Reception of Hinduism and Buddhism

Ines G. Županov, Ronnie Po-chia Hsia

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1585, the Third Ecclesiastical Council of Goa, the hub colonial town of Portuguese India, issued an official declaration stating that some of the native Christians, who were recent converts, kept on moving out of the Portuguese territory into the “infidel’ hinterland in order to “return to the caste [tomar casta]’ by performing “diabolical rites of the gentiles’. The way this is done is by going on a pilgrimage to some Pagodas (the temples) and by carrying out ceremonies of expiation helped by their Brahman priest (bragmanes sacer-dotes) and, finally, by drinking “foul drinks [immundicias]’. These apostates then return to Goa and live among the Christians, which causes scandal, because performing such rituals was considered an act in “detestation of the faith [em detestação da fé]’. What may appear as a confusion for our contemporary sense of conversion and apostasy is the fact that in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries caste and religious beliefs of the non-Christian population in India seem to be confounded and interchangeable according to the Portuguese colonial and ecclesiastical administrations. Moreover, the name and concept of “Hinduism’ as a religion of all Hindus does not exist during this period. Even the name “Hindu’, or “indo’, is a scarce word in Portuguese texts and deserves a history of its own. In spite of the lack of use of familiar terms, it is safe to claim that the Portuguese did have a sense that these people, whom they simply called the gentiles (gentios), practised some kind of separate religion, but what exactly it was and how to go about uncovering its secrets was far from clear.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge History of Christianity
Subtitle of host publicationReform and Expansion 1500-1660
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages577-597
Number of pages21
Volume6
ISBN (Electronic)9781139054843
ISBN (Print)9780521811620
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Buddhism
Religion
Names
Caste
Goa
Hinduism
Reception
India
Hinterland
Brahman
History
Declaration
Colonial Administration
Rite
Priests
Religious Beliefs
Temple
Ecclesiastical Administration
Pilgrimage
Drinking

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Županov, I. G., & Hsia, R. P. (2007). Reception of Hinduism and Buddhism. In The Cambridge History of Christianity: Reform and Expansion 1500-1660 (Vol. 6, pp. 577-597). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521811620.031
Županov, Ines G. ; Hsia, Ronnie Po-chia. / Reception of Hinduism and Buddhism. The Cambridge History of Christianity: Reform and Expansion 1500-1660. Vol. 6 Cambridge University Press, 2007. pp. 577-597
@inbook{4c6519492f5e427a9a4b5bc45a45352d,
title = "Reception of Hinduism and Buddhism",
abstract = "In 1585, the Third Ecclesiastical Council of Goa, the hub colonial town of Portuguese India, issued an official declaration stating that some of the native Christians, who were recent converts, kept on moving out of the Portuguese territory into the “infidel’ hinterland in order to “return to the caste [tomar casta]’ by performing “diabolical rites of the gentiles’. The way this is done is by going on a pilgrimage to some Pagodas (the temples) and by carrying out ceremonies of expiation helped by their Brahman priest (bragmanes sacer-dotes) and, finally, by drinking “foul drinks [immundicias]’. These apostates then return to Goa and live among the Christians, which causes scandal, because performing such rituals was considered an act in “detestation of the faith [em detesta{\cc}{\~a}o da f{\'e}]’. What may appear as a confusion for our contemporary sense of conversion and apostasy is the fact that in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries caste and religious beliefs of the non-Christian population in India seem to be confounded and interchangeable according to the Portuguese colonial and ecclesiastical administrations. Moreover, the name and concept of “Hinduism’ as a religion of all Hindus does not exist during this period. Even the name “Hindu’, or “indo’, is a scarce word in Portuguese texts and deserves a history of its own. In spite of the lack of use of familiar terms, it is safe to claim that the Portuguese did have a sense that these people, whom they simply called the gentiles (gentios), practised some kind of separate religion, but what exactly it was and how to go about uncovering its secrets was far from clear.",
author = "Županov, {Ines G.} and Hsia, {Ronnie Po-chia}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CHOL9780521811620.031",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521811620",
volume = "6",
pages = "577--597",
booktitle = "The Cambridge History of Christianity",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Županov, IG & Hsia, RP 2007, Reception of Hinduism and Buddhism. in The Cambridge History of Christianity: Reform and Expansion 1500-1660. vol. 6, Cambridge University Press, pp. 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521811620.031

Reception of Hinduism and Buddhism. / Županov, Ines G.; Hsia, Ronnie Po-chia.

