Relational messages, perceptions of hurt, and biological stress reactions to a disconfirming interaction

Jennifer S. Priem, Rachel M. McLaren, Denise Haunani Solomon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines relational messages as predictors of hurt, using both self-report indicators of hurt and biological markers of stress reactivity to a hurtful interaction. Hypotheses predict that perceptions of involvement, composure, and receptivity increase feelings of hurt, whereas perceptions of similarity, affiliation, and informality decrease hurt. Participants (N = 91) engage in two 5-minute conversations with a romantic partner about core traits and values. The partner is coached to be disconfirming and hurtful during the second conversation about the participant's core traits or values. Following the interaction, participants report their level of hurt and their perceptions of the conversation and give saliva samples to measure cortisol. The hypotheses are partially supported, such that perceptions of affiliation and informality are negatively associated with hurt feelings. Furthermore, self-reported hurt feelings are positively associated with increases in salivary cortisol. Affiliation and receptivity also have direct effects on the stability of cortisol change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)48-72
Number of pages25
JournalCommunication Research
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2010

Fingerprint

Cortisol
conversation
interaction
Values
Interaction
Receptivity
Informality

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{4a5b2caa97574ce988376efbf94d7449,
title = "Relational messages, perceptions of hurt, and biological stress reactions to a disconfirming interaction",
abstract = "This study examines relational messages as predictors of hurt, using both self-report indicators of hurt and biological markers of stress reactivity to a hurtful interaction. Hypotheses predict that perceptions of involvement, composure, and receptivity increase feelings of hurt, whereas perceptions of similarity, affiliation, and informality decrease hurt. Participants (N = 91) engage in two 5-minute conversations with a romantic partner about core traits and values. The partner is coached to be disconfirming and hurtful during the second conversation about the participant's core traits or values. Following the interaction, participants report their level of hurt and their perceptions of the conversation and give saliva samples to measure cortisol. The hypotheses are partially supported, such that perceptions of affiliation and informality are negatively associated with hurt feelings. Furthermore, self-reported hurt feelings are positively associated with increases in salivary cortisol. Affiliation and receptivity also have direct effects on the stability of cortisol change.",
author = "Priem, {Jennifer S.} and McLaren, {Rachel M.} and Solomon, {Denise Haunani}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0093650209351470",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "48--72",
journal = "Communication Research",
issn = "0093-6502",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Relational messages, perceptions of hurt, and biological stress reactions to a disconfirming interaction. / Priem, Jennifer S.; McLaren, Rachel M.; Solomon, Denise Haunani.

In: Communication Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.02.2010, p. 48-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relational messages, perceptions of hurt, and biological stress reactions to a disconfirming interaction

AU - Priem, Jennifer S.

AU - McLaren, Rachel M.

AU - Solomon, Denise Haunani

PY - 2010/2/1

Y1 - 2010/2/1

N2 - This study examines relational messages as predictors of hurt, using both self-report indicators of hurt and biological markers of stress reactivity to a hurtful interaction. Hypotheses predict that perceptions of involvement, composure, and receptivity increase feelings of hurt, whereas perceptions of similarity, affiliation, and informality decrease hurt. Participants (N = 91) engage in two 5-minute conversations with a romantic partner about core traits and values. The partner is coached to be disconfirming and hurtful during the second conversation about the participant's core traits or values. Following the interaction, participants report their level of hurt and their perceptions of the conversation and give saliva samples to measure cortisol. The hypotheses are partially supported, such that perceptions of affiliation and informality are negatively associated with hurt feelings. Furthermore, self-reported hurt feelings are positively associated with increases in salivary cortisol. Affiliation and receptivity also have direct effects on the stability of cortisol change.

AB - This study examines relational messages as predictors of hurt, using both self-report indicators of hurt and biological markers of stress reactivity to a hurtful interaction. Hypotheses predict that perceptions of involvement, composure, and receptivity increase feelings of hurt, whereas perceptions of similarity, affiliation, and informality decrease hurt. Participants (N = 91) engage in two 5-minute conversations with a romantic partner about core traits and values. The partner is coached to be disconfirming and hurtful during the second conversation about the participant's core traits or values. Following the interaction, participants report their level of hurt and their perceptions of the conversation and give saliva samples to measure cortisol. The hypotheses are partially supported, such that perceptions of affiliation and informality are negatively associated with hurt feelings. Furthermore, self-reported hurt feelings are positively associated with increases in salivary cortisol. Affiliation and receptivity also have direct effects on the stability of cortisol change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75649130052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75649130052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0093650209351470

DO - 10.1177/0093650209351470

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:75649130052

VL - 37

SP - 48

EP - 72

JO - Communication Research

JF - Communication Research

SN - 0093-6502

IS - 1

ER -