TY - JOUR
T1 - Recruiting and retaining first-year college students in online health research
T2 - Implementation considerations
AU - Guastaferro, K.
AU - Tanner, A. E.
AU - Rulison, K. L.
AU - Miller, A. M.
AU - Milroy, J. J.
AU - Wyrick, D. L.
AU - Collins, Linda Marie
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award AA022931 and HD089922.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective: Decreasing participation in intervention research among college students has implications for the external validity of behavioral intervention research. We describe recruitment and retention strategies used to promote participation in intervention research across a series of four randomized experiments. Method: We report the recruitment and retention rates by school for each experiment and qualitative feedback from students about recommendations for improving research participation. Results: There was considerable variation among schools’ recruitment (4.9% to 64.7%) and retention (12% to 67.8%) rates. Student feedback suggested study timing (e.g., early in the semester), communication strategies (e.g., social media), and incentive structure (e.g., guaranteed incentives) could improve research participation. The highest survey participation rate was observed at the university which mandated students to complete the intervention (but not the survey). Conclusions: Intervention scientists must consider the population and study context to make informed decisions related to recruitment and retention strategies.
AB - Objective: Decreasing participation in intervention research among college students has implications for the external validity of behavioral intervention research. We describe recruitment and retention strategies used to promote participation in intervention research across a series of four randomized experiments. Method: We report the recruitment and retention rates by school for each experiment and qualitative feedback from students about recommendations for improving research participation. Results: There was considerable variation among schools’ recruitment (4.9% to 64.7%) and retention (12% to 67.8%) rates. Student feedback suggested study timing (e.g., early in the semester), communication strategies (e.g., social media), and incentive structure (e.g., guaranteed incentives) could improve research participation. The highest survey participation rate was observed at the university which mandated students to complete the intervention (but not the survey). Conclusions: Intervention scientists must consider the population and study context to make informed decisions related to recruitment and retention strategies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127144380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127144380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07448481.2022.2053132
DO - 10.1080/07448481.2022.2053132
M3 - Article
C2 - 35325589
AN - SCOPUS:85127144380
SN - 0744-8481
JO - Journal of American College Health
JF - Journal of American College Health
ER -