Regionally Distinct Post-Socialist Leaders: Evidence from Leadership Trait Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Leaders are often noted to be instrumental in transitional political processes. Yet, most studies in the field bypass them, focusing instead on such factors as institutional setup, level of political culture, geopolitical location, diffusion of ideas and other factors. Even when highlighted, leaders are thought to be acting under the constraint of these arguably more defining factors and therefore relegated to a secondary role. Part of the problem is thought to be difficult to treat individuals as a measurable variable other than being shaped by aforementioned institutional-structural factors. Through a methodological borrowing this study determines that the leadership patterns across the region do vary in a substantial way. More importantly, the variation is determined independent of the overarching institutional-structural factors. The profiling of leadership patterns is followed by discussion of implications such exogenously determined leadership patterns may have on the study of transitional processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-150
Number of pages20
JournalSoviet and Post Soviet Review
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

leadership
leader
evidence
political culture
Socialist
Political Process
Political Culture
Borrowing
Profiling

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{db928dca7f8241929e3be97689b5d1d1,
title = "Regionally Distinct Post-Socialist Leaders: Evidence from Leadership Trait Analysis",
abstract = "Leaders are often noted to be instrumental in transitional political processes. Yet, most studies in the field bypass them, focusing instead on such factors as institutional setup, level of political culture, geopolitical location, diffusion of ideas and other factors. Even when highlighted, leaders are thought to be acting under the constraint of these arguably more defining factors and therefore relegated to a secondary role. Part of the problem is thought to be difficult to treat individuals as a measurable variable other than being shaped by aforementioned institutional-structural factors. Through a methodological borrowing this study determines that the leadership patterns across the region do vary in a substantial way. More importantly, the variation is determined independent of the overarching institutional-structural factors. The profiling of leadership patterns is followed by discussion of implications such exogenously determined leadership patterns may have on the study of transitional processes.",
author = "Azamat Sakiev",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/18763324-20171264",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "131--150",
journal = "Soviet and Post Soviet Review",
issn = "1075-1262",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "2",

}

Regionally Distinct Post-Socialist Leaders : Evidence from Leadership Trait Analysis. / Sakiev, Azamat.

In: Soviet and Post Soviet Review, Vol. 45, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 131-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regionally Distinct Post-Socialist Leaders

T2 - Evidence from Leadership Trait Analysis

AU - Sakiev, Azamat

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Leaders are often noted to be instrumental in transitional political processes. Yet, most studies in the field bypass them, focusing instead on such factors as institutional setup, level of political culture, geopolitical location, diffusion of ideas and other factors. Even when highlighted, leaders are thought to be acting under the constraint of these arguably more defining factors and therefore relegated to a secondary role. Part of the problem is thought to be difficult to treat individuals as a measurable variable other than being shaped by aforementioned institutional-structural factors. Through a methodological borrowing this study determines that the leadership patterns across the region do vary in a substantial way. More importantly, the variation is determined independent of the overarching institutional-structural factors. The profiling of leadership patterns is followed by discussion of implications such exogenously determined leadership patterns may have on the study of transitional processes.

AB - Leaders are often noted to be instrumental in transitional political processes. Yet, most studies in the field bypass them, focusing instead on such factors as institutional setup, level of political culture, geopolitical location, diffusion of ideas and other factors. Even when highlighted, leaders are thought to be acting under the constraint of these arguably more defining factors and therefore relegated to a secondary role. Part of the problem is thought to be difficult to treat individuals as a measurable variable other than being shaped by aforementioned institutional-structural factors. Through a methodological borrowing this study determines that the leadership patterns across the region do vary in a substantial way. More importantly, the variation is determined independent of the overarching institutional-structural factors. The profiling of leadership patterns is followed by discussion of implications such exogenously determined leadership patterns may have on the study of transitional processes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045568220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045568220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/18763324-20171264

DO - 10.1163/18763324-20171264

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045568220

VL - 45

SP - 131

EP - 150

JO - Soviet and Post Soviet Review

JF - Soviet and Post Soviet Review

SN - 1075-1262

IS - 2

ER -