Quantifying and valuing potential climate change impacts on coral reefs in the United States: Comparison of two scenarios

Diana R. Lane, Richard C. Ready, Robert W. Buddemeier, Jeremy A. Martinich, Kate Cardamone Shouse, Cameron W. Wobus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The biological and economic values of coral reefs are highly vulnerable to increasing atmospheric and ocean carbon dioxide concentrations. We applied the COMBO simulation model (COral Mortality and Bleaching Output) to three major U.S. locations for shallow water reefs: South Florida, Puerto Rico, and Hawaii. We compared estimates of future coral cover from 2000 to 2100 for a "business as usual" (BAU) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions scenario with a GHG mitigation policy scenario involving full international participation in reducing GHG emissions. We also calculated the economic value of changes in coral cover using a benefit transfer approach based on published studies of consumers' recreational values for snorkeling and diving on coral reefs as well as existence values for coral reefs. Our results suggest that a reduced emissions scenario would provide a large benefit to shallow water reefs in Hawaii by delaying or avoiding potential future bleaching events. For Hawaii, reducing emissions is projected to result in an estimated "avoided loss" from 2000 to 2100 of approximately $10.6 billion in recreational use values compared to a BAU scenario. However, reducing emissions is projected to provide only a minor economic benefit in Puerto Rico and South Florida, where sea-surface temperatures are already close to bleaching thresholds and coral cover is projected to drop well below 5% cover under both scenarios by 2050, and below 1% cover under both scenarios by 2100.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere82579
JournalPloS one
Volume8
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 31 2013

Fingerprint

Coral Reefs
Anthozoa
Reefs
Climate Change
Climate change
coral reefs
corals
bleaching
Hawaii
climate change
Puerto Rico
Bleaching
Greenhouse gases
Gases
Economics
greenhouse gas emissions
economic valuation
Oceans and Seas
reefs
Gas emissions

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Lane, D. R., Ready, R. C., Buddemeier, R. W., Martinich, J. A., Shouse, K. C., & Wobus, C. W. (2013). Quantifying and valuing potential climate change impacts on coral reefs in the United States: Comparison of two scenarios. PloS one, 8(12), [e82579]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082579
Lane, Diana R. ; Ready, Richard C. ; Buddemeier, Robert W. ; Martinich, Jeremy A. ; Shouse, Kate Cardamone ; Wobus, Cameron W. / Quantifying and valuing potential climate change impacts on coral reefs in the United States : Comparison of two scenarios. In: PloS one. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 12.
@article{da7419905ec44c67923e0e209df9d0c9,
title = "Quantifying and valuing potential climate change impacts on coral reefs in the United States: Comparison of two scenarios",
abstract = "The biological and economic values of coral reefs are highly vulnerable to increasing atmospheric and ocean carbon dioxide concentrations. We applied the COMBO simulation model (COral Mortality and Bleaching Output) to three major U.S. locations for shallow water reefs: South Florida, Puerto Rico, and Hawaii. We compared estimates of future coral cover from 2000 to 2100 for a {"}business as usual{"} (BAU) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions scenario with a GHG mitigation policy scenario involving full international participation in reducing GHG emissions. We also calculated the economic value of changes in coral cover using a benefit transfer approach based on published studies of consumers' recreational values for snorkeling and diving on coral reefs as well as existence values for coral reefs. Our results suggest that a reduced emissions scenario would provide a large benefit to shallow water reefs in Hawaii by delaying or avoiding potential future bleaching events. For Hawaii, reducing emissions is projected to result in an estimated {"}avoided loss{"} from 2000 to 2100 of approximately $10.6 billion in recreational use values compared to a BAU scenario. However, reducing emissions is projected to provide only a minor economic benefit in Puerto Rico and South Florida, where sea-surface temperatures are already close to bleaching thresholds and coral cover is projected to drop well below 5{\%} cover under both scenarios by 2050, and below 1{\%} cover under both scenarios by 2100.",
author = "Lane, {Diana R.} and Ready, {Richard C.} and Buddemeier, {Robert W.} and Martinich, {Jeremy A.} and Shouse, {Kate Cardamone} and Wobus, {Cameron W.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0082579",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "12",

}

Quantifying and valuing potential climate change impacts on coral reefs in the United States : Comparison of two scenarios. / Lane, Diana R.; Ready, Richard C.; Buddemeier, Robert W.; Martinich, Jeremy A.; Shouse, Kate Cardamone; Wobus, Cameron W.

In: PloS one, Vol. 8, No. 12, e82579, 31.12.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying and valuing potential climate change impacts on coral reefs in the United States

T2 - Comparison of two scenarios

AU - Lane, Diana R.

AU - Ready, Richard C.

AU - Buddemeier, Robert W.

AU - Martinich, Jeremy A.

AU - Shouse, Kate Cardamone

AU - Wobus, Cameron W.

PY - 2013/12/31

Y1 - 2013/12/31

N2 - The biological and economic values of coral reefs are highly vulnerable to increasing atmospheric and ocean carbon dioxide concentrations. We applied the COMBO simulation model (COral Mortality and Bleaching Output) to three major U.S. locations for shallow water reefs: South Florida, Puerto Rico, and Hawaii. We compared estimates of future coral cover from 2000 to 2100 for a "business as usual" (BAU) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions scenario with a GHG mitigation policy scenario involving full international participation in reducing GHG emissions. We also calculated the economic value of changes in coral cover using a benefit transfer approach based on published studies of consumers' recreational values for snorkeling and diving on coral reefs as well as existence values for coral reefs. Our results suggest that a reduced emissions scenario would provide a large benefit to shallow water reefs in Hawaii by delaying or avoiding potential future bleaching events. For Hawaii, reducing emissions is projected to result in an estimated "avoided loss" from 2000 to 2100 of approximately $10.6 billion in recreational use values compared to a BAU scenario. However, reducing emissions is projected to provide only a minor economic benefit in Puerto Rico and South Florida, where sea-surface temperatures are already close to bleaching thresholds and coral cover is projected to drop well below 5% cover under both scenarios by 2050, and below 1% cover under both scenarios by 2100.

AB - The biological and economic values of coral reefs are highly vulnerable to increasing atmospheric and ocean carbon dioxide concentrations. We applied the COMBO simulation model (COral Mortality and Bleaching Output) to three major U.S. locations for shallow water reefs: South Florida, Puerto Rico, and Hawaii. We compared estimates of future coral cover from 2000 to 2100 for a "business as usual" (BAU) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions scenario with a GHG mitigation policy scenario involving full international participation in reducing GHG emissions. We also calculated the economic value of changes in coral cover using a benefit transfer approach based on published studies of consumers' recreational values for snorkeling and diving on coral reefs as well as existence values for coral reefs. Our results suggest that a reduced emissions scenario would provide a large benefit to shallow water reefs in Hawaii by delaying or avoiding potential future bleaching events. For Hawaii, reducing emissions is projected to result in an estimated "avoided loss" from 2000 to 2100 of approximately $10.6 billion in recreational use values compared to a BAU scenario. However, reducing emissions is projected to provide only a minor economic benefit in Puerto Rico and South Florida, where sea-surface temperatures are already close to bleaching thresholds and coral cover is projected to drop well below 5% cover under both scenarios by 2050, and below 1% cover under both scenarios by 2100.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894288171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894288171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0082579

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0082579

M3 - Article

C2 - 24391717

AN - SCOPUS:84894288171

VL - 8

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 12

M1 - e82579

ER -