TY - JOUR
T1 - Reference frames and geographic scale
T2 - understanding their relationship in environmental learning
AU - Zhao, Jiayan
AU - Ma, Xiaochuan
AU - Simpson, Mark
AU - Sajjadi, Pejman
AU - Wallgrün, Jan Oliver
AU - Klippel, Alexander
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number [1526520]. We thank the anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions helped improve and clarify this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Cartography and Geographic Information Society.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Reference frames provide structure for spatial cognition and support spatial knowledge development across different scales. This study sheds light on the relationship between geographic scale, defined as the spatial extent visually accessible from a single viewpoint, and the preferential use of different reference frames (egocentric vs. allocentric) for environmental learning. Participants learned target locations by teleporting through a virtual maze. Leveraging the flexibility and potential of immersive technologies, we manipulated geographic scale using two perspectives, a ground-level view and a pseudo-aerial view, to examine how reference frame proclivity (determined by an established test) affects spatial learning at each scale. The results of a pointing task show that participants who preferred an allocentric reference frame benefited from the pseudo-aerial perspective, whereas participants who preferred an egocentric reference frame made more efficient use of the ground perspective. A fine-grained behavioral and cognitive analysis provides concrete explanations for differences in task performance and offers evidence for the existence of egocentric survey representations. The results are essential for understanding how immersive technologies change spatial learning.
AB - Reference frames provide structure for spatial cognition and support spatial knowledge development across different scales. This study sheds light on the relationship between geographic scale, defined as the spatial extent visually accessible from a single viewpoint, and the preferential use of different reference frames (egocentric vs. allocentric) for environmental learning. Participants learned target locations by teleporting through a virtual maze. Leveraging the flexibility and potential of immersive technologies, we manipulated geographic scale using two perspectives, a ground-level view and a pseudo-aerial view, to examine how reference frame proclivity (determined by an established test) affects spatial learning at each scale. The results of a pointing task show that participants who preferred an allocentric reference frame benefited from the pseudo-aerial perspective, whereas participants who preferred an egocentric reference frame made more efficient use of the ground perspective. A fine-grained behavioral and cognitive analysis provides concrete explanations for differences in task performance and offers evidence for the existence of egocentric survey representations. The results are essential for understanding how immersive technologies change spatial learning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109914279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109914279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15230406.2021.1942219
DO - 10.1080/15230406.2021.1942219
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85109914279
SN - 1523-0406
VL - 49
SP - 70
EP - 84
JO - Cartography and Geographic Information Science
JF - Cartography and Geographic Information Science
IS - 1
ER -