Reducing soil contamination

Economic incentives and potential benefits

François Bonnieux, Alain Carpentier, Robert D. Weaver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although soil contamination has received increased attention in the EU because of the potential consequences for human health and for both air and water pollution, soil contaminant flows are an issue in their own right. Control of pollutants has high priority and has resulted in a number of directives to reduce emissions. Pesticides pose a crucial problem because these chemicals are applied to crops across the agricultural sector and therefore, constitute a non-point source of soil contamination. This paper reconsiders the basic economics of contaminant flows from both private and public perspectives. Firstly, the microeconomics of pollution control are presented, followed by a discussion of alternative policy approaches. Then the economics of restoration of damaged natural assets are considered. The case of pesticide use in agriculture is presented to illustrate lessons drawn from more general economic theory. Estimation of costs and benefits of restoration is considered and the challenges it poses to policy design are discussed. A final section reviews the economics of public policy for the restoration of contaminated soils and highlights current EU policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-288
Number of pages14
JournalAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
Volume67
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 1998

Fingerprint

economic incentives
soil pollution
pollutant
pesticides
pesticide
economics
microeconomics
economic theory
economic policy
policy approach
soil
public policy
pollution control
agricultural industry
assets
air pollution
water pollution
polluted soils
human health
atmospheric pollution

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

@article{0a850f3a73aa4d0fb058ba47c7fb9a7f,
title = "Reducing soil contamination: Economic incentives and potential benefits",
abstract = "Although soil contamination has received increased attention in the EU because of the potential consequences for human health and for both air and water pollution, soil contaminant flows are an issue in their own right. Control of pollutants has high priority and has resulted in a number of directives to reduce emissions. Pesticides pose a crucial problem because these chemicals are applied to crops across the agricultural sector and therefore, constitute a non-point source of soil contamination. This paper reconsiders the basic economics of contaminant flows from both private and public perspectives. Firstly, the microeconomics of pollution control are presented, followed by a discussion of alternative policy approaches. Then the economics of restoration of damaged natural assets are considered. The case of pesticide use in agriculture is presented to illustrate lessons drawn from more general economic theory. Estimation of costs and benefits of restoration is considered and the challenges it poses to policy design are discussed. A final section reviews the economics of public policy for the restoration of contaminated soils and highlights current EU policy.",
author = "Fran{\cc}ois Bonnieux and Alain Carpentier and Weaver, {Robert D.}",
year = "1998",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00125-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "275--288",
journal = "Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment",
issn = "0167-8809",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2-3",

}

Reducing soil contamination : Economic incentives and potential benefits. / Bonnieux, François; Carpentier, Alain; Weaver, Robert D.

In: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Vol. 67, No. 2-3, 01.02.1998, p. 275-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reducing soil contamination

T2 - Economic incentives and potential benefits

AU - Bonnieux, François

AU - Carpentier, Alain

AU - Weaver, Robert D.

PY - 1998/2/1

Y1 - 1998/2/1

N2 - Although soil contamination has received increased attention in the EU because of the potential consequences for human health and for both air and water pollution, soil contaminant flows are an issue in their own right. Control of pollutants has high priority and has resulted in a number of directives to reduce emissions. Pesticides pose a crucial problem because these chemicals are applied to crops across the agricultural sector and therefore, constitute a non-point source of soil contamination. This paper reconsiders the basic economics of contaminant flows from both private and public perspectives. Firstly, the microeconomics of pollution control are presented, followed by a discussion of alternative policy approaches. Then the economics of restoration of damaged natural assets are considered. The case of pesticide use in agriculture is presented to illustrate lessons drawn from more general economic theory. Estimation of costs and benefits of restoration is considered and the challenges it poses to policy design are discussed. A final section reviews the economics of public policy for the restoration of contaminated soils and highlights current EU policy.

AB - Although soil contamination has received increased attention in the EU because of the potential consequences for human health and for both air and water pollution, soil contaminant flows are an issue in their own right. Control of pollutants has high priority and has resulted in a number of directives to reduce emissions. Pesticides pose a crucial problem because these chemicals are applied to crops across the agricultural sector and therefore, constitute a non-point source of soil contamination. This paper reconsiders the basic economics of contaminant flows from both private and public perspectives. Firstly, the microeconomics of pollution control are presented, followed by a discussion of alternative policy approaches. Then the economics of restoration of damaged natural assets are considered. The case of pesticide use in agriculture is presented to illustrate lessons drawn from more general economic theory. Estimation of costs and benefits of restoration is considered and the challenges it poses to policy design are discussed. A final section reviews the economics of public policy for the restoration of contaminated soils and highlights current EU policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031967743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031967743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00125-4

DO - 10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00125-4

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 275

EP - 288

JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

SN - 0167-8809

IS - 2-3

ER -