Reasonable Suspicion of Child Abuse: Finding a Common Language

Benjamin H. Levi, Sharon G. Portwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the United States, the implementation of a successful system of mandated reporting of suspected child abuse continues to be plagued by the absence of a clear standard for when one must report. All 50 states of the U.S. have laws requiring certain individuals to report suspected child abuse. However, at present, there are variable thresholds for mandated reporting and no clear consensus on how existing thresholds should be interpreted. Because "child abuse" is often present as a possible etiology for injuries and non-infectious conditions that beset children, it is problematic to suggest that "the mere possibility of child abuse" qualifies as cause to report. In an effort to move toward a more effective system of mandated reporting of child maltreatment, this paper discusses how the absence of a clear threshold affects mandated reporters, examines the relevant legal and conceptual issues, and suggests future directions for policy, practice, and research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62-69
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Law, Medicine and Ethics
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

Fingerprint

Child Abuse
Language
Consensus
Wounds and Injuries
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{0211707069c1465d98ed119bb3e9bfb2,
title = "Reasonable Suspicion of Child Abuse: Finding a Common Language",
abstract = "In the United States, the implementation of a successful system of mandated reporting of suspected child abuse continues to be plagued by the absence of a clear standard for when one must report. All 50 states of the U.S. have laws requiring certain individuals to report suspected child abuse. However, at present, there are variable thresholds for mandated reporting and no clear consensus on how existing thresholds should be interpreted. Because {"}child abuse{"} is often present as a possible etiology for injuries and non-infectious conditions that beset children, it is problematic to suggest that {"}the mere possibility of child abuse{"} qualifies as cause to report. In an effort to move toward a more effective system of mandated reporting of child maltreatment, this paper discusses how the absence of a clear threshold affects mandated reporters, examines the relevant legal and conceptual issues, and suggests future directions for policy, practice, and research.",
author = "Levi, {Benjamin H.} and Portwood, {Sharon G.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00550.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "62--69",
journal = "Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics",
issn = "1073-1105",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Reasonable Suspicion of Child Abuse : Finding a Common Language. / Levi, Benjamin H.; Portwood, Sharon G.

In: Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 01.03.2011, p. 62-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reasonable Suspicion of Child Abuse

T2 - Finding a Common Language

AU - Levi, Benjamin H.

AU - Portwood, Sharon G.

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - In the United States, the implementation of a successful system of mandated reporting of suspected child abuse continues to be plagued by the absence of a clear standard for when one must report. All 50 states of the U.S. have laws requiring certain individuals to report suspected child abuse. However, at present, there are variable thresholds for mandated reporting and no clear consensus on how existing thresholds should be interpreted. Because "child abuse" is often present as a possible etiology for injuries and non-infectious conditions that beset children, it is problematic to suggest that "the mere possibility of child abuse" qualifies as cause to report. In an effort to move toward a more effective system of mandated reporting of child maltreatment, this paper discusses how the absence of a clear threshold affects mandated reporters, examines the relevant legal and conceptual issues, and suggests future directions for policy, practice, and research.

AB - In the United States, the implementation of a successful system of mandated reporting of suspected child abuse continues to be plagued by the absence of a clear standard for when one must report. All 50 states of the U.S. have laws requiring certain individuals to report suspected child abuse. However, at present, there are variable thresholds for mandated reporting and no clear consensus on how existing thresholds should be interpreted. Because "child abuse" is often present as a possible etiology for injuries and non-infectious conditions that beset children, it is problematic to suggest that "the mere possibility of child abuse" qualifies as cause to report. In an effort to move toward a more effective system of mandated reporting of child maltreatment, this paper discusses how the absence of a clear threshold affects mandated reporters, examines the relevant legal and conceptual issues, and suggests future directions for policy, practice, and research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951491428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951491428&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00550.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00550.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21314795

AN - SCOPUS:79951491428

VL - 39

SP - 62

EP - 69

JO - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

JF - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics

SN - 1073-1105

IS - 1

ER -