Quantifying fruit quality affected by mechanical impact for selected apple varieties

Han Fu, Jieli Duan, Manoj Karkee, Long He, Du Chen, Daozong Sun, Qin Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

To obtain baseline information for providing sufficient protection during localized shake-and-catch harvesting, the potential of fruit quality on top, middle and bottom surface zones of ‘Jazz’ ‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Envy’ apples was assessed when respectively impacted by aluminum and three different cushioned surface materials using a developed pendulum-type device. Three types of 12.7 mm thick Polyurethane foam pieces with 2.1 (Foam 1), 4.8 (Foam 2), and 9.7-11 (Foam 3) kPa deformation pressure were selected as the cushioning materials. Based on USDA Grades and Standards for fresh market apples, the categories of Extra Fancy Class 1 (no bruising), Extra Fancy and Fresh-market percentages were used to evaluate fruit quality with varying impact levels. According to equivalent principle of energy, equivalent drop heights of fruits were converted from impact forces created by surface materials impacting fruits. The fruit quality patterns with varying equivalent drop heights were determined for each of the three apple varieties. The results showed that Extra Fancy Class 1 grade was maintained within the equivalent drop heights of 24, 50 and 54 cm for ‘Jazz’ apples, 8, 18 and 38 cm for ‘Granny Smith’ apples, and 7, 26 and 34 cm ‘Envy’ apples when catching surface cushioned by Foam1, 2 and 3 respectively. To achieve better protection for higher drop heights, it would be reasonable to suggest the deformation pressure of the series of cushioning material used could be 4.8-11 kPa for ‘Jazz’ apples whereas the same for ‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Envy’ apples could be over 11 kPa.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)250-255
Number of pages6
JournalIFAC-PapersOnLine
Volume51
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Fruits
Foams
Pendulums
Polyurethanes
Aluminum

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Control and Systems Engineering

Cite this

Fu, Han ; Duan, Jieli ; Karkee, Manoj ; He, Long ; Chen, Du ; Sun, Daozong ; Zhang, Qin. / Quantifying fruit quality affected by mechanical impact for selected apple varieties. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2018 ; Vol. 51, No. 17. pp. 250-255.
@article{0ca3593779c3439daba358050836be8a,
title = "Quantifying fruit quality affected by mechanical impact for selected apple varieties",
abstract = "To obtain baseline information for providing sufficient protection during localized shake-and-catch harvesting, the potential of fruit quality on top, middle and bottom surface zones of ‘Jazz’ ‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Envy’ apples was assessed when respectively impacted by aluminum and three different cushioned surface materials using a developed pendulum-type device. Three types of 12.7 mm thick Polyurethane foam pieces with 2.1 (Foam 1), 4.8 (Foam 2), and 9.7-11 (Foam 3) kPa deformation pressure were selected as the cushioning materials. Based on USDA Grades and Standards for fresh market apples, the categories of Extra Fancy Class 1 (no bruising), Extra Fancy and Fresh-market percentages were used to evaluate fruit quality with varying impact levels. According to equivalent principle of energy, equivalent drop heights of fruits were converted from impact forces created by surface materials impacting fruits. The fruit quality patterns with varying equivalent drop heights were determined for each of the three apple varieties. The results showed that Extra Fancy Class 1 grade was maintained within the equivalent drop heights of 24, 50 and 54 cm for ‘Jazz’ apples, 8, 18 and 38 cm for ‘Granny Smith’ apples, and 7, 26 and 34 cm ‘Envy’ apples when catching surface cushioned by Foam1, 2 and 3 respectively. To achieve better protection for higher drop heights, it would be reasonable to suggest the deformation pressure of the series of cushioning material used could be 4.8-11 kPa for ‘Jazz’ apples whereas the same for ‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Envy’ apples could be over 11 kPa.",
author = "Han Fu and Jieli Duan and Manoj Karkee and Long He and Du Chen and Daozong Sun and Qin Zhang",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.166",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "250--255",
journal = "IFAC-PapersOnLine",
issn = "2405-8963",
publisher = "IFAC Secretariat",
number = "17",

}

Quantifying fruit quality affected by mechanical impact for selected apple varieties. / Fu, Han; Duan, Jieli; Karkee, Manoj; He, Long; Chen, Du; Sun, Daozong; Zhang, Qin.

