Reasons to strike first

William Buckner, Luke Glowacki

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

De Dreu and Gross predict that attackers will have more difficulty winning conflicts than defenders. As their analysis is presumed to capture the dynamics of decentralized conflict, we consider how their framework compares with ethnographic evidence from small-scale societies, as well as chimpanzee patterns of intergroup conflict. In these contexts, attackers have significantly more success in conflict than predicted by De Dreu and Gross's model. We discuss the possible reasons for this disparity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e119
JournalThe Behavioral and brain sciences
Volume42
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 13 2019

Fingerprint

Pan troglodytes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Buckner, William ; Glowacki, Luke. / Reasons to strike first. In: The Behavioral and brain sciences. 2019 ; Vol. 42. pp. e119.
@article{646467931e1b45438bbe3c3c8e0c8e1c,
title = "Reasons to strike first",
abstract = "De Dreu and Gross predict that attackers will have more difficulty winning conflicts than defenders. As their analysis is presumed to capture the dynamics of decentralized conflict, we consider how their framework compares with ethnographic evidence from small-scale societies, as well as chimpanzee patterns of intergroup conflict. In these contexts, attackers have significantly more success in conflict than predicted by De Dreu and Gross's model. We discuss the possible reasons for this disparity.",
author = "William Buckner and Luke Glowacki",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X19000840",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "e119",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

Reasons to strike first. / Buckner, William; Glowacki, Luke.

In: The Behavioral and brain sciences, Vol. 42, 13.08.2019, p. e119.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reasons to strike first

AU - Buckner, William

AU - Glowacki, Luke

PY - 2019/8/13

Y1 - 2019/8/13

N2 - De Dreu and Gross predict that attackers will have more difficulty winning conflicts than defenders. As their analysis is presumed to capture the dynamics of decentralized conflict, we consider how their framework compares with ethnographic evidence from small-scale societies, as well as chimpanzee patterns of intergroup conflict. In these contexts, attackers have significantly more success in conflict than predicted by De Dreu and Gross's model. We discuss the possible reasons for this disparity.

AB - De Dreu and Gross predict that attackers will have more difficulty winning conflicts than defenders. As their analysis is presumed to capture the dynamics of decentralized conflict, we consider how their framework compares with ethnographic evidence from small-scale societies, as well as chimpanzee patterns of intergroup conflict. In these contexts, attackers have significantly more success in conflict than predicted by De Dreu and Gross's model. We discuss the possible reasons for this disparity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071354657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071354657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X19000840

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X19000840

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 31407996

AN - SCOPUS:85071354657

VL - 42

SP - e119

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

ER -