The Cambridge History of Christianity: Reform and Expansion 1500-1660. Vol. 6 Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 577-597.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Reception of Hinduism and Buddhism

AU - Županov, Ines G.

AU - Hsia, Ronnie Po-chia

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - In 1585, the Third Ecclesiastical Council of Goa, the hub colonial town of Portuguese India, issued an official declaration stating that some of the native Christians, who were recent converts, kept on moving out of the Portuguese territory into the “infidel’ hinterland in order to “return to the caste [tomar casta]’ by performing “diabolical rites of the gentiles’. The way this is done is by going on a pilgrimage to some Pagodas (the temples) and by carrying out ceremonies of expiation helped by their Brahman priest (bragmanes sacer-dotes) and, finally, by drinking “foul drinks [immundicias]’. These apostates then return to Goa and live among the Christians, which causes scandal, because performing such rituals was considered an act in “detestation of the faith [em detestação da fé]’. What may appear as a confusion for our contemporary sense of conversion and apostasy is the fact that in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries caste and religious beliefs of the non-Christian population in India seem to be confounded and interchangeable according to the Portuguese colonial and ecclesiastical administrations. Moreover, the name and concept of “Hinduism’ as a religion of all Hindus does not exist during this period. Even the name “Hindu’, or “indo’, is a scarce word in Portuguese texts and deserves a history of its own. In spite of the lack of use of familiar terms, it is safe to claim that the Portuguese did have a sense that these people, whom they simply called the gentiles (gentios), practised some kind of separate religion, but what exactly it was and how to go about uncovering its secrets was far from clear.

AB - In 1585, the Third Ecclesiastical Council of Goa, the hub colonial town of Portuguese India, issued an official declaration stating that some of the native Christians, who were recent converts, kept on moving out of the Portuguese territory into the “infidel’ hinterland in order to “return to the caste [tomar casta]’ by performing “diabolical rites of the gentiles’. The way this is done is by going on a pilgrimage to some Pagodas (the temples) and by carrying out ceremonies of expiation helped by their Brahman priest (bragmanes sacer-dotes) and, finally, by drinking “foul drinks [immundicias]’. These apostates then return to Goa and live among the Christians, which causes scandal, because performing such rituals was considered an act in “detestation of the faith [em detestação da fé]’. What may appear as a confusion for our contemporary sense of conversion and apostasy is the fact that in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries caste and religious beliefs of the non-Christian population in India seem to be confounded and interchangeable according to the Portuguese colonial and ecclesiastical administrations. Moreover, the name and concept of “Hinduism’ as a religion of all Hindus does not exist during this period. Even the name “Hindu’, or “indo’, is a scarce word in Portuguese texts and deserves a history of its own. In spite of the lack of use of familiar terms, it is safe to claim that the Portuguese did have a sense that these people, whom they simply called the gentiles (gentios), practised some kind of separate religion, but what exactly it was and how to go about uncovering its secrets was far from clear.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918867414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918867414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CHOL9780521811620.031

DO - 10.1017/CHOL9780521811620.031

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780521811620

VL - 6

SP - 577

EP - 597

BT - The Cambridge History of Christianity

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Županov IG, Hsia RP. Reception of Hinduism and Buddhism. In The Cambridge History of Christianity: Reform and Expansion 1500-1660. Vol. 6. Cambridge University Press. 2007. p. 577-597 https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521811620.031