Relational maintenance, relational characteristics, and relational uncertainty in the faculty advisor-doctoral advisee relationship

Daniel H. Mansson, Scott A. Myers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which doctoral faculty advisors’ reports of their advisees’ use of relational maintenance behaviors are associated with the advisors’ perceived relational characteristics (i.e., liking, communication satisfaction, relational satisfaction, trust, and control mutuality) and relational uncertainty (i.e., behavioral, mutuality, definitional, and future uncertainty). Doctoral faculty advisors (N=141) completed a questionnaire in reference to their relationships with a specific doctoral student advisee. The results of canonical correlations largely supported the predictions in that the advisors’ reports of their advisees’ use of relational maintenance behaviors were associated positively with the five relational characteristics but associated negatively with the four types of relational uncertainty. These findings extend both extant relational maintenance and advisor-advisee research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)207-216
Number of pages10
JournalCommunication Research Reports
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Relational maintenance, relational characteristics, and relational uncertainty in the faculty advisor-doctoral advisee relationship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this