Raiders of the lost vote: A theory-driven model of ballot invalidation in Florida’s 2000 election

April Kelly-Woessner, Matthew Woessner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In analyzing the results of the 2000 Florida election, we argue the need for a more theoretical model of ballot invalidation. The majority of studies to date link together both undervotes and overvotes into one measure of “rejected,” “voided” or “invalidated” ballots. We demonstrate that these two types of errors are notably distinct. Specifically, overvoting involves more cognitive or “decision” errors, while undervoting is more a product of mechanical or “physical” errors. As such, we maintain that undervotes are more likely to be the product of random error and are less likely to be related to the racial composition of a district than are overvotes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)264-294
Number of pages31
JournalPolitics and Policy
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

model theory
voter
election
district

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Kelly-Woessner, April ; Woessner, Matthew. / Raiders of the lost vote : A theory-driven model of ballot invalidation in Florida’s 2000 election. In: Politics and Policy. 2005 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 264-294.
@article{fed73c3e254749fe9a25091b6ad929ed,
title = "Raiders of the lost vote: A theory-driven model of ballot invalidation in Florida’s 2000 election",
abstract = "In analyzing the results of the 2000 Florida election, we argue the need for a more theoretical model of ballot invalidation. The majority of studies to date link together both undervotes and overvotes into one measure of “rejected,” “voided” or “invalidated” ballots. We demonstrate that these two types of errors are notably distinct. Specifically, overvoting involves more cognitive or “decision” errors, while undervoting is more a product of mechanical or “physical” errors. As such, we maintain that undervotes are more likely to be the product of random error and are less likely to be related to the racial composition of a district than are overvotes.",
author = "April Kelly-Woessner and Matthew Woessner",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1747-1346.2005.tb00643.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "264--294",
journal = "Politics and Policy",
issn = "1555-5623",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Raiders of the lost vote : A theory-driven model of ballot invalidation in Florida’s 2000 election. / Kelly-Woessner, April; Woessner, Matthew.

In: Politics and Policy, Vol. 33, No. 2, 01.01.2005, p. 264-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Raiders of the lost vote

T2 - A theory-driven model of ballot invalidation in Florida’s 2000 election

AU - Kelly-Woessner, April

AU - Woessner, Matthew

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - In analyzing the results of the 2000 Florida election, we argue the need for a more theoretical model of ballot invalidation. The majority of studies to date link together both undervotes and overvotes into one measure of “rejected,” “voided” or “invalidated” ballots. We demonstrate that these two types of errors are notably distinct. Specifically, overvoting involves more cognitive or “decision” errors, while undervoting is more a product of mechanical or “physical” errors. As such, we maintain that undervotes are more likely to be the product of random error and are less likely to be related to the racial composition of a district than are overvotes.

AB - In analyzing the results of the 2000 Florida election, we argue the need for a more theoretical model of ballot invalidation. The majority of studies to date link together both undervotes and overvotes into one measure of “rejected,” “voided” or “invalidated” ballots. We demonstrate that these two types of errors are notably distinct. Specifically, overvoting involves more cognitive or “decision” errors, while undervoting is more a product of mechanical or “physical” errors. As such, we maintain that undervotes are more likely to be the product of random error and are less likely to be related to the racial composition of a district than are overvotes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248032493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248032493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2005.tb00643.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2005.tb00643.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34248032493

VL - 33

SP - 264

EP - 294

JO - Politics and Policy

JF - Politics and Policy

SN - 1555-5623

IS - 2

ER -