Rank aggregation methods comparison: A case for triage prioritization

Erica B. Fields, Gül E. Okudan, Omar Ashour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper seeks to test and to determine a suitable aggregation method to represent a set of rankings made by individual decision makers (DMs). A case study for triage prioritization is used to test the aggregation methods. The triage is a decision-making process with which patients are prioritized according to their medical condition and chance of survival on arrival at the emergency department (ED). There is a lot of subjective decision-making in the process which leads to discrepancies among nurses. Four rank aggregation methods are applied to the prioritization data and then an expert evaluates the results and judges them on practicality and acceptability. The proposed recommendation for preference aggregation is the method of the estimation of utility intervals. Expert opinion is highly valued in a decision-making environment such as this, where experience and intuition are key to successful job performance and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1305-1311
Number of pages7
JournalExpert Systems with Applications
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2013

Fingerprint

Agglomeration
Decision making

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Fields, Erica B. ; Okudan, Gül E. ; Ashour, Omar. / Rank aggregation methods comparison : A case for triage prioritization. In: Expert Systems with Applications. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 1305-1311.
@article{9a34032eb90143a991c215ab5b5fa3fd,
title = "Rank aggregation methods comparison: A case for triage prioritization",
abstract = "This paper seeks to test and to determine a suitable aggregation method to represent a set of rankings made by individual decision makers (DMs). A case study for triage prioritization is used to test the aggregation methods. The triage is a decision-making process with which patients are prioritized according to their medical condition and chance of survival on arrival at the emergency department (ED). There is a lot of subjective decision-making in the process which leads to discrepancies among nurses. Four rank aggregation methods are applied to the prioritization data and then an expert evaluates the results and judges them on practicality and acceptability. The proposed recommendation for preference aggregation is the method of the estimation of utility intervals. Expert opinion is highly valued in a decision-making environment such as this, where experience and intuition are key to successful job performance and outcomes.",
author = "Fields, {Erica B.} and Okudan, {G{\"u}l E.} and Omar Ashour",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.060",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "1305--1311",
journal = "Expert Systems with Applications",
issn = "0957-4174",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

Rank aggregation methods comparison : A case for triage prioritization. / Fields, Erica B.; Okudan, Gül E.; Ashour, Omar.

In: Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.03.2013, p. 1305-1311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rank aggregation methods comparison

T2 - A case for triage prioritization

AU - Fields, Erica B.

AU - Okudan, Gül E.

AU - Ashour, Omar

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - This paper seeks to test and to determine a suitable aggregation method to represent a set of rankings made by individual decision makers (DMs). A case study for triage prioritization is used to test the aggregation methods. The triage is a decision-making process with which patients are prioritized according to their medical condition and chance of survival on arrival at the emergency department (ED). There is a lot of subjective decision-making in the process which leads to discrepancies among nurses. Four rank aggregation methods are applied to the prioritization data and then an expert evaluates the results and judges them on practicality and acceptability. The proposed recommendation for preference aggregation is the method of the estimation of utility intervals. Expert opinion is highly valued in a decision-making environment such as this, where experience and intuition are key to successful job performance and outcomes.

AB - This paper seeks to test and to determine a suitable aggregation method to represent a set of rankings made by individual decision makers (DMs). A case study for triage prioritization is used to test the aggregation methods. The triage is a decision-making process with which patients are prioritized according to their medical condition and chance of survival on arrival at the emergency department (ED). There is a lot of subjective decision-making in the process which leads to discrepancies among nurses. Four rank aggregation methods are applied to the prioritization data and then an expert evaluates the results and judges them on practicality and acceptability. The proposed recommendation for preference aggregation is the method of the estimation of utility intervals. Expert opinion is highly valued in a decision-making environment such as this, where experience and intuition are key to successful job performance and outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870255202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870255202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.060

DO - 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.060

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84870255202

VL - 40

SP - 1305

EP - 1311

JO - Expert Systems with Applications

JF - Expert Systems with Applications

SN - 0957-4174

IS - 4

ER -