Quality of evidence in drug compendia supporting off-label use of typical and atypical antipsychotic medications

Richard P. Paczynski, G. Caleb Alexander, Vernon M. Chinchilli, Stefan P. Kruszewski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public and private payers use drug compendia to make coverage determinations, yet the quality of evidence they contain has received little scrutiny. We examined compendia citations regarding antipsychotic drugs, an important drug class given their substantial costs and widespread use. Nearly three-fold as many off-label indications were recommended for atypical as for typical agents, a difference that did not appear to be due to differences in quality of evidence for typical and atypical off-label indications. Given the important role that compendia play in evidence synthesis, coverage decisions, and ultimately, prescription utilization, these data suggest greater efforts are needed to improve the quality of evidence and transparency of evidence evaluations compendia contain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-146
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012

Fingerprint

Off-Label Use
Antipsychotic Agents
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Prescriptions
Costs and Cost Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{e1216952fee04f15b8266973110202c8,
title = "Quality of evidence in drug compendia supporting off-label use of typical and atypical antipsychotic medications",
abstract = "Public and private payers use drug compendia to make coverage determinations, yet the quality of evidence they contain has received little scrutiny. We examined compendia citations regarding antipsychotic drugs, an important drug class given their substantial costs and widespread use. Nearly three-fold as many off-label indications were recommended for atypical as for typical agents, a difference that did not appear to be due to differences in quality of evidence for typical and atypical off-label indications. Given the important role that compendia play in evidence synthesis, coverage decisions, and ultimately, prescription utilization, these data suggest greater efforts are needed to improve the quality of evidence and transparency of evidence evaluations compendia contain.",
author = "Paczynski, {Richard P.} and Alexander, {G. Caleb} and Chinchilli, {Vernon M.} and Kruszewski, {Stefan P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3233/JRS-2012-0567",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "137--146",
journal = "International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine",
issn = "0924-6479",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

Quality of evidence in drug compendia supporting off-label use of typical and atypical antipsychotic medications. / Paczynski, Richard P.; Alexander, G. Caleb; Chinchilli, Vernon M.; Kruszewski, Stefan P.

In: International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.10.2012, p. 137-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of evidence in drug compendia supporting off-label use of typical and atypical antipsychotic medications

AU - Paczynski, Richard P.

AU - Alexander, G. Caleb

AU - Chinchilli, Vernon M.

AU - Kruszewski, Stefan P.

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Public and private payers use drug compendia to make coverage determinations, yet the quality of evidence they contain has received little scrutiny. We examined compendia citations regarding antipsychotic drugs, an important drug class given their substantial costs and widespread use. Nearly three-fold as many off-label indications were recommended for atypical as for typical agents, a difference that did not appear to be due to differences in quality of evidence for typical and atypical off-label indications. Given the important role that compendia play in evidence synthesis, coverage decisions, and ultimately, prescription utilization, these data suggest greater efforts are needed to improve the quality of evidence and transparency of evidence evaluations compendia contain.

AB - Public and private payers use drug compendia to make coverage determinations, yet the quality of evidence they contain has received little scrutiny. We examined compendia citations regarding antipsychotic drugs, an important drug class given their substantial costs and widespread use. Nearly three-fold as many off-label indications were recommended for atypical as for typical agents, a difference that did not appear to be due to differences in quality of evidence for typical and atypical off-label indications. Given the important role that compendia play in evidence synthesis, coverage decisions, and ultimately, prescription utilization, these data suggest greater efforts are needed to improve the quality of evidence and transparency of evidence evaluations compendia contain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866642808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866642808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/JRS-2012-0567

DO - 10.3233/JRS-2012-0567

M3 - Article

C2 - 22936056

AN - SCOPUS:84866642808

VL - 24

SP - 137

EP - 146

JO - International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine

JF - International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine

SN - 0924-6479

IS - 3

ER -