Reference Points Used in Quality and Value Judgements

Amna Kirmani, Johann Baumgartner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose that a fundamental difference between quality and value judgments is that consumers rely more on internal standards (i.e., information stored in memory) to evaluate a brands quality and external standards (i.e., reference brands available in the evaluation context) to assess a brands value. Since internal standards are relatively stable and external reference brands may change across contexts, value judgments are more context-dependent than quality judgments. In addition, we propose that the relative invariance of quality ratings to contextual product information will hold only for consumers who are relatively familiar with the product category and the target brand. To examine the underlying mechanisms, an experimental study varies task, comparison brand information and familiarity and uses a process tracing methodology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-310
Number of pages12
JournalMarketing Letters
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Value judgements
Reference point
Process tracing
Evaluation
Product category
Rating
Familiarity
Experimental study
Brand value
Invariance
Product information
Methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{aa3da884b3fb49058b1ac6a25347fd35,
title = "Reference Points Used in Quality and Value Judgements",
abstract = "We propose that a fundamental difference between quality and value judgments is that consumers rely more on internal standards (i.e., information stored in memory) to evaluate a brands quality and external standards (i.e., reference brands available in the evaluation context) to assess a brands value. Since internal standards are relatively stable and external reference brands may change across contexts, value judgments are more context-dependent than quality judgments. In addition, we propose that the relative invariance of quality ratings to contextual product information will hold only for consumers who are relatively familiar with the product category and the target brand. To examine the underlying mechanisms, an experimental study varies task, comparison brand information and familiarity and uses a process tracing methodology.",
author = "Amna Kirmani and Johann Baumgartner",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1008129011202",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "299--310",
journal = "Marketing Letters",
issn = "0923-0645",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

Reference Points Used in Quality and Value Judgements. / Kirmani, Amna; Baumgartner, Johann.

In: Marketing Letters, Vol. 11, No. 4, 01.01.2000, p. 299-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reference Points Used in Quality and Value Judgements

AU - Kirmani, Amna

AU - Baumgartner, Johann

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - We propose that a fundamental difference between quality and value judgments is that consumers rely more on internal standards (i.e., information stored in memory) to evaluate a brands quality and external standards (i.e., reference brands available in the evaluation context) to assess a brands value. Since internal standards are relatively stable and external reference brands may change across contexts, value judgments are more context-dependent than quality judgments. In addition, we propose that the relative invariance of quality ratings to contextual product information will hold only for consumers who are relatively familiar with the product category and the target brand. To examine the underlying mechanisms, an experimental study varies task, comparison brand information and familiarity and uses a process tracing methodology.

AB - We propose that a fundamental difference between quality and value judgments is that consumers rely more on internal standards (i.e., information stored in memory) to evaluate a brands quality and external standards (i.e., reference brands available in the evaluation context) to assess a brands value. Since internal standards are relatively stable and external reference brands may change across contexts, value judgments are more context-dependent than quality judgments. In addition, we propose that the relative invariance of quality ratings to contextual product information will hold only for consumers who are relatively familiar with the product category and the target brand. To examine the underlying mechanisms, an experimental study varies task, comparison brand information and familiarity and uses a process tracing methodology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347935723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347935723&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1008129011202

DO - 10.1023/A:1008129011202

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0347935723

VL - 11

SP - 299

EP - 310

JO - Marketing Letters

JF - Marketing Letters

SN - 0923-0645

IS - 4

ER -