Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk

Madhavan L. Raghavan, Baoshun Ma, Robert E. Harbaugh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

277 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Object. The authors investigated whether quantified shape or size indices could better discriminate between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Methods. Several custom algorithms were created to quantifiy the size and shape indices of intracranial aneurysms by using three-dimensional computerized tomography angiography models of the brain vasculature. Data from 27 patients with ruptured or unruptured aneurysms were evaluated in a blinded fashion to determine whether aneurysm size or shape better discriminated between the ruptured and unruptured groups. Five size and eight shape indices were calculated for each aneurysm. Two-tailed independent Student t-tests (significance p < 0.05) were used to determine statistically significant differences between ruptured and unruptured aneurysm groups for all 13 indices. Receiver-operating characteristic-area under curve analyses were performed for all indices to quantify the predictability of each index and to identify optimal threshold values. None of the five size indices were significantly different between the ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Five of the eight shape indices were significantly different between the two lesion groups, and two other shape indices showed a trend toward discriminating between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions. Quantified shape is more effective than size in discriminating between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Further investigation will determine whether quantified aneurysm shape will prove to be a reliable predictor of aneurysm rupture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)355-362
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of neurosurgery
Volume102
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2005

Fingerprint

Ruptured Aneurysm
Aneurysm
Rupture
Intracranial Aneurysm
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
Angiography
Tomography
Students
Brain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Raghavan, Madhavan L. ; Ma, Baoshun ; Harbaugh, Robert E. / Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. In: Journal of neurosurgery. 2005 ; Vol. 102, No. 2. pp. 355-362.
@article{df79a1201dfe461eb15ba3a47b8b1fe4,
title = "Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk",
abstract = "Object. The authors investigated whether quantified shape or size indices could better discriminate between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Methods. Several custom algorithms were created to quantifiy the size and shape indices of intracranial aneurysms by using three-dimensional computerized tomography angiography models of the brain vasculature. Data from 27 patients with ruptured or unruptured aneurysms were evaluated in a blinded fashion to determine whether aneurysm size or shape better discriminated between the ruptured and unruptured groups. Five size and eight shape indices were calculated for each aneurysm. Two-tailed independent Student t-tests (significance p < 0.05) were used to determine statistically significant differences between ruptured and unruptured aneurysm groups for all 13 indices. Receiver-operating characteristic-area under curve analyses were performed for all indices to quantify the predictability of each index and to identify optimal threshold values. None of the five size indices were significantly different between the ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Five of the eight shape indices were significantly different between the two lesion groups, and two other shape indices showed a trend toward discriminating between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions. Quantified shape is more effective than size in discriminating between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Further investigation will determine whether quantified aneurysm shape will prove to be a reliable predictor of aneurysm rupture.",
author = "Raghavan, {Madhavan L.} and Baoshun Ma and Harbaugh, {Robert E.}",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0355",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "355--362",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery",
issn = "0022-3085",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "2",

}

Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. / Raghavan, Madhavan L.; Ma, Baoshun; Harbaugh, Robert E.

In: Journal of neurosurgery, Vol. 102, No. 2, 01.02.2005, p. 355-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk

AU - Raghavan, Madhavan L.

AU - Ma, Baoshun

AU - Harbaugh, Robert E.

PY - 2005/2/1

Y1 - 2005/2/1

N2 - Object. The authors investigated whether quantified shape or size indices could better discriminate between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Methods. Several custom algorithms were created to quantifiy the size and shape indices of intracranial aneurysms by using three-dimensional computerized tomography angiography models of the brain vasculature. Data from 27 patients with ruptured or unruptured aneurysms were evaluated in a blinded fashion to determine whether aneurysm size or shape better discriminated between the ruptured and unruptured groups. Five size and eight shape indices were calculated for each aneurysm. Two-tailed independent Student t-tests (significance p < 0.05) were used to determine statistically significant differences between ruptured and unruptured aneurysm groups for all 13 indices. Receiver-operating characteristic-area under curve analyses were performed for all indices to quantify the predictability of each index and to identify optimal threshold values. None of the five size indices were significantly different between the ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Five of the eight shape indices were significantly different between the two lesion groups, and two other shape indices showed a trend toward discriminating between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions. Quantified shape is more effective than size in discriminating between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Further investigation will determine whether quantified aneurysm shape will prove to be a reliable predictor of aneurysm rupture.

AB - Object. The authors investigated whether quantified shape or size indices could better discriminate between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Methods. Several custom algorithms were created to quantifiy the size and shape indices of intracranial aneurysms by using three-dimensional computerized tomography angiography models of the brain vasculature. Data from 27 patients with ruptured or unruptured aneurysms were evaluated in a blinded fashion to determine whether aneurysm size or shape better discriminated between the ruptured and unruptured groups. Five size and eight shape indices were calculated for each aneurysm. Two-tailed independent Student t-tests (significance p < 0.05) were used to determine statistically significant differences between ruptured and unruptured aneurysm groups for all 13 indices. Receiver-operating characteristic-area under curve analyses were performed for all indices to quantify the predictability of each index and to identify optimal threshold values. None of the five size indices were significantly different between the ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Five of the eight shape indices were significantly different between the two lesion groups, and two other shape indices showed a trend toward discriminating between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions. Quantified shape is more effective than size in discriminating between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Further investigation will determine whether quantified aneurysm shape will prove to be a reliable predictor of aneurysm rupture.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14844323727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14844323727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0355

DO - 10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0355

M3 - Article

C2 - 15739566

AN - SCOPUS:14844323727

VL - 102

SP - 355

EP - 362

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery

SN - 0022-3085

IS - 2

ER -