Reality and philosophy: Reflections on cora diamond's work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The publication of Cora Diamond's important 2002 "The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy" (in Philosophy and Animal Life) stimulated the writing of this essay. "The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy" attempted to show that there are experiences of reality (recounted especially in literature like John Coetzee's novels and Ted Hughes' poetry) in relation to which philosophical concepts and words encounter difficulty. The experiences resist conceptualization. By examining several of Diamond's earlier writings, I try to show that the difficulty of philosophical conceptualization of reality is due to the fact that reality does not exist external to experience. Reality being internal to experience means that reality contains an unfixed set of possibilities. Being experiential, reality is historical. The historical dimension of reality-such as the reality of animal life suffering-makes the words through we describe this reality too weak, i.e. they are not powerful enough to capture reality, hence the difficulty. Consequently, as I argue, for Diamond, the weakness of words means that words are never complete concepts. The meaning of them seems always still to come since reality seems always to have a surplus of possibilities. I suggest that because of this always still "to come" aspect of the meaning of words, we might characterise Diamond's thought as a messianism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-366
Number of pages14
JournalPhilosophical Investigations
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011

Fingerprint

Cora Diamond
Philosophy
Animals
Conceptualization
Philosophical Concepts
Surplus
Novel
Poetry
Ted Hughes
Messianism
Thought
Early Writings

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{fdee1f7640bb4b5d9d324985b53df162,
title = "Reality and philosophy: Reflections on cora diamond's work",
abstract = "The publication of Cora Diamond's important 2002 {"}The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy{"} (in Philosophy and Animal Life) stimulated the writing of this essay. {"}The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy{"} attempted to show that there are experiences of reality (recounted especially in literature like John Coetzee's novels and Ted Hughes' poetry) in relation to which philosophical concepts and words encounter difficulty. The experiences resist conceptualization. By examining several of Diamond's earlier writings, I try to show that the difficulty of philosophical conceptualization of reality is due to the fact that reality does not exist external to experience. Reality being internal to experience means that reality contains an unfixed set of possibilities. Being experiential, reality is historical. The historical dimension of reality-such as the reality of animal life suffering-makes the words through we describe this reality too weak, i.e. they are not powerful enough to capture reality, hence the difficulty. Consequently, as I argue, for Diamond, the weakness of words means that words are never complete concepts. The meaning of them seems always still to come since reality seems always to have a surplus of possibilities. I suggest that because of this always still {"}to come{"} aspect of the meaning of words, we might characterise Diamond's thought as a messianism.",
author = "Lawlor, {Leonard Richard}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9205.2010.01433.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "353--366",
journal = "Philosophical Investigations",
issn = "0190-0536",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Reality and philosophy : Reflections on cora diamond's work. / Lawlor, Leonard Richard.

In: Philosophical Investigations, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.10.2011, p. 353-366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reality and philosophy

T2 - Reflections on cora diamond's work

AU - Lawlor, Leonard Richard

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - The publication of Cora Diamond's important 2002 "The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy" (in Philosophy and Animal Life) stimulated the writing of this essay. "The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy" attempted to show that there are experiences of reality (recounted especially in literature like John Coetzee's novels and Ted Hughes' poetry) in relation to which philosophical concepts and words encounter difficulty. The experiences resist conceptualization. By examining several of Diamond's earlier writings, I try to show that the difficulty of philosophical conceptualization of reality is due to the fact that reality does not exist external to experience. Reality being internal to experience means that reality contains an unfixed set of possibilities. Being experiential, reality is historical. The historical dimension of reality-such as the reality of animal life suffering-makes the words through we describe this reality too weak, i.e. they are not powerful enough to capture reality, hence the difficulty. Consequently, as I argue, for Diamond, the weakness of words means that words are never complete concepts. The meaning of them seems always still to come since reality seems always to have a surplus of possibilities. I suggest that because of this always still "to come" aspect of the meaning of words, we might characterise Diamond's thought as a messianism.

AB - The publication of Cora Diamond's important 2002 "The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy" (in Philosophy and Animal Life) stimulated the writing of this essay. "The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy" attempted to show that there are experiences of reality (recounted especially in literature like John Coetzee's novels and Ted Hughes' poetry) in relation to which philosophical concepts and words encounter difficulty. The experiences resist conceptualization. By examining several of Diamond's earlier writings, I try to show that the difficulty of philosophical conceptualization of reality is due to the fact that reality does not exist external to experience. Reality being internal to experience means that reality contains an unfixed set of possibilities. Being experiential, reality is historical. The historical dimension of reality-such as the reality of animal life suffering-makes the words through we describe this reality too weak, i.e. they are not powerful enough to capture reality, hence the difficulty. Consequently, as I argue, for Diamond, the weakness of words means that words are never complete concepts. The meaning of them seems always still to come since reality seems always to have a surplus of possibilities. I suggest that because of this always still "to come" aspect of the meaning of words, we might characterise Diamond's thought as a messianism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053560064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053560064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9205.2010.01433.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9205.2010.01433.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80053560064

VL - 34

SP - 353

EP - 366

JO - Philosophical Investigations

JF - Philosophical Investigations

SN - 0190-0536

IS - 4

ER -