TY - JOUR
T1 - Refining the definition of biochemical failure in the era of stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer
T2 - The Phoenix definition and beyond: Definition of BCF in Prostate SBRT
AU - Ma, Ting Martin
AU - Roy, Soumyajit
AU - Wu, Xue
AU - Mantz, Constantine
AU - Fuller, Donald
AU - Miszczyk, Leszek
AU - Napieralska, Alexandra
AU - Namysł-Kaletka, Agnieska
AU - Bagshaw, Hilary P.
AU - Buyyounouski, Mark K.
AU - Glicksman, Rachel
AU - Loblaw, D. Andrew
AU - Katz, Alan
AU - Upadhyaya, Shrinivasa K.
AU - Nickols, Nicholas
AU - Steinberg, Michael L.
AU - Philipson, Rebecca
AU - Aghdam, Nima
AU - Suy, Simeng
AU - Pepin, Abigail
AU - Collins, Sean P.
AU - Boutros, Paul
AU - Rettig, Matthew B.
AU - Calais, Jeremie
AU - Wang, Ming
AU - Zaorsky, Nicholas
AU - Kishan, Amar U.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding support for this study comes from the Prostate Cancer Foundation and ASTRO to A.U.K.
Funding Information:
A.U.K. reports funding support from grant P50CA09213 from the Prostate Cancer National Institutes of Health Specialized Programs of Research Excellence, as well as grant RSD1836 from the Radiological Society of North America, the STOP Cancer organization, the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, and the Prostate Cancer Foundation. N.N. reports research support from Janssen and Lantheus, and consulting for Oncolinea. All other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background and purpose: The Phoenix definition for biochemical failure (BCF) after radiotherapy uses nadir PSA (nPSA) + 2 ng/mL to classify a BCF and was derived from conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, which produces significantly higher nPSAs than stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We investigated whether an alternative nPSA-based threshold could be used to define post-SBRT BCFs. Materials and methods: PSA kinetics data on 2038 patients from 9 institutions were retrospectively analyzed for low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients treated with SBRT without ADT. We evaluated the performance of various nPSA-based definitions. We also investigated the relationship of relative PSA decline (rPSA, PSA18month/PSA6month) and timing of reaching nPSA + 2 with BCF. Results: Median follow-up was 71.9 months. BCF occurred in 6.9% of patients. Median nPSA was 0.16 ng/mL. False positivity of nPSA + 2 was 30.2%, compared to 40.9%, 57.8%, and 71.0% for nPSA + 1.5, nPSA + 1.0, and nPSA + 0.5, respectively. Among patients with BCF, the median lead time gained from an earlier nPSA + threshold definition over the Phoenix definition was minimal. Patients with BCF had significantly lower rates of early PSA decline (mean rPSA 1.19 vs. 0.39, p < 0.0001) and were significantly more likely to reach nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months (83.3% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.0001). The proposed criterion (rPSA ≥ 2.6 or nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months) had a sensitivity and specificity of 92.4% and 81.5%, respectively, for predicting BCF in patients meeting the Phoenix definition and decreased its false positivity to 6.4%. Conclusion: The Phoenix definition remains an excellent definition for BCF post-SBRT. Its high false positivity can be mitigated by applying additional criteria (rPSA ≥ 2.6 or time to nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months).
AB - Background and purpose: The Phoenix definition for biochemical failure (BCF) after radiotherapy uses nadir PSA (nPSA) + 2 ng/mL to classify a BCF and was derived from conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, which produces significantly higher nPSAs than stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We investigated whether an alternative nPSA-based threshold could be used to define post-SBRT BCFs. Materials and methods: PSA kinetics data on 2038 patients from 9 institutions were retrospectively analyzed for low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients treated with SBRT without ADT. We evaluated the performance of various nPSA-based definitions. We also investigated the relationship of relative PSA decline (rPSA, PSA18month/PSA6month) and timing of reaching nPSA + 2 with BCF. Results: Median follow-up was 71.9 months. BCF occurred in 6.9% of patients. Median nPSA was 0.16 ng/mL. False positivity of nPSA + 2 was 30.2%, compared to 40.9%, 57.8%, and 71.0% for nPSA + 1.5, nPSA + 1.0, and nPSA + 0.5, respectively. Among patients with BCF, the median lead time gained from an earlier nPSA + threshold definition over the Phoenix definition was minimal. Patients with BCF had significantly lower rates of early PSA decline (mean rPSA 1.19 vs. 0.39, p < 0.0001) and were significantly more likely to reach nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months (83.3% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.0001). The proposed criterion (rPSA ≥ 2.6 or nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months) had a sensitivity and specificity of 92.4% and 81.5%, respectively, for predicting BCF in patients meeting the Phoenix definition and decreased its false positivity to 6.4%. Conclusion: The Phoenix definition remains an excellent definition for BCF post-SBRT. Its high false positivity can be mitigated by applying additional criteria (rPSA ≥ 2.6 or time to nPSA + 2 ≥ 18 months).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119613389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119613389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.005
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 34774650
AN - SCOPUS:85119613389
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 166
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
ER -