Reforming the lifeline program: Regulatory federalism in action?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper considers whether common national standards for determining participants’ eligibility and designating service providers in the Lifeline program are preferable to a decentralized system where state utility commissions have greater influence over these program parameters. Two recent decisions of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a 2016 Order and its reversal in March 2017, on the designation of Eligible Telecommunications Carriers to provide broadband Lifeline service, centered on this question. Statistical analysis of program data demonstrates that state-by-state variations in enrollment may be attributed to state-level policy actions, after controlling for alternative demographic and economic explanations. This paper concludes that national standards may reduce state-by-state variations in program participation rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-75
Number of pages9
JournalTelecommunications Policy
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Reforming reactions
federalism
Telecommunication
Statistical methods
Economics
Communication
statistical analysis
service provider
telecommunication
communications
participation
economics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Information Systems
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{d8d6939a9c3f4860a1fbd684344f25bf,
title = "Reforming the lifeline program: Regulatory federalism in action?",
abstract = "This paper considers whether common national standards for determining participants’ eligibility and designating service providers in the Lifeline program are preferable to a decentralized system where state utility commissions have greater influence over these program parameters. Two recent decisions of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a 2016 Order and its reversal in March 2017, on the designation of Eligible Telecommunications Carriers to provide broadband Lifeline service, centered on this question. Statistical analysis of program data demonstrates that state-by-state variations in enrollment may be attributed to state-level policy actions, after controlling for alternative demographic and economic explanations. This paper concludes that national standards may reduce state-by-state variations in program participation rates.",
author = "Jayakar, {Krishna Prasad} and Park, {Eun A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.telpol.2018.04.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "67--75",
journal = "Telecommunications Policy",
issn = "0308-5961",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

Reforming the lifeline program : Regulatory federalism in action? / Jayakar, Krishna Prasad; Park, Eun A.

In: Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 67-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reforming the lifeline program

T2 - Regulatory federalism in action?

AU - Jayakar, Krishna Prasad

AU - Park, Eun A.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - This paper considers whether common national standards for determining participants’ eligibility and designating service providers in the Lifeline program are preferable to a decentralized system where state utility commissions have greater influence over these program parameters. Two recent decisions of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a 2016 Order and its reversal in March 2017, on the designation of Eligible Telecommunications Carriers to provide broadband Lifeline service, centered on this question. Statistical analysis of program data demonstrates that state-by-state variations in enrollment may be attributed to state-level policy actions, after controlling for alternative demographic and economic explanations. This paper concludes that national standards may reduce state-by-state variations in program participation rates.

AB - This paper considers whether common national standards for determining participants’ eligibility and designating service providers in the Lifeline program are preferable to a decentralized system where state utility commissions have greater influence over these program parameters. Two recent decisions of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a 2016 Order and its reversal in March 2017, on the designation of Eligible Telecommunications Carriers to provide broadband Lifeline service, centered on this question. Statistical analysis of program data demonstrates that state-by-state variations in enrollment may be attributed to state-level policy actions, after controlling for alternative demographic and economic explanations. This paper concludes that national standards may reduce state-by-state variations in program participation rates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052812750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052812750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.telpol.2018.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.telpol.2018.04.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052812750

VL - 43

SP - 67

EP - 75

JO - Telecommunications Policy

JF - Telecommunications Policy

SN - 0308-5961

IS - 1

ER -