Radiofrequency ablation should not be considered as an alternative to surgical resection

Rajeev Sharma

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2008

Fingerprint

Digestive System Surgical Procedures
Catheter Ablation
Liver Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{69cbbb3871ef4e1a99365b18b65c3287,
title = "Radiofrequency ablation should not be considered as an alternative to surgical resection",
author = "Rajeev Sharma",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/0973-1482.43152",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics",
issn = "0973-1482",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Radiofrequency ablation should not be considered as an alternative to surgical resection. / Sharma, Rajeev.

In: Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, Vol. 4, No. 3, 01.07.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiofrequency ablation should not be considered as an alternative to surgical resection

AU - Sharma, Rajeev

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53749093522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53749093522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/0973-1482.43152

DO - 10.4103/0973-1482.43152

M3 - Letter

C2 - 18923210

AN - SCOPUS:53749093522

VL - 4

JO - Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics

JF - Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics

SN - 0973-1482

IS - 3

ER -