Quantifying elastic energy effects on interfacial energy in the Kim-Kim-Suzuki phase-field model with different interpolation schemes

Larry K. Aagesen, Daniel Schwen, Karim Ahmed, Michael Tonks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Phase-field modeling is a microstructure-level simulation technique often used in the Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) approach to materials design. To perform quantitatively accurate phase-field simulations for this application, potential sources of error in model parameters such as interfacial energy must be fully understood. To this end, the interfacial energy of the Kim-Kim-Suzuki phase-field model coupled with elastic energy was investigated as a function of interface thickness for two different schemes to interpolate mechanical properties between phases: elastic misfit strain interpolation and elastic energy interpolation. Variations in interfacial energy were quantified for bicrystal and misfitting precipitate configurations. The interfacial energy deviates from its nominal value in the absence of elastic energy, and the deviation increases with increasing interface thickness. The deviation was positive for elastic energy interpolation and negative for misfit strain interpolation, and the magnitude of the deviation was greater for elastic energy interpolation. The order parameter profile through the interface is modified for both interpolation schemes, leading to an increase in the contribution to interfacial energy from the gradient and double-well terms in the free energy functional. There is also an excess elastic energy in the interfacial region for both interpolation schemes that contributes to the change in interfacial energy between phases. A criterion to aid in choosing interface thickness for the KKS model was introduced and validated for cubic materials with dilatational eigenstrain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)10-21
Number of pages12
JournalComputational Materials Science
Volume140
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Phase Field Model
interfacial energy
Interfacial energy
interpolation
Interpolation
Interpolate
Energy
energy
deviation
Deviation
Phase Field
Bicrystals
bicrystals
Free energy
Interfaces (computer)
Precipitates
precipitates
Eigenstrain
simulation
Material Design

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)
  • Computational Mathematics

Cite this

@article{5106ea464fa54eb6a2aca20c7dcad958,
title = "Quantifying elastic energy effects on interfacial energy in the Kim-Kim-Suzuki phase-field model with different interpolation schemes",
abstract = "Phase-field modeling is a microstructure-level simulation technique often used in the Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) approach to materials design. To perform quantitatively accurate phase-field simulations for this application, potential sources of error in model parameters such as interfacial energy must be fully understood. To this end, the interfacial energy of the Kim-Kim-Suzuki phase-field model coupled with elastic energy was investigated as a function of interface thickness for two different schemes to interpolate mechanical properties between phases: elastic misfit strain interpolation and elastic energy interpolation. Variations in interfacial energy were quantified for bicrystal and misfitting precipitate configurations. The interfacial energy deviates from its nominal value in the absence of elastic energy, and the deviation increases with increasing interface thickness. The deviation was positive for elastic energy interpolation and negative for misfit strain interpolation, and the magnitude of the deviation was greater for elastic energy interpolation. The order parameter profile through the interface is modified for both interpolation schemes, leading to an increase in the contribution to interfacial energy from the gradient and double-well terms in the free energy functional. There is also an excess elastic energy in the interfacial region for both interpolation schemes that contributes to the change in interfacial energy between phases. A criterion to aid in choosing interface thickness for the KKS model was introduced and validated for cubic materials with dilatational eigenstrain.",
author = "Aagesen, {Larry K.} and Daniel Schwen and Karim Ahmed and Michael Tonks",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "140",
pages = "10--21",
journal = "Computational Materials Science",
issn = "0927-0256",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Quantifying elastic energy effects on interfacial energy in the Kim-Kim-Suzuki phase-field model with different interpolation schemes. / Aagesen, Larry K.; Schwen, Daniel; Ahmed, Karim; Tonks, Michael.

In: Computational Materials Science, Vol. 140, 01.12.2017, p. 10-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying elastic energy effects on interfacial energy in the Kim-Kim-Suzuki phase-field model with different interpolation schemes

AU - Aagesen, Larry K.

AU - Schwen, Daniel

AU - Ahmed, Karim

AU - Tonks, Michael

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Phase-field modeling is a microstructure-level simulation technique often used in the Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) approach to materials design. To perform quantitatively accurate phase-field simulations for this application, potential sources of error in model parameters such as interfacial energy must be fully understood. To this end, the interfacial energy of the Kim-Kim-Suzuki phase-field model coupled with elastic energy was investigated as a function of interface thickness for two different schemes to interpolate mechanical properties between phases: elastic misfit strain interpolation and elastic energy interpolation. Variations in interfacial energy were quantified for bicrystal and misfitting precipitate configurations. The interfacial energy deviates from its nominal value in the absence of elastic energy, and the deviation increases with increasing interface thickness. The deviation was positive for elastic energy interpolation and negative for misfit strain interpolation, and the magnitude of the deviation was greater for elastic energy interpolation. The order parameter profile through the interface is modified for both interpolation schemes, leading to an increase in the contribution to interfacial energy from the gradient and double-well terms in the free energy functional. There is also an excess elastic energy in the interfacial region for both interpolation schemes that contributes to the change in interfacial energy between phases. A criterion to aid in choosing interface thickness for the KKS model was introduced and validated for cubic materials with dilatational eigenstrain.

AB - Phase-field modeling is a microstructure-level simulation technique often used in the Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) approach to materials design. To perform quantitatively accurate phase-field simulations for this application, potential sources of error in model parameters such as interfacial energy must be fully understood. To this end, the interfacial energy of the Kim-Kim-Suzuki phase-field model coupled with elastic energy was investigated as a function of interface thickness for two different schemes to interpolate mechanical properties between phases: elastic misfit strain interpolation and elastic energy interpolation. Variations in interfacial energy were quantified for bicrystal and misfitting precipitate configurations. The interfacial energy deviates from its nominal value in the absence of elastic energy, and the deviation increases with increasing interface thickness. The deviation was positive for elastic energy interpolation and negative for misfit strain interpolation, and the magnitude of the deviation was greater for elastic energy interpolation. The order parameter profile through the interface is modified for both interpolation schemes, leading to an increase in the contribution to interfacial energy from the gradient and double-well terms in the free energy functional. There is also an excess elastic energy in the interfacial region for both interpolation schemes that contributes to the change in interfacial energy between phases. A criterion to aid in choosing interface thickness for the KKS model was introduced and validated for cubic materials with dilatational eigenstrain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028668656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028668656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.005

DO - 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85028668656

VL - 140

SP - 10

EP - 21

JO - Computational Materials Science

JF - Computational Materials Science

SN - 0927-0256

ER -