(Re)Designing for Part Consolidation

Understanding the Challenges of Metal Additive Manufacturing

John Schmelzle, Eric V. Kline, Corey J. Dickman, Edward William Reutzel, Griffin Jones, Timothy William Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) of metallic parts provides engineers with unprecedented design freedom. This enables designers to consolidate assemblies, lightweight designs, create intricate internal geometries for enhanced fluid flow or heat transfer performance, and fabricate complex components that previously could not be manufactured. While these design benefits may come " free" in many cases, it necessitates an understanding of the limitations and capabilities of the specific AM process used for production, the system-level design intent, and the postprocessing and inspection/qualification implications. Unfortunately, design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) guidelines for metal AM processes are nascent given the rapid advancements in metal AM technology recently. In this paper, we present a case study to provide insight into the challenges that engineers face when redesigning a multicomponent assembly into a single component fabricated using laser-based powder bed fusion for metal AM. In this case, part consolidation is used to reduce the weight by 60% and height by 53% of a multipart assembly while improving performance and minimizing leak points. Fabrication, postprocessing, and inspection issues are also discussed along with the implications on design. A generalized design approach for consolidating parts is presented to help designers realize the freedoms that metal AM provides, and numerous areas for investigation to improve DfAM are also highlighted and illustrated throughout the case study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number111711
JournalJournal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME
Volume137
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

3D printers
Consolidation
Metals
Inspection
Engineers
Flow of fluids
Fusion reactions
Heat transfer
Powders
Fabrication

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Cite this

@article{e24ac0cb834c499ab6f75a28dce175b6,
title = "(Re)Designing for Part Consolidation: Understanding the Challenges of Metal Additive Manufacturing",
abstract = "Additive manufacturing (AM) of metallic parts provides engineers with unprecedented design freedom. This enables designers to consolidate assemblies, lightweight designs, create intricate internal geometries for enhanced fluid flow or heat transfer performance, and fabricate complex components that previously could not be manufactured. While these design benefits may come {"} free{"} in many cases, it necessitates an understanding of the limitations and capabilities of the specific AM process used for production, the system-level design intent, and the postprocessing and inspection/qualification implications. Unfortunately, design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) guidelines for metal AM processes are nascent given the rapid advancements in metal AM technology recently. In this paper, we present a case study to provide insight into the challenges that engineers face when redesigning a multicomponent assembly into a single component fabricated using laser-based powder bed fusion for metal AM. In this case, part consolidation is used to reduce the weight by 60{\%} and height by 53{\%} of a multipart assembly while improving performance and minimizing leak points. Fabrication, postprocessing, and inspection issues are also discussed along with the implications on design. A generalized design approach for consolidating parts is presented to help designers realize the freedoms that metal AM provides, and numerous areas for investigation to improve DfAM are also highlighted and illustrated throughout the case study.",
author = "John Schmelzle and Kline, {Eric V.} and Dickman, {Corey J.} and Reutzel, {Edward William} and Griffin Jones and Simpson, {Timothy William}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/1.4031156",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
journal = "Journal of Mechanical Design - Transactions of the ASME",
issn = "1050-0472",
publisher = "ASME",
number = "11",

}

(Re)Designing for Part Consolidation : Understanding the Challenges of Metal Additive Manufacturing. / Schmelzle, John; Kline, Eric V.; Dickman, Corey J.; Reutzel, Edward William; Jones, Griffin; Simpson, Timothy William.

In: Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 137, No. 11, 111711, 01.11.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Re)Designing for Part Consolidation

T2 - Understanding the Challenges of Metal Additive Manufacturing

AU - Schmelzle, John

AU - Kline, Eric V.

AU - Dickman, Corey J.

AU - Reutzel, Edward William

AU - Jones, Griffin

AU - Simpson, Timothy William

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Additive manufacturing (AM) of metallic parts provides engineers with unprecedented design freedom. This enables designers to consolidate assemblies, lightweight designs, create intricate internal geometries for enhanced fluid flow or heat transfer performance, and fabricate complex components that previously could not be manufactured. While these design benefits may come " free" in many cases, it necessitates an understanding of the limitations and capabilities of the specific AM process used for production, the system-level design intent, and the postprocessing and inspection/qualification implications. Unfortunately, design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) guidelines for metal AM processes are nascent given the rapid advancements in metal AM technology recently. In this paper, we present a case study to provide insight into the challenges that engineers face when redesigning a multicomponent assembly into a single component fabricated using laser-based powder bed fusion for metal AM. In this case, part consolidation is used to reduce the weight by 60% and height by 53% of a multipart assembly while improving performance and minimizing leak points. Fabrication, postprocessing, and inspection issues are also discussed along with the implications on design. A generalized design approach for consolidating parts is presented to help designers realize the freedoms that metal AM provides, and numerous areas for investigation to improve DfAM are also highlighted and illustrated throughout the case study.

AB - Additive manufacturing (AM) of metallic parts provides engineers with unprecedented design freedom. This enables designers to consolidate assemblies, lightweight designs, create intricate internal geometries for enhanced fluid flow or heat transfer performance, and fabricate complex components that previously could not be manufactured. While these design benefits may come " free" in many cases, it necessitates an understanding of the limitations and capabilities of the specific AM process used for production, the system-level design intent, and the postprocessing and inspection/qualification implications. Unfortunately, design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) guidelines for metal AM processes are nascent given the rapid advancements in metal AM technology recently. In this paper, we present a case study to provide insight into the challenges that engineers face when redesigning a multicomponent assembly into a single component fabricated using laser-based powder bed fusion for metal AM. In this case, part consolidation is used to reduce the weight by 60% and height by 53% of a multipart assembly while improving performance and minimizing leak points. Fabrication, postprocessing, and inspection issues are also discussed along with the implications on design. A generalized design approach for consolidating parts is presented to help designers realize the freedoms that metal AM provides, and numerous areas for investigation to improve DfAM are also highlighted and illustrated throughout the case study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944220461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944220461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/1.4031156

DO - 10.1115/1.4031156

M3 - Article

VL - 137

JO - Journal of Mechanical Design - Transactions of the ASME

JF - Journal of Mechanical Design - Transactions of the ASME

SN - 1050-0472

IS - 11

M1 - 111711

ER -