A growing body of research on offender decision making has focused on studying the use of heuristic biases, or cognitive shortcuts taken in certain situations, when offenders make decisions in the face of uncertainty. The idea is that when offenders (or any individuals) are contemplating uncertain decisions with limited time, information, or resources to make a rational choice calculus, heuristics enable a suitable decision to be reached quickly. However, often heuristics can lead to biases, errors, preference reversals, or suboptimal decisions. This chapter considers departures from rational behavior and heuristics and biases, specifically how the latter have been integrated into the study of offenders' choice calculus. In particular, it reviews how biases and deviations from rationality have been routinely observed when studying offender decisions.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Title of host publication||The Oxford Handbook of Offender Decision Making|
|Publisher||Oxford University Press|
|Number of pages||14|
|State||Published - Jan 1 2017|
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Sciences(all)