Quantitative volumetric analysis post transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery

Seyed Alireza Mansouri, Sean Symons, Michael Schwartz, Joseph Chen, Farhad Pirouzmand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Computed tomogram (CT) imaging is often used for immediate postoperative assessment of transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for follow-up. The residual mass is known to decrease in size over time but the difference between the two imaging modalities has not been quantified. Our objective was to quantify the size difference of the residual mass on immediate postoperative CT compared with delayed MRI. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 69 patients who had undergone pituitary adenoma resection at our institution between 2004-2010. Sellar and suprasellar diameter, along with the overall volume of the residual mass were measured on both the immediate postoperative CT and delayed MRI. Results: Average preoperative sellar and suprasellar diameter was 22.2 ± 4.6mm and 20.9 ± 5.9mm, respectively. Average sellar residual diameter on immediate postoperative CT (16.5 ± 5.4 mm, 25% reduction) was significantly larger than delayed MRI (10.6 ± 6.2mm, 52% reduction). The average suprasellar component on CT (15.5±6.5mm, 26% reduction) was also significantly larger than that on MRI (3.3 ± 5.4 mm, 84% reduction). The postoperative CT showed a 46% reduction in volume while a 71% reduction was noted on the delayed MRI. Conclusion: A significant reduction in residual mass is noted on delayed MR imaging compared with immediate postoperative CT. Therefore, from a resource management and prognostication point of view, CT should be used for immediate postoperative assessment while delayed MRI should be used to assess operative success and for communication with patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)600-604
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

Fingerprint

Pituitary Neoplasms
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Residual Volume
Communication

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Mansouri, Seyed Alireza ; Symons, Sean ; Schwartz, Michael ; Chen, Joseph ; Pirouzmand, Farhad. / Quantitative volumetric analysis post transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery. In: Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 2012 ; Vol. 39, No. 5. pp. 600-604.
@article{87de7b07d5fe4478bc7cf4d024fe485a,
title = "Quantitative volumetric analysis post transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery",
abstract = "Background: Computed tomogram (CT) imaging is often used for immediate postoperative assessment of transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for follow-up. The residual mass is known to decrease in size over time but the difference between the two imaging modalities has not been quantified. Our objective was to quantify the size difference of the residual mass on immediate postoperative CT compared with delayed MRI. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 69 patients who had undergone pituitary adenoma resection at our institution between 2004-2010. Sellar and suprasellar diameter, along with the overall volume of the residual mass were measured on both the immediate postoperative CT and delayed MRI. Results: Average preoperative sellar and suprasellar diameter was 22.2 ± 4.6mm and 20.9 ± 5.9mm, respectively. Average sellar residual diameter on immediate postoperative CT (16.5 ± 5.4 mm, 25{\%} reduction) was significantly larger than delayed MRI (10.6 ± 6.2mm, 52{\%} reduction). The average suprasellar component on CT (15.5±6.5mm, 26{\%} reduction) was also significantly larger than that on MRI (3.3 ± 5.4 mm, 84{\%} reduction). The postoperative CT showed a 46{\%} reduction in volume while a 71{\%} reduction was noted on the delayed MRI. Conclusion: A significant reduction in residual mass is noted on delayed MR imaging compared with immediate postoperative CT. Therefore, from a resource management and prognostication point of view, CT should be used for immediate postoperative assessment while delayed MRI should be used to assess operative success and for communication with patients.",
author = "Mansouri, {Seyed Alireza} and Sean Symons and Michael Schwartz and Joseph Chen and Farhad Pirouzmand",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0317167100015328",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "600--604",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences",
issn = "0317-1671",
publisher = "Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences",
number = "5",

}

Quantitative volumetric analysis post transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery. / Mansouri, Seyed Alireza; Symons, Sean; Schwartz, Michael; Chen, Joseph; Pirouzmand, Farhad.

In: Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 5, 01.09.2012, p. 600-604.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative volumetric analysis post transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery

AU - Mansouri, Seyed Alireza

AU - Symons, Sean

AU - Schwartz, Michael

AU - Chen, Joseph

AU - Pirouzmand, Farhad

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Background: Computed tomogram (CT) imaging is often used for immediate postoperative assessment of transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for follow-up. The residual mass is known to decrease in size over time but the difference between the two imaging modalities has not been quantified. Our objective was to quantify the size difference of the residual mass on immediate postoperative CT compared with delayed MRI. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 69 patients who had undergone pituitary adenoma resection at our institution between 2004-2010. Sellar and suprasellar diameter, along with the overall volume of the residual mass were measured on both the immediate postoperative CT and delayed MRI. Results: Average preoperative sellar and suprasellar diameter was 22.2 ± 4.6mm and 20.9 ± 5.9mm, respectively. Average sellar residual diameter on immediate postoperative CT (16.5 ± 5.4 mm, 25% reduction) was significantly larger than delayed MRI (10.6 ± 6.2mm, 52% reduction). The average suprasellar component on CT (15.5±6.5mm, 26% reduction) was also significantly larger than that on MRI (3.3 ± 5.4 mm, 84% reduction). The postoperative CT showed a 46% reduction in volume while a 71% reduction was noted on the delayed MRI. Conclusion: A significant reduction in residual mass is noted on delayed MR imaging compared with immediate postoperative CT. Therefore, from a resource management and prognostication point of view, CT should be used for immediate postoperative assessment while delayed MRI should be used to assess operative success and for communication with patients.

AB - Background: Computed tomogram (CT) imaging is often used for immediate postoperative assessment of transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for follow-up. The residual mass is known to decrease in size over time but the difference between the two imaging modalities has not been quantified. Our objective was to quantify the size difference of the residual mass on immediate postoperative CT compared with delayed MRI. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 69 patients who had undergone pituitary adenoma resection at our institution between 2004-2010. Sellar and suprasellar diameter, along with the overall volume of the residual mass were measured on both the immediate postoperative CT and delayed MRI. Results: Average preoperative sellar and suprasellar diameter was 22.2 ± 4.6mm and 20.9 ± 5.9mm, respectively. Average sellar residual diameter on immediate postoperative CT (16.5 ± 5.4 mm, 25% reduction) was significantly larger than delayed MRI (10.6 ± 6.2mm, 52% reduction). The average suprasellar component on CT (15.5±6.5mm, 26% reduction) was also significantly larger than that on MRI (3.3 ± 5.4 mm, 84% reduction). The postoperative CT showed a 46% reduction in volume while a 71% reduction was noted on the delayed MRI. Conclusion: A significant reduction in residual mass is noted on delayed MR imaging compared with immediate postoperative CT. Therefore, from a resource management and prognostication point of view, CT should be used for immediate postoperative assessment while delayed MRI should be used to assess operative success and for communication with patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868216355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868216355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0317167100015328

DO - 10.1017/S0317167100015328

M3 - Article

C2 - 22931700

AN - SCOPUS:84868216355

VL - 39

SP - 600

EP - 604

JO - Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences

JF - Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences

SN - 0317-1671

IS - 5

ER -