Ranking of choice cues for smartphones using the Best–Worst scaling method

Luis Pinto, Erdener Kaynak, Clement S.F. Chow, Lida L. Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The number of studies on the use of choice cues in the purchase decision of a smartphone does not appear to be extensive, given the size and rate of growth of the market. Surprisingly, it appears that no study of this type in the Chinese context has been undertaken. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to fill the existing gap in the marketing literature in this area. Design/methodology/approach: Best–Worst (BW) scaling method was used in the study. It is suggested that the method overcomes some of the biases commonly found in surveys where Likert-type scales are used, and it has superior discriminating power, because respondents are asked to rank the most and the least important factor from a group, and are thereby forced to make tradeoffs between factors. Findings: Among the 13 choice cues, connectivity, price and memory capacity are found to be the most important, whereas recommendation from others, ease of handling and availability of apps are found to be the least important. Findings due to gender, income and age difference were also analyzed and discussed for orderly decision-making purposes. Practical implications: The ranking of factors showing what choice cues consumers consider most or least important in a particular market helps practitioners to develop appropriate adaptation strategies for the market. The comparison of findings for gender, income and age difference can further help practitioners to devise various alternative marketing strategies for different market segments and identify underserved segments, if any. Originality/value: The BW scaling method, however, appropriate in ranking order of importance, had never been used in ranking choice cues of smartphone purchase. Moreover, there seems to be a dearth of studies about ranking of choice cues on smartphone purchases in the Chinese context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-245
Number of pages23
JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 14 2019

Fingerprint

Ranking
Scaling
Factors
Gender differences
Age differences
Purchase
Income differences
Trade-offs
Market segments
Design methodology
Marketing
Decision making
Adaptation strategies
Marketing strategy
Purchase decision
Connectivity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Marketing

Cite this

Pinto, Luis ; Kaynak, Erdener ; Chow, Clement S.F. ; Zhang, Lida L. / Ranking of choice cues for smartphones using the Best–Worst scaling method. In: Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 2019 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 223-245.
@article{3ef015df612747af94c348fda8c40609,
title = "Ranking of choice cues for smartphones using the Best–Worst scaling method",
abstract = "Purpose: The number of studies on the use of choice cues in the purchase decision of a smartphone does not appear to be extensive, given the size and rate of growth of the market. Surprisingly, it appears that no study of this type in the Chinese context has been undertaken. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to fill the existing gap in the marketing literature in this area. Design/methodology/approach: Best–Worst (BW) scaling method was used in the study. It is suggested that the method overcomes some of the biases commonly found in surveys where Likert-type scales are used, and it has superior discriminating power, because respondents are asked to rank the most and the least important factor from a group, and are thereby forced to make tradeoffs between factors. Findings: Among the 13 choice cues, connectivity, price and memory capacity are found to be the most important, whereas recommendation from others, ease of handling and availability of apps are found to be the least important. Findings due to gender, income and age difference were also analyzed and discussed for orderly decision-making purposes. Practical implications: The ranking of factors showing what choice cues consumers consider most or least important in a particular market helps practitioners to develop appropriate adaptation strategies for the market. The comparison of findings for gender, income and age difference can further help practitioners to devise various alternative marketing strategies for different market segments and identify underserved segments, if any. Originality/value: The BW scaling method, however, appropriate in ranking order of importance, had never been used in ranking choice cues of smartphone purchase. Moreover, there seems to be a dearth of studies about ranking of choice cues on smartphone purchases in the Chinese context.",
author = "Luis Pinto and Erdener Kaynak and Chow, {Clement S.F.} and Zhang, {Lida L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1108/APJML-01-2018-0004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "223--245",
journal = "Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics",
issn = "1355-5855",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Ranking of choice cues for smartphones using the Best–Worst scaling method. / Pinto, Luis; Kaynak, Erdener; Chow, Clement S.F.; Zhang, Lida L.

In: Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 31, No. 1, 14.01.2019, p. 223-245.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ranking of choice cues for smartphones using the Best–Worst scaling method

AU - Pinto, Luis

AU - Kaynak, Erdener

AU - Chow, Clement S.F.

AU - Zhang, Lida L.

PY - 2019/1/14

Y1 - 2019/1/14

N2 - Purpose: The number of studies on the use of choice cues in the purchase decision of a smartphone does not appear to be extensive, given the size and rate of growth of the market. Surprisingly, it appears that no study of this type in the Chinese context has been undertaken. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to fill the existing gap in the marketing literature in this area. Design/methodology/approach: Best–Worst (BW) scaling method was used in the study. It is suggested that the method overcomes some of the biases commonly found in surveys where Likert-type scales are used, and it has superior discriminating power, because respondents are asked to rank the most and the least important factor from a group, and are thereby forced to make tradeoffs between factors. Findings: Among the 13 choice cues, connectivity, price and memory capacity are found to be the most important, whereas recommendation from others, ease of handling and availability of apps are found to be the least important. Findings due to gender, income and age difference were also analyzed and discussed for orderly decision-making purposes. Practical implications: The ranking of factors showing what choice cues consumers consider most or least important in a particular market helps practitioners to develop appropriate adaptation strategies for the market. The comparison of findings for gender, income and age difference can further help practitioners to devise various alternative marketing strategies for different market segments and identify underserved segments, if any. Originality/value: The BW scaling method, however, appropriate in ranking order of importance, had never been used in ranking choice cues of smartphone purchase. Moreover, there seems to be a dearth of studies about ranking of choice cues on smartphone purchases in the Chinese context.

AB - Purpose: The number of studies on the use of choice cues in the purchase decision of a smartphone does not appear to be extensive, given the size and rate of growth of the market. Surprisingly, it appears that no study of this type in the Chinese context has been undertaken. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to fill the existing gap in the marketing literature in this area. Design/methodology/approach: Best–Worst (BW) scaling method was used in the study. It is suggested that the method overcomes some of the biases commonly found in surveys where Likert-type scales are used, and it has superior discriminating power, because respondents are asked to rank the most and the least important factor from a group, and are thereby forced to make tradeoffs between factors. Findings: Among the 13 choice cues, connectivity, price and memory capacity are found to be the most important, whereas recommendation from others, ease of handling and availability of apps are found to be the least important. Findings due to gender, income and age difference were also analyzed and discussed for orderly decision-making purposes. Practical implications: The ranking of factors showing what choice cues consumers consider most or least important in a particular market helps practitioners to develop appropriate adaptation strategies for the market. The comparison of findings for gender, income and age difference can further help practitioners to devise various alternative marketing strategies for different market segments and identify underserved segments, if any. Originality/value: The BW scaling method, however, appropriate in ranking order of importance, had never been used in ranking choice cues of smartphone purchase. Moreover, there seems to be a dearth of studies about ranking of choice cues on smartphone purchases in the Chinese context.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060149738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060149738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/APJML-01-2018-0004

DO - 10.1108/APJML-01-2018-0004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060149738

VL - 31

SP - 223

EP - 245

JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics

JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics

SN - 1355-5855

IS - 1

ER -