Quantifying wetland methane emissions with process-based models of different complexities

J. Tang, Q. Zhuang, R. D. Shannon, J. R. White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bubbling is an important pathway of methane emissions from wetland ecosystems. However the concentration-based threshold function approach in current biogeochemistry models of methane is not sufficient to represent the complex ebullition process. Here we revise an extant process-based biogeochemistry model, the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model into a multi-substance model (CH 4, O 2, CO 2 and N 2) to simulate methane production, oxidation, and transport (particularly ebullition) with different model complexities. When ebullition is modeled with a concentration-based threshold function and if the inhibition effect of oxygen on methane production and the competition for oxygen between methanotrophy and heterotrophic respiration are retained, the model becomes a two-substance system. Ignoring the role of oxygen, while still modeling ebullition with a concentration-based threshold function, reduces the model to a one-substance system. These models were tested through a group of sensitivity analyses using data from two temperate peatland sites in Michigan. We demonstrate that only the four-substance model with a pressure-based ebullition algorithm is able to capture the episodic emissions induced by a sudden decrease in atmospheric pressure or by a sudden drop in water table. All models captured the retardation effect on methane efflux from an increase in surface standing water which results from the inhibition of diffusion and the increase in rhizospheric oxidation. We conclude that to more accurately account for the effects of atmospheric pressure dynamics and standing water on methane effluxes, the multi-substance model with a pressure-based ebullition algorithm should be used in the future to quantify global wetland CH 4 emissions. Further, to more accurately simulate the pore water gas concentrations and different pathways of methane transport, an exponential root distribution function should be used and the phase-related parameters should be treated as temperature dependent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3817-3837
Number of pages21
JournalBiogeosciences
Volume7
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Fingerprint

methane
wetlands
wetland
biogeochemistry
atmospheric pressure
methane production
oxygen
methanotrophy
oxidation
water
terrestrial ecosystem
peatland
peatlands
water table
porewater
respiration
gases
ecosystems

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

Tang, J. ; Zhuang, Q. ; Shannon, R. D. ; White, J. R. / Quantifying wetland methane emissions with process-based models of different complexities. In: Biogeosciences. 2010 ; Vol. 7, No. 11. pp. 3817-3837.
@article{35c42ba26bac48378eecdbecd8a281e6,
title = "Quantifying wetland methane emissions with process-based models of different complexities",
abstract = "Bubbling is an important pathway of methane emissions from wetland ecosystems. However the concentration-based threshold function approach in current biogeochemistry models of methane is not sufficient to represent the complex ebullition process. Here we revise an extant process-based biogeochemistry model, the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model into a multi-substance model (CH 4, O 2, CO 2 and N 2) to simulate methane production, oxidation, and transport (particularly ebullition) with different model complexities. When ebullition is modeled with a concentration-based threshold function and if the inhibition effect of oxygen on methane production and the competition for oxygen between methanotrophy and heterotrophic respiration are retained, the model becomes a two-substance system. Ignoring the role of oxygen, while still modeling ebullition with a concentration-based threshold function, reduces the model to a one-substance system. These models were tested through a group of sensitivity analyses using data from two temperate peatland sites in Michigan. We demonstrate that only the four-substance model with a pressure-based ebullition algorithm is able to capture the episodic emissions induced by a sudden decrease in atmospheric pressure or by a sudden drop in water table. All models captured the retardation effect on methane efflux from an increase in surface standing water which results from the inhibition of diffusion and the increase in rhizospheric oxidation. We conclude that to more accurately account for the effects of atmospheric pressure dynamics and standing water on methane effluxes, the multi-substance model with a pressure-based ebullition algorithm should be used in the future to quantify global wetland CH 4 emissions. Further, to more accurately simulate the pore water gas concentrations and different pathways of methane transport, an exponential root distribution function should be used and the phase-related parameters should be treated as temperature dependent.",
author = "J. Tang and Q. Zhuang and Shannon, {R. D.} and White, {J. R.}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5194/bg-7-3817-2010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "3817--3837",
journal = "Biogeosciences",
issn = "1726-4170",
publisher = "European Geosciences Union",
number = "11",

}

Quantifying wetland methane emissions with process-based models of different complexities. / Tang, J.; Zhuang, Q.; Shannon, R. D.; White, J. R.

