Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing

Ben Feldmeyer, Jeffrey Todd Ulmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines whether federal sentencing decisions are influenced by the racial/ethnic composition of federal court districts. Multilevel models of individual cases within federal judicial districts show that Black defendants receive moderately longer sentences than Whites, and that Hispanics and Whites receive similar sentences. These race/ethnicity effects on sentence length are found to vary across federal districts but not as predicted by racial threat theory. In contrast to racial threat predictions, Black sentence lengths are not significantly conditioned by the district Black population. Contrary to racial threat predictions, Hispanic defendants receive the harshest sentences when they account for the smallest share of the population (1 to 3 percent) and the most lenient sentences when they make up more sizable shares of district populations (more than 27 percent). Our results indicate that racial threat theory provides an inadequate explanation of how social contexts influence the federal sentencing of Blacks and Hispanics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)238-270
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2011

Fingerprint

Hispanic Americans
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

@article{f3e3144846de40fea4b72aacbe5a71f8,
title = "Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing",
abstract = "This study examines whether federal sentencing decisions are influenced by the racial/ethnic composition of federal court districts. Multilevel models of individual cases within federal judicial districts show that Black defendants receive moderately longer sentences than Whites, and that Hispanics and Whites receive similar sentences. These race/ethnicity effects on sentence length are found to vary across federal districts but not as predicted by racial threat theory. In contrast to racial threat predictions, Black sentence lengths are not significantly conditioned by the district Black population. Contrary to racial threat predictions, Hispanic defendants receive the harshest sentences when they account for the smallest share of the population (1 to 3 percent) and the most lenient sentences when they make up more sizable shares of district populations (more than 27 percent). Our results indicate that racial threat theory provides an inadequate explanation of how social contexts influence the federal sentencing of Blacks and Hispanics.",
author = "Ben Feldmeyer and Ulmer, {Jeffrey Todd}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022427810391538",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "238--270",
journal = "Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency",
issn = "0022-4278",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. / Feldmeyer, Ben; Ulmer, Jeffrey Todd.

In: Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 48, No. 2, 01.05.2011, p. 238-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing

AU - Feldmeyer, Ben

AU - Ulmer, Jeffrey Todd

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - This study examines whether federal sentencing decisions are influenced by the racial/ethnic composition of federal court districts. Multilevel models of individual cases within federal judicial districts show that Black defendants receive moderately longer sentences than Whites, and that Hispanics and Whites receive similar sentences. These race/ethnicity effects on sentence length are found to vary across federal districts but not as predicted by racial threat theory. In contrast to racial threat predictions, Black sentence lengths are not significantly conditioned by the district Black population. Contrary to racial threat predictions, Hispanic defendants receive the harshest sentences when they account for the smallest share of the population (1 to 3 percent) and the most lenient sentences when they make up more sizable shares of district populations (more than 27 percent). Our results indicate that racial threat theory provides an inadequate explanation of how social contexts influence the federal sentencing of Blacks and Hispanics.

AB - This study examines whether federal sentencing decisions are influenced by the racial/ethnic composition of federal court districts. Multilevel models of individual cases within federal judicial districts show that Black defendants receive moderately longer sentences than Whites, and that Hispanics and Whites receive similar sentences. These race/ethnicity effects on sentence length are found to vary across federal districts but not as predicted by racial threat theory. In contrast to racial threat predictions, Black sentence lengths are not significantly conditioned by the district Black population. Contrary to racial threat predictions, Hispanic defendants receive the harshest sentences when they account for the smallest share of the population (1 to 3 percent) and the most lenient sentences when they make up more sizable shares of district populations (more than 27 percent). Our results indicate that racial threat theory provides an inadequate explanation of how social contexts influence the federal sentencing of Blacks and Hispanics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955735610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955735610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022427810391538

DO - 10.1177/0022427810391538

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79955735610

VL - 48

SP - 238

EP - 270

JO - Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

JF - Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

SN - 0022-4278

IS - 2

ER -