In: IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol. 51, No. 17, 01.01.2018, p. 250-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying fruit quality affected by mechanical impact for selected apple varieties

AU - Fu, Han

AU - Duan, Jieli

AU - Karkee, Manoj

AU - He, Long

AU - Chen, Du

AU - Sun, Daozong

AU - Zhang, Qin

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - To obtain baseline information for providing sufficient protection during localized shake-and-catch harvesting, the potential of fruit quality on top, middle and bottom surface zones of ‘Jazz’ ‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Envy’ apples was assessed when respectively impacted by aluminum and three different cushioned surface materials using a developed pendulum-type device. Three types of 12.7 mm thick Polyurethane foam pieces with 2.1 (Foam 1), 4.8 (Foam 2), and 9.7-11 (Foam 3) kPa deformation pressure were selected as the cushioning materials. Based on USDA Grades and Standards for fresh market apples, the categories of Extra Fancy Class 1 (no bruising), Extra Fancy and Fresh-market percentages were used to evaluate fruit quality with varying impact levels. According to equivalent principle of energy, equivalent drop heights of fruits were converted from impact forces created by surface materials impacting fruits. The fruit quality patterns with varying equivalent drop heights were determined for each of the three apple varieties. The results showed that Extra Fancy Class 1 grade was maintained within the equivalent drop heights of 24, 50 and 54 cm for ‘Jazz’ apples, 8, 18 and 38 cm for ‘Granny Smith’ apples, and 7, 26 and 34 cm ‘Envy’ apples when catching surface cushioned by Foam1, 2 and 3 respectively. To achieve better protection for higher drop heights, it would be reasonable to suggest the deformation pressure of the series of cushioning material used could be 4.8-11 kPa for ‘Jazz’ apples whereas the same for ‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Envy’ apples could be over 11 kPa.

AB - To obtain baseline information for providing sufficient protection during localized shake-and-catch harvesting, the potential of fruit quality on top, middle and bottom surface zones of ‘Jazz’ ‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Envy’ apples was assessed when respectively impacted by aluminum and three different cushioned surface materials using a developed pendulum-type device. Three types of 12.7 mm thick Polyurethane foam pieces with 2.1 (Foam 1), 4.8 (Foam 2), and 9.7-11 (Foam 3) kPa deformation pressure were selected as the cushioning materials. Based on USDA Grades and Standards for fresh market apples, the categories of Extra Fancy Class 1 (no bruising), Extra Fancy and Fresh-market percentages were used to evaluate fruit quality with varying impact levels. According to equivalent principle of energy, equivalent drop heights of fruits were converted from impact forces created by surface materials impacting fruits. The fruit quality patterns with varying equivalent drop heights were determined for each of the three apple varieties. The results showed that Extra Fancy Class 1 grade was maintained within the equivalent drop heights of 24, 50 and 54 cm for ‘Jazz’ apples, 8, 18 and 38 cm for ‘Granny Smith’ apples, and 7, 26 and 34 cm ‘Envy’ apples when catching surface cushioned by Foam1, 2 and 3 respectively. To achieve better protection for higher drop heights, it would be reasonable to suggest the deformation pressure of the series of cushioning material used could be 4.8-11 kPa for ‘Jazz’ apples whereas the same for ‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Envy’ apples could be over 11 kPa.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053182601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053182601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.166

DO - 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.166

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 250

EP - 255

JO - IFAC-PapersOnLine

JF - IFAC-PapersOnLine

SN - 2405-8963

IS - 17

ER -