In: Biogeosciences, Vol. 7, No. 11, 01.12.2010, p. 3817-3837.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying wetland methane emissions with process-based models of different complexities

AU - Tang, J.

AU - Zhuang, Q.

AU - Shannon, R. D.

AU - White, J. R.

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Bubbling is an important pathway of methane emissions from wetland ecosystems. However the concentration-based threshold function approach in current biogeochemistry models of methane is not sufficient to represent the complex ebullition process. Here we revise an extant process-based biogeochemistry model, the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model into a multi-substance model (CH 4, O 2, CO 2 and N 2) to simulate methane production, oxidation, and transport (particularly ebullition) with different model complexities. When ebullition is modeled with a concentration-based threshold function and if the inhibition effect of oxygen on methane production and the competition for oxygen between methanotrophy and heterotrophic respiration are retained, the model becomes a two-substance system. Ignoring the role of oxygen, while still modeling ebullition with a concentration-based threshold function, reduces the model to a one-substance system. These models were tested through a group of sensitivity analyses using data from two temperate peatland sites in Michigan. We demonstrate that only the four-substance model with a pressure-based ebullition algorithm is able to capture the episodic emissions induced by a sudden decrease in atmospheric pressure or by a sudden drop in water table. All models captured the retardation effect on methane efflux from an increase in surface standing water which results from the inhibition of diffusion and the increase in rhizospheric oxidation. We conclude that to more accurately account for the effects of atmospheric pressure dynamics and standing water on methane effluxes, the multi-substance model with a pressure-based ebullition algorithm should be used in the future to quantify global wetland CH 4 emissions. Further, to more accurately simulate the pore water gas concentrations and different pathways of methane transport, an exponential root distribution function should be used and the phase-related parameters should be treated as temperature dependent.

AB - Bubbling is an important pathway of methane emissions from wetland ecosystems. However the concentration-based threshold function approach in current biogeochemistry models of methane is not sufficient to represent the complex ebullition process. Here we revise an extant process-based biogeochemistry model, the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model into a multi-substance model (CH 4, O 2, CO 2 and N 2) to simulate methane production, oxidation, and transport (particularly ebullition) with different model complexities. When ebullition is modeled with a concentration-based threshold function and if the inhibition effect of oxygen on methane production and the competition for oxygen between methanotrophy and heterotrophic respiration are retained, the model becomes a two-substance system. Ignoring the role of oxygen, while still modeling ebullition with a concentration-based threshold function, reduces the model to a one-substance system. These models were tested through a group of sensitivity analyses using data from two temperate peatland sites in Michigan. We demonstrate that only the four-substance model with a pressure-based ebullition algorithm is able to capture the episodic emissions induced by a sudden decrease in atmospheric pressure or by a sudden drop in water table. All models captured the retardation effect on methane efflux from an increase in surface standing water which results from the inhibition of diffusion and the increase in rhizospheric oxidation. We conclude that to more accurately account for the effects of atmospheric pressure dynamics and standing water on methane effluxes, the multi-substance model with a pressure-based ebullition algorithm should be used in the future to quantify global wetland CH 4 emissions. Further, to more accurately simulate the pore water gas concentrations and different pathways of methane transport, an exponential root distribution function should be used and the phase-related parameters should be treated as temperature dependent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960570693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960570693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/bg-7-3817-2010

DO - 10.5194/bg-7-3817-2010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960570693

VL - 7

SP - 3817

EP - 3837

JO - Biogeosciences

JF - Biogeosciences

SN - 1726-4170

IS - 11

ER -