A review of previous literature shows that there are at least three ways in which regulatory focus may be related to message framing. Specifically, persuasion might be enhanced when there is a match between a person's regulatory focus and (a) the outcome focus of the message (i.e., gain vs. loss anchor); (b) the overall valence of the message (i.e., positive vs. negative valence); and (c) the type of benefit or harm emphasized (i.e., achievement vs. security). In an effort to explicitly compare and contrast these three possibilities, and to determine whether the results depend on the way regulatory focus is measured, we used a 2 (outcome focus) by 2 (overall valence) by 2 (type of benefit or harm emphasized) within-subjects factorial design and three commonly employed measures of regulatory focus to test the three accounts. The findings were most consistent with the hypothesis that the perceived persuasiveness of a message is increased when there is a match between a person's chronic regulatory focus and the overall valence of the message.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||9|
|Journal||Motivation and Emotion|
|State||Published - Sep 28 2009|
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology