Reconsidering 'trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series'

David N. DeJong, Charles H. Whiteman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We employ a Bayesian perspective to identify the type of prior needed to support the inference that most macroeconomic time series follow random walks. For many of the series considered by Nelson and Plosser (1982) the required prior involves assigning very low probability to trendstationary alternatives. When this prior is relaxed trend-stationarity is generally supported, thus the unit root inference seems inappropriate for these series: despite Nelson and Plosser's results indicating that macroeconomic time series are not inconsistent with the random walk hypothesis, our results indicate that for most series the trend-stationarity hypothesis is much more likely.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-254
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Monetary Economics
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991

Fingerprint

Random walk
Trend stationarity
Macroeconomics
Inference
Lower probabilities
Unit root
Random walk hypothesis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{5cf5174dcaf44e8e8c921850aa596e1f,
title = "Reconsidering 'trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series'",
abstract = "We employ a Bayesian perspective to identify the type of prior needed to support the inference that most macroeconomic time series follow random walks. For many of the series considered by Nelson and Plosser (1982) the required prior involves assigning very low probability to trendstationary alternatives. When this prior is relaxed trend-stationarity is generally supported, thus the unit root inference seems inappropriate for these series: despite Nelson and Plosser's results indicating that macroeconomic time series are not inconsistent with the random walk hypothesis, our results indicate that for most series the trend-stationarity hypothesis is much more likely.",
author = "DeJong, {David N.} and Whiteman, {Charles H.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0304-3932(91)90051-O",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "221--254",
journal = "Journal of Monetary Economics",
issn = "0304-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Reconsidering 'trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series'. / DeJong, David N.; Whiteman, Charles H.

In: Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 28, No. 2, 01.01.1991, p. 221-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconsidering 'trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series'

AU - DeJong, David N.

AU - Whiteman, Charles H.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - We employ a Bayesian perspective to identify the type of prior needed to support the inference that most macroeconomic time series follow random walks. For many of the series considered by Nelson and Plosser (1982) the required prior involves assigning very low probability to trendstationary alternatives. When this prior is relaxed trend-stationarity is generally supported, thus the unit root inference seems inappropriate for these series: despite Nelson and Plosser's results indicating that macroeconomic time series are not inconsistent with the random walk hypothesis, our results indicate that for most series the trend-stationarity hypothesis is much more likely.

AB - We employ a Bayesian perspective to identify the type of prior needed to support the inference that most macroeconomic time series follow random walks. For many of the series considered by Nelson and Plosser (1982) the required prior involves assigning very low probability to trendstationary alternatives. When this prior is relaxed trend-stationarity is generally supported, thus the unit root inference seems inappropriate for these series: despite Nelson and Plosser's results indicating that macroeconomic time series are not inconsistent with the random walk hypothesis, our results indicate that for most series the trend-stationarity hypothesis is much more likely.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042647966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042647966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0304-3932(91)90051-O

DO - 10.1016/0304-3932(91)90051-O

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 221

EP - 254

JO - Journal of Monetary Economics

JF - Journal of Monetary Economics

SN - 0304-3932

IS - 2

ER -