Public agricultural researchers: Reactions to organic, low input and sustainable agriculture

Aaron Harp, Carolyn Elizabeth Sachs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper offers a preliminary assessment of the reactions of public agricultural researchers to three terms used currently in the debate surrounding reduced input farming systems: organic, alternative, and sustainable agriculture. It is argued that these terms have been appropriated by the land grant system and their critical content removed to make them palatable to more mainstream agricultural researchers. A national sample of agricultural production researchers is explored, and disciplinary differences in attitudes toward the three terms are assessed. We conclude that sustainable and alternative agriculture do appear acceptable to the mainstream of production researchers, consistent with the hypothesis that they have been appropriated by the land grant system. Moreover, reasons why organic agriculture remains unacceptable are suggested.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-63
Number of pages6
JournalAgriculture and Human Values
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1992

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Public agricultural researchers: Reactions to organic, low input and sustainable agriculture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this