Reframing concussions, masculinity, and NFL mythology in League of Denial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores how the PBS Frontline documentary League of Denial reframes the “concussion crisis” in three ways that contest the rationalization of injury and the normalization of violence in the hegemonic masculine discourses (visual, written, oral) produced about professional football. First, the film problematizes the notion of head injury as merely “part of the game” and a risk that players ostensibly understand when they enter the National Football League. Second, the film’s depiction of Mike Webster’s “unruly” body further de-naturalizes concussions and contests the masculine ideal of bodily sacrifice in pro football. Third, the film explicitly critiques the role of sports media in constructing a mythology and spectacle of pro football that contributed to the cultural context in which the concussion crisis has emerged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-57
Number of pages9
JournalPopular Communication
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2016

Fingerprint

mythology
masculinity
rationalization
normalization
Sports
violence
discourse

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication

Cite this

@article{47dfe0261ec64668bcd93a661f3e5184,
title = "Reframing concussions, masculinity, and NFL mythology in League of Denial",
abstract = "This article explores how the PBS Frontline documentary League of Denial reframes the “concussion crisis” in three ways that contest the rationalization of injury and the normalization of violence in the hegemonic masculine discourses (visual, written, oral) produced about professional football. First, the film problematizes the notion of head injury as merely “part of the game” and a risk that players ostensibly understand when they enter the National Football League. Second, the film’s depiction of Mike Webster’s “unruly” body further de-naturalizes concussions and contests the masculine ideal of bodily sacrifice in pro football. Third, the film explicitly critiques the role of sports media in constructing a mythology and spectacle of pro football that contributed to the cultural context in which the concussion crisis has emerged.",
author = "Furness, {Zachary M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/15405702.2015.1084628",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "49--57",
journal = "Popular Communication",
issn = "1540-5702",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Reframing concussions, masculinity, and NFL mythology in League of Denial. / Furness, Zachary M.

In: Popular Communication, Vol. 14, No. 1, 02.01.2016, p. 49-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reframing concussions, masculinity, and NFL mythology in League of Denial

AU - Furness, Zachary M.

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - This article explores how the PBS Frontline documentary League of Denial reframes the “concussion crisis” in three ways that contest the rationalization of injury and the normalization of violence in the hegemonic masculine discourses (visual, written, oral) produced about professional football. First, the film problematizes the notion of head injury as merely “part of the game” and a risk that players ostensibly understand when they enter the National Football League. Second, the film’s depiction of Mike Webster’s “unruly” body further de-naturalizes concussions and contests the masculine ideal of bodily sacrifice in pro football. Third, the film explicitly critiques the role of sports media in constructing a mythology and spectacle of pro football that contributed to the cultural context in which the concussion crisis has emerged.

AB - This article explores how the PBS Frontline documentary League of Denial reframes the “concussion crisis” in three ways that contest the rationalization of injury and the normalization of violence in the hegemonic masculine discourses (visual, written, oral) produced about professional football. First, the film problematizes the notion of head injury as merely “part of the game” and a risk that players ostensibly understand when they enter the National Football League. Second, the film’s depiction of Mike Webster’s “unruly” body further de-naturalizes concussions and contests the masculine ideal of bodily sacrifice in pro football. Third, the film explicitly critiques the role of sports media in constructing a mythology and spectacle of pro football that contributed to the cultural context in which the concussion crisis has emerged.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956651532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956651532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15405702.2015.1084628

DO - 10.1080/15405702.2015.1084628

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84956651532

VL - 14

SP - 49

EP - 57

JO - Popular Communication

JF - Popular Communication

SN - 1540-5702

IS - 1

ER -