Reflections on Academic Liberalism and Conservative Criticism

Matthew Woessner, April Kelly-Woessner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Liberal bias in academia is a complex sociological issue. The empirical evidence suggests that part of the explanation for ideological imbalance is that conservatives tend to self-select out of careers in higher education. We examine the explanation offered by Neil Gross that political-typing is partially responsible. While we are generally receptive to this explanation, our own research provides some evidence that college students do not find academia to be a hostile or unpleasant place. This raises some questions about why they would self-select out of careers in academia. We also offer alternative explanations for conservative criticism of the academy and suggest that institutions of higher education have some responsibility for creating the impression that they are hostile to conservative views.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-41
Number of pages7
JournalSociety
Volume52
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reflections on Academic Liberalism and Conservative Criticism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this