Reason Taking the Reins From Impulsivity: The Promise of Dual-Systems Thinking for Criminology

Volkan Topalli, Chae Mamayek, Thomas Loughran, Ray Paternoster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aspects of criminological theory are premised on the belief that criminals make poor decisions. There have been suggestions that individual differences in self-control, willpower, impulsivity, time orientation, or more recently, thoughtfully reflective decision making (TRDM) influence choices and, ultimately, deviant outcomes. While much of the literature suggests there are differences among these concepts, they are often used interchangeably or at least noted to share common ground. Using survey data collected from university undergraduate students, this article explores the conceptual and empirical overlap and areas of distinction between key theoretical constructs. Using hypotheses derived from a dual-systems model, findings suggest impulsivity, self-control, temptation, and TRDM are distinct but interrelated constructs. Impulsivity was positively related to intentions to drink and drive in a hypothetical scenario, but temptation, self-control, and TRDM had no significant effect on intentions. Consistent with a dual-systems conceptualization, we found impulsivity and self-control work in tandem, as the risk of drinking and driving was highest for those respondents who were highly impulsive and had low self-control. Future research may seek to use a dual-system model to further reconcile trait-based and decision-based models of criminological theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)426-448
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Contemporary Criminal Justice
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

dual system
self-control
criminology
system model
decision making
scenario
university
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Cite this

@article{8e106b684bed40008b75c0e9f425466e,
title = "Reason Taking the Reins From Impulsivity: The Promise of Dual-Systems Thinking for Criminology",
abstract = "Aspects of criminological theory are premised on the belief that criminals make poor decisions. There have been suggestions that individual differences in self-control, willpower, impulsivity, time orientation, or more recently, thoughtfully reflective decision making (TRDM) influence choices and, ultimately, deviant outcomes. While much of the literature suggests there are differences among these concepts, they are often used interchangeably or at least noted to share common ground. Using survey data collected from university undergraduate students, this article explores the conceptual and empirical overlap and areas of distinction between key theoretical constructs. Using hypotheses derived from a dual-systems model, findings suggest impulsivity, self-control, temptation, and TRDM are distinct but interrelated constructs. Impulsivity was positively related to intentions to drink and drive in a hypothetical scenario, but temptation, self-control, and TRDM had no significant effect on intentions. Consistent with a dual-systems conceptualization, we found impulsivity and self-control work in tandem, as the risk of drinking and driving was highest for those respondents who were highly impulsive and had low self-control. Future research may seek to use a dual-system model to further reconcile trait-based and decision-based models of criminological theory.",
author = "Volkan Topalli and Chae Mamayek and Thomas Loughran and Ray Paternoster",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1043986215608532",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "426--448",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice",
issn = "1043-9862",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Reason Taking the Reins From Impulsivity : The Promise of Dual-Systems Thinking for Criminology. / Topalli, Volkan; Mamayek, Chae; Loughran, Thomas; Paternoster, Ray.

In: Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.11.2015, p. 426-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reason Taking the Reins From Impulsivity

T2 - The Promise of Dual-Systems Thinking for Criminology

AU - Topalli, Volkan

AU - Mamayek, Chae

AU - Loughran, Thomas

AU - Paternoster, Ray

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Aspects of criminological theory are premised on the belief that criminals make poor decisions. There have been suggestions that individual differences in self-control, willpower, impulsivity, time orientation, or more recently, thoughtfully reflective decision making (TRDM) influence choices and, ultimately, deviant outcomes. While much of the literature suggests there are differences among these concepts, they are often used interchangeably or at least noted to share common ground. Using survey data collected from university undergraduate students, this article explores the conceptual and empirical overlap and areas of distinction between key theoretical constructs. Using hypotheses derived from a dual-systems model, findings suggest impulsivity, self-control, temptation, and TRDM are distinct but interrelated constructs. Impulsivity was positively related to intentions to drink and drive in a hypothetical scenario, but temptation, self-control, and TRDM had no significant effect on intentions. Consistent with a dual-systems conceptualization, we found impulsivity and self-control work in tandem, as the risk of drinking and driving was highest for those respondents who were highly impulsive and had low self-control. Future research may seek to use a dual-system model to further reconcile trait-based and decision-based models of criminological theory.

AB - Aspects of criminological theory are premised on the belief that criminals make poor decisions. There have been suggestions that individual differences in self-control, willpower, impulsivity, time orientation, or more recently, thoughtfully reflective decision making (TRDM) influence choices and, ultimately, deviant outcomes. While much of the literature suggests there are differences among these concepts, they are often used interchangeably or at least noted to share common ground. Using survey data collected from university undergraduate students, this article explores the conceptual and empirical overlap and areas of distinction between key theoretical constructs. Using hypotheses derived from a dual-systems model, findings suggest impulsivity, self-control, temptation, and TRDM are distinct but interrelated constructs. Impulsivity was positively related to intentions to drink and drive in a hypothetical scenario, but temptation, self-control, and TRDM had no significant effect on intentions. Consistent with a dual-systems conceptualization, we found impulsivity and self-control work in tandem, as the risk of drinking and driving was highest for those respondents who were highly impulsive and had low self-control. Future research may seek to use a dual-system model to further reconcile trait-based and decision-based models of criminological theory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945194667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945194667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1043986215608532

DO - 10.1177/1043986215608532

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84945194667

VL - 31

SP - 426

EP - 448

JO - Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice

SN - 1043-9862

IS - 4

ER -