Reconstituting the utopian vision of making: HCI after technosolutionism

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    75 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    HCI research has both endorsed "making" for its innovation and democratization capacity and critiqued its underlying technosolutionism, i.e., the idea that technology provides solutions to complex social problems. This paper offers a reflexive-interventionist approach that simultaneously takes seriously the critiques of making's claims as technosolutionist while also embracing its utopian project as worth reconstituting in broader sociopolitical terms. It applies anthropological theory of the global and feministutopianism to the analysis of findings from research on making cultures in Taiwan and China. More specifically, the paper provides ethnographic snippets of utopian glimmers in order to speculatively imagine and explore alternative futures of making worth pursuing, and in so doing reconstitute the utopian vision of making.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationCHI 2016 - Proceedings, 34th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
    Pages1390-1402
    Number of pages13
    ISBN (Electronic)9781450333627
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 7 2016
    Event34th Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2016 - San Jose, United States
    Duration: May 7 2016May 12 2016

    Publication series

    NameConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

    Other

    Other34th Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2016
    CountryUnited States
    CitySan Jose
    Period5/7/165/12/16

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Software
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reconstituting the utopian vision of making: HCI after technosolutionism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this