Questioning a Courtroom Proof of the Uniqueness of Fingerprints

David H. Kaye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Forensic scientists or analysts concerned with "individualization" often presume that features such as fingerprint minutia are unique to each individual. In the United States, defendants in criminal cases have been demanding proof of such assumptions. In at least two cases, the government of the United States has successfully relied on an unpublished statistical study prepared specifically for litigation to demonstrate the uniqueness of fingerprints. This article suggests that the study is neither designed nor executed in a way that can show whether an individual's fingerprint impressions are unique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)521-533
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Statistical Review
Volume71
Issue number3
StatePublished - Dec 2003

Fingerprint

Fingerprint
Uniqueness
Demonstrate
Analysts
Government
Individualization
Litigation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mathematics(all)
  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

@article{f7705f5cbc704ff6a8654c25c8d5256a,
title = "Questioning a Courtroom Proof of the Uniqueness of Fingerprints",
abstract = "Forensic scientists or analysts concerned with {"}individualization{"} often presume that features such as fingerprint minutia are unique to each individual. In the United States, defendants in criminal cases have been demanding proof of such assumptions. In at least two cases, the government of the United States has successfully relied on an unpublished statistical study prepared specifically for litigation to demonstrate the uniqueness of fingerprints. This article suggests that the study is neither designed nor executed in a way that can show whether an individual's fingerprint impressions are unique.",
author = "Kaye, {David H.}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "521--533",
journal = "International Statistical Review",
issn = "0306-7734",
publisher = "International Statistical Institute",
number = "3",

}

Questioning a Courtroom Proof of the Uniqueness of Fingerprints. / Kaye, David H.

In: International Statistical Review, Vol. 71, No. 3, 12.2003, p. 521-533.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Questioning a Courtroom Proof of the Uniqueness of Fingerprints

AU - Kaye, David H.

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - Forensic scientists or analysts concerned with "individualization" often presume that features such as fingerprint minutia are unique to each individual. In the United States, defendants in criminal cases have been demanding proof of such assumptions. In at least two cases, the government of the United States has successfully relied on an unpublished statistical study prepared specifically for litigation to demonstrate the uniqueness of fingerprints. This article suggests that the study is neither designed nor executed in a way that can show whether an individual's fingerprint impressions are unique.

AB - Forensic scientists or analysts concerned with "individualization" often presume that features such as fingerprint minutia are unique to each individual. In the United States, defendants in criminal cases have been demanding proof of such assumptions. In at least two cases, the government of the United States has successfully relied on an unpublished statistical study prepared specifically for litigation to demonstrate the uniqueness of fingerprints. This article suggests that the study is neither designed nor executed in a way that can show whether an individual's fingerprint impressions are unique.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345357214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345357214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0345357214

VL - 71

SP - 521

EP - 533

JO - International Statistical Review

JF - International Statistical Review

SN - 0306-7734

IS - 3

ER -