson, MZ, Choi, G, Levy, K, Petrowski, K, Sauer, EM, Tishby, O & Wiseman, H 2017, 'Pseudosecure vs. individuated-secure client attachment to therapist: Implications for therapy process and outcome', Psychotherapy Research, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 677-691. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2016.1152411

Pseudosecure vs. individuated-secure client attachment to therapist : Implications for therapy process and outcome. / Mallinckrodt, Brent; Anderson, Mary Z.; Choi, Gahee; Levy, Kenneth; Petrowski, Katja; Sauer, Eric M.; Tishby, Orya; Wiseman, Hadas.

In: Psychotherapy Research, Vol. 27, No. 6, 02.11.2017, p. 677-691.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pseudosecure vs. individuated-secure client attachment to therapist

T2 - Implications for therapy process and outcome†

AU - Mallinckrodt, Brent

AU - Anderson, Mary Z.

AU - Choi, Gahee

AU - Levy, Kenneth

AU - Petrowski, Katja

AU - Sauer, Eric M.

AU - Tishby, Orya

AU - Wiseman, Hadas

PY - 2017/11/2

Y1 - 2017/11/2

N2 - Objective: We differentiated two hypothesized client subtypes: (a) Pseudosecure clients have high Client Attachment to Therapist Scale (CATS) Secure and high CATS Preoccupied scores, tend to idealize their therapist, and exhibit maladaptive dependency; (b) Individuated-secure clients combine high Secure with low Preoccupied scores and function more autonomously. Clients who, despite insecure attachment to others, “earn” individuated-secure attachment to their therapist benefit most from therapy. Method: We examined regression suppressor effects by reanalyzing raw data from four published studies. If pseudosecure attachment is present, when covariance between CATS Secure and Preoccupied scores is removed, residual Secure scores should be significantly better predictors of process/outcome indicators than raw Secure scores. Results: Suppressor effects were observed in eight of nine analyses. Two were statistically significant. Earned individuated-secure attachment predicted improvement in interpersonal relationship symptoms, but only for clients with Avoidant pre-therapy attachment patterns. Finally, significant meta-analytic effect size estimates were obtained for CATS subscales, Secure r =.274 (95% CI =.177,.366), Avoidant, r = −.296 (95% CI = −.392, −193), and Preoccupied, r = −.192 (95% CI = −.289, −.092). Conclusions: Clients with pre-therapy Avoidant attachment who nevertheless “earn” individuated-secure attachment to their therapist appear to benefit more from therapy.

AB - Objective: We differentiated two hypothesized client subtypes: (a) Pseudosecure clients have high Client Attachment to Therapist Scale (CATS) Secure and high CATS Preoccupied scores, tend to idealize their therapist, and exhibit maladaptive dependency; (b) Individuated-secure clients combine high Secure with low Preoccupied scores and function more autonomously. Clients who, despite insecure attachment to others, “earn” individuated-secure attachment to their therapist benefit most from therapy. Method: We examined regression suppressor effects by reanalyzing raw data from four published studies. If pseudosecure attachment is present, when covariance between CATS Secure and Preoccupied scores is removed, residual Secure scores should be significantly better predictors of process/outcome indicators than raw Secure scores. Results: Suppressor effects were observed in eight of nine analyses. Two were statistically significant. Earned individuated-secure attachment predicted improvement in interpersonal relationship symptoms, but only for clients with Avoidant pre-therapy attachment patterns. Finally, significant meta-analytic effect size estimates were obtained for CATS subscales, Secure r =.274 (95% CI =.177,.366), Avoidant, r = −.296 (95% CI = −.392, −193), and Preoccupied, r = −.192 (95% CI = −.289, −.092). Conclusions: Clients with pre-therapy Avoidant attachment who nevertheless “earn” individuated-secure attachment to their therapist appear to benefit more from therapy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961615800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961615800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10503307.2016.1152411

DO - 10.1080/10503307.2016.1152411

M3 - Article

C2 - 27013069

AN - SCOPUS:84961615800

VL - 27

SP - 677

EP - 691

JO - Psychotherapy Research

JF - Psychotherapy Research

SN - 1050-3307

IS - 6

ER -