Psychometric properties of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Hong Psychological Reactance Scale (HPRS; Hong & Felda, 1996) was developed to measure the individual difference in reactance proneness, that is, a person's trait propensity to experience psychological reactance. We performed confirmatory factor analyses to test the dimensionality of the 11-item version of the HPRS. Three message outcome variables (i.e., perceived threat to freedom, attitude, and intention) served as reference variables to test the construct validity of the HPRS. Data from 3 studies (Ns = 188, 200, and 233) of reactions to persuasive health messages confirmed the existence of 4 first-order factors but also provided evidence that the HPRS can be treated as unidimensional at the second order. The relationships between the second-order factor and the message outcome variables provided evidence of the validity of the scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-81
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume85
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2005

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Psychology
Individuality
Statistical Factor Analysis
Health
Psychological

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

@article{147fdf2428fb4fccb5f6aa405dc9d396,
title = "Psychometric properties of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale",
abstract = "The Hong Psychological Reactance Scale (HPRS; Hong & Felda, 1996) was developed to measure the individual difference in reactance proneness, that is, a person's trait propensity to experience psychological reactance. We performed confirmatory factor analyses to test the dimensionality of the 11-item version of the HPRS. Three message outcome variables (i.e., perceived threat to freedom, attitude, and intention) served as reference variables to test the construct validity of the HPRS. Data from 3 studies (Ns = 188, 200, and 233) of reactions to persuasive health messages confirmed the existence of 4 first-order factors but also provided evidence that the HPRS can be treated as unidimensional at the second order. The relationships between the second-order factor and the message outcome variables provided evidence of the validity of the scale.",
author = "Lijiang Shen and Dillard, {James Price}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_07",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "74--81",
journal = "Journal of Personality Assessment",
issn = "0022-3891",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Psychometric properties of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale. / Shen, Lijiang; Dillard, James Price.

In: Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 85, No. 1, 08.2005, p. 74-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric properties of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale

AU - Shen, Lijiang

AU - Dillard, James Price

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - The Hong Psychological Reactance Scale (HPRS; Hong & Felda, 1996) was developed to measure the individual difference in reactance proneness, that is, a person's trait propensity to experience psychological reactance. We performed confirmatory factor analyses to test the dimensionality of the 11-item version of the HPRS. Three message outcome variables (i.e., perceived threat to freedom, attitude, and intention) served as reference variables to test the construct validity of the HPRS. Data from 3 studies (Ns = 188, 200, and 233) of reactions to persuasive health messages confirmed the existence of 4 first-order factors but also provided evidence that the HPRS can be treated as unidimensional at the second order. The relationships between the second-order factor and the message outcome variables provided evidence of the validity of the scale.

AB - The Hong Psychological Reactance Scale (HPRS; Hong & Felda, 1996) was developed to measure the individual difference in reactance proneness, that is, a person's trait propensity to experience psychological reactance. We performed confirmatory factor analyses to test the dimensionality of the 11-item version of the HPRS. Three message outcome variables (i.e., perceived threat to freedom, attitude, and intention) served as reference variables to test the construct validity of the HPRS. Data from 3 studies (Ns = 188, 200, and 233) of reactions to persuasive health messages confirmed the existence of 4 first-order factors but also provided evidence that the HPRS can be treated as unidimensional at the second order. The relationships between the second-order factor and the message outcome variables provided evidence of the validity of the scale.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23044471649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23044471649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_07

DO - 10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_07

M3 - Article

C2 - 16083386

AN - SCOPUS:23044471649

VL - 85

SP - 74

EP - 81

JO - Journal of Personality Assessment

JF - Journal of Personality Assessment

SN - 0022-3891

IS - 1

ER -