Psychopathology as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Alcoholics

Bruce J. Rounsaville, Zelig S. Dolinsky, Thomas F. Babor, Roger Meyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

554 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We performed a one-year follow-up study of 266 alcoholics who had received extensive psychiatric assessment, including diagnosis with the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule and DSM-III criteria, during their index treatment episode. The aims were to (1) evaluate the relationship between additional DSM-III diagnoses in alcoholics and outcome at follow-up, (2) assess the relative prognostic power of different ways of measuring psychopathology by comparing categorical DSM-III diagnoses and a global symptom severity measure, and (3) assess whether ratings of psychopathology add to the prognostic power of an alcoholdependence measure. While coexistent psychiatric diagnoses generally predicted poorer treatment outcome, there were significant interactions in the relationship between diagnoses and treatment outcome for men and women. For men, having an additional diagnosis of major depression, antisocial personality, or drug abuse was associated with poorer outcome. For women, having major depression was associated with a better outcome in drinking-related measures, while antisocial personality and drug abuse were associated with poorer prognosis. The value of determining psychiatric diagnosis was supported by covariance analyses that suggested that prognostic significance of specific disorders was not accounted for by general psychopathology or general dependence dimensions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)505-513
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of General Psychiatry
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1987

Fingerprint

Alcoholics
Psychopathology
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Antisocial Personality Disorder
Mental Disorders
Substance-Related Disorders
Depression
National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Drinking
Psychiatry
Appointments and Schedules
Treatment Outcome
Predictors
Interviews
Power (Psychology)
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Rounsaville, Bruce J. ; Dolinsky, Zelig S. ; Babor, Thomas F. ; Meyer, Roger. / Psychopathology as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Alcoholics. In: Archives of General Psychiatry. 1987 ; Vol. 44, No. 6. pp. 505-513.
@article{b9de491ac65142e0ba2e0ca7b32873cf,
title = "Psychopathology as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Alcoholics",
abstract = "We performed a one-year follow-up study of 266 alcoholics who had received extensive psychiatric assessment, including diagnosis with the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule and DSM-III criteria, during their index treatment episode. The aims were to (1) evaluate the relationship between additional DSM-III diagnoses in alcoholics and outcome at follow-up, (2) assess the relative prognostic power of different ways of measuring psychopathology by comparing categorical DSM-III diagnoses and a global symptom severity measure, and (3) assess whether ratings of psychopathology add to the prognostic power of an alcoholdependence measure. While coexistent psychiatric diagnoses generally predicted poorer treatment outcome, there were significant interactions in the relationship between diagnoses and treatment outcome for men and women. For men, having an additional diagnosis of major depression, antisocial personality, or drug abuse was associated with poorer outcome. For women, having major depression was associated with a better outcome in drinking-related measures, while antisocial personality and drug abuse were associated with poorer prognosis. The value of determining psychiatric diagnosis was supported by covariance analyses that suggested that prognostic significance of specific disorders was not accounted for by general psychopathology or general dependence dimensions.",
author = "Rounsaville, {Bruce J.} and Dolinsky, {Zelig S.} and Babor, {Thomas F.} and Roger Meyer",
year = "1987",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180015002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "505--513",
journal = "JAMA Psychiatry",
issn = "2168-622X",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "6",

}

Psychopathology as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Alcoholics. / Rounsaville, Bruce J.; Dolinsky, Zelig S.; Babor, Thomas F.; Meyer, Roger.

In: Archives of General Psychiatry, Vol. 44, No. 6, 01.01.1987, p. 505-513.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychopathology as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Alcoholics

AU - Rounsaville, Bruce J.

AU - Dolinsky, Zelig S.

AU - Babor, Thomas F.

AU - Meyer, Roger

PY - 1987/1/1

Y1 - 1987/1/1

N2 - We performed a one-year follow-up study of 266 alcoholics who had received extensive psychiatric assessment, including diagnosis with the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule and DSM-III criteria, during their index treatment episode. The aims were to (1) evaluate the relationship between additional DSM-III diagnoses in alcoholics and outcome at follow-up, (2) assess the relative prognostic power of different ways of measuring psychopathology by comparing categorical DSM-III diagnoses and a global symptom severity measure, and (3) assess whether ratings of psychopathology add to the prognostic power of an alcoholdependence measure. While coexistent psychiatric diagnoses generally predicted poorer treatment outcome, there were significant interactions in the relationship between diagnoses and treatment outcome for men and women. For men, having an additional diagnosis of major depression, antisocial personality, or drug abuse was associated with poorer outcome. For women, having major depression was associated with a better outcome in drinking-related measures, while antisocial personality and drug abuse were associated with poorer prognosis. The value of determining psychiatric diagnosis was supported by covariance analyses that suggested that prognostic significance of specific disorders was not accounted for by general psychopathology or general dependence dimensions.

AB - We performed a one-year follow-up study of 266 alcoholics who had received extensive psychiatric assessment, including diagnosis with the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule and DSM-III criteria, during their index treatment episode. The aims were to (1) evaluate the relationship between additional DSM-III diagnoses in alcoholics and outcome at follow-up, (2) assess the relative prognostic power of different ways of measuring psychopathology by comparing categorical DSM-III diagnoses and a global symptom severity measure, and (3) assess whether ratings of psychopathology add to the prognostic power of an alcoholdependence measure. While coexistent psychiatric diagnoses generally predicted poorer treatment outcome, there were significant interactions in the relationship between diagnoses and treatment outcome for men and women. For men, having an additional diagnosis of major depression, antisocial personality, or drug abuse was associated with poorer outcome. For women, having major depression was associated with a better outcome in drinking-related measures, while antisocial personality and drug abuse were associated with poorer prognosis. The value of determining psychiatric diagnosis was supported by covariance analyses that suggested that prognostic significance of specific disorders was not accounted for by general psychopathology or general dependence dimensions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023176663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023176663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180015002

DO - 10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180015002

M3 - Article

C2 - 3579499

AN - SCOPUS:0023176663

VL - 44

SP - 505

EP - 513

JO - JAMA Psychiatry

JF - JAMA Psychiatry

SN - 2168-622X

IS - 6

ER -