TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiology Research Funding
T2 - Current State and Future Opportunities
AU - Chetlen, Alison L.
AU - Degnan, Andrew J.
AU - Guelfguat, Mark
AU - Griffith, Brent
AU - Itri, Jason
AU - Matta, Hazem
AU - Tong, Angela
AU - Flug, Jonathan
AU - Toy, Dennis
AU - Consul, Nikita
AU - Walker, Eric
AU - Spalluto, Lucy
AU - Smith, Andrew D.
AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Nevertheless, in addition to the prestige associated with obtaining NIH grants, there are measurable positive outcomes associated with receiving NIH funding. One paper found that NIH funding was the best predictor of publications in US radiology departments (65) . Furthermore, the projects funded by NIH tend to be larger scale clinical trials with high degree of scientific value (65) . However, despite the recognition NIH grants may bring, a substantial portion of radiology research, specifically published articles, receive little to no support from NIH grants. In fact, of US journal articles, only 18.58% received NIH grant support (65) . This is not surprising given that research topics have diversified over the years. In addition to technological developments and clinical applications, articles relating to health-care policy, quality improvement, and education have become important areas of research. Thus, although NIH funding may be a measure of research productivity within an institution, lack of NIH funding does not necessarily hinder its ability to contribute.
Funding Information:
The NSF provides about one-fourth of federal support to academic institutions for all fields of fundamental science and engineering, except for medical sciences (67) , through grants and cooperative agreements (68) . The NSF receives approximately 40,000 proposals each year, including several thousand applications for graduate and postdoctoral fellowships, of which approximately 11,000 are funded (68) . The NSF can provide assistance for radiology technology development grants as the NIH tends to fund more outcomes-related research. It is not uncommon for basic scientists to first develop technology with NSF funds, then collaborate with their clinical colleagues on NIH grants to validate the technology clinically.
Funding Information:
The relative plateau in federal funding has increased the competitiveness of NIH grants. Aside from the overall impact of research generated, one unexpected consequence is on the career development of future scientists. Young scientists are receiving a smaller share of publicly funded grants. A recent article in The Atlantic highlights this growing concern (66) . In 1983, approximately 18% of scientists receiving an NIH grant were 36 years old or younger. By 2010, that percentage had decreased to only 3% (66) . If the trend continues, support and grants from various sources will become increasingly important for young researchers.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Association of University Radiologists
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Funding for research has become increasingly difficult to obtain in an environment of decreasing clinical revenue, increasing research costs, and growing competition for federal and nonfederal funding sources. This paper identifies critical requirements to build and sustain a successful radiology research program (eg, key personnel and leadership, research training and mentorship, infrastructure, institutional and departmental funding or support), reviews the current state of available funding for radiology (including federal, nonfederal, philanthropy, crowdfunding, and industry), and describes promising opportunities for future funding (eg, health services, comparative effectiveness, and patient-centered outcomes research). The funding climate, especially at the federal level, changes periodically, so it is important to have radiology-specific organizations such as the American College of Radiology and the Academy of Radiology Research serving as our key advocates. Key to obtaining any funding, no matter what the source, is a well-formulated grant proposal, so a review of opportunities specifically available to radiologists to develop and hone their grant-writing skills is provided. Effective and sustained funding for radiology research has the potential to cultivate young researchers, bolster quality research, and enhance health care. Those interested in pursuing research need to be aware of the ever-changing funding landscape, research priority areas, and the resources available to them to succeed. To succeed, radiology researchers need to think about diversification and flexibility in their interests, developing multidisciplinary and multi-institutional projects, and engaging a broader base of stakeholders that includes patients.
AB - Funding for research has become increasingly difficult to obtain in an environment of decreasing clinical revenue, increasing research costs, and growing competition for federal and nonfederal funding sources. This paper identifies critical requirements to build and sustain a successful radiology research program (eg, key personnel and leadership, research training and mentorship, infrastructure, institutional and departmental funding or support), reviews the current state of available funding for radiology (including federal, nonfederal, philanthropy, crowdfunding, and industry), and describes promising opportunities for future funding (eg, health services, comparative effectiveness, and patient-centered outcomes research). The funding climate, especially at the federal level, changes periodically, so it is important to have radiology-specific organizations such as the American College of Radiology and the Academy of Radiology Research serving as our key advocates. Key to obtaining any funding, no matter what the source, is a well-formulated grant proposal, so a review of opportunities specifically available to radiologists to develop and hone their grant-writing skills is provided. Effective and sustained funding for radiology research has the potential to cultivate young researchers, bolster quality research, and enhance health care. Those interested in pursuing research need to be aware of the ever-changing funding landscape, research priority areas, and the resources available to them to succeed. To succeed, radiology researchers need to think about diversification and flexibility in their interests, developing multidisciplinary and multi-institutional projects, and engaging a broader base of stakeholders that includes patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028626392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028626392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2017.07.013
DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2017.07.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 30711054
AN - SCOPUS:85028626392
SN - 1076-6332
VL - 25
SP - 26
EP - 39
JO - Academic Radiology
JF - Academic Radiology
IS - 1
ER -