Relative deer density and sustainability: A conceptual framework for integrating deer management with ecosystem management

David S. DeCalesta, Susan L Stout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Controversy surrounding the management of white-tailed deer populations in the United States has grown nearly as rapidly as deer populations themselves. Management paradigms based on the jumble of ecological and political definitions of carrying capacity have failed to resolve these conflicts, while obscuring important relationships among ecosystem elements. Sustaining the forests on which deer depend requires a new conceptual framework for management. We propose managing deer for substainability of ecosystems, using RDD, or relative deer density (deer density as a percent of K), as the framework. This framework replaces the variety of old carrying capacity concepts: sustained yield of maximum numbers of deer for harvest and sustained yield of timber. All of these can be expressed in the common currency of RDD, which would help clarify apparent differences when data are collected on landscapes with differing carrying capacities. Instead of a management target based on an often value-and-conflict-ridden assessment of deer impacts and deer population dynamics, the RDD framwork focuses attention on the interactions of deer and other ecosystem elements. Stakeholders can focus on what information is needed to define relationships locally and plan management to sustain critical elements - for wildlife habitat conservation, plant community conservation, or the conservation of deer habitat over the long term. However, these concepts offer no panacea for conflict-weary managers because they demonstrate clearly that RDD s is <1/3 the RDD associated with maximum sustained yield of deer for hunter harvest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)252-258
Number of pages7
JournalWildlife Society Bulletin
Volume25
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1 1997

Fingerprint

ecosystem management
conceptual framework
deer
sustainability
carrying capacity
ecosystems
ecosystem
conservation plants
habitat conservation
wildlife habitats
Odocoileus virginianus
currency
stakeholders
nature conservation
plant communities
managers
timber
population dynamics
plant community
stakeholder

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

@article{420f63180f7946c3b013a4eec9fb5b17,
title = "Relative deer density and sustainability: A conceptual framework for integrating deer management with ecosystem management",
abstract = "Controversy surrounding the management of white-tailed deer populations in the United States has grown nearly as rapidly as deer populations themselves. Management paradigms based on the jumble of ecological and political definitions of carrying capacity have failed to resolve these conflicts, while obscuring important relationships among ecosystem elements. Sustaining the forests on which deer depend requires a new conceptual framework for management. We propose managing deer for substainability of ecosystems, using RDD, or relative deer density (deer density as a percent of K), as the framework. This framework replaces the variety of old carrying capacity concepts: sustained yield of maximum numbers of deer for harvest and sustained yield of timber. All of these can be expressed in the common currency of RDD, which would help clarify apparent differences when data are collected on landscapes with differing carrying capacities. Instead of a management target based on an often value-and-conflict-ridden assessment of deer impacts and deer population dynamics, the RDD framwork focuses attention on the interactions of deer and other ecosystem elements. Stakeholders can focus on what information is needed to define relationships locally and plan management to sustain critical elements - for wildlife habitat conservation, plant community conservation, or the conservation of deer habitat over the long term. However, these concepts offer no panacea for conflict-weary managers because they demonstrate clearly that RDD s is <1/3 the RDD associated with maximum sustained yield of deer for hunter harvest.",
author = "DeCalesta, {David S.} and Stout, {Susan L}",
year = "1997",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "252--258",
journal = "Wildlife Society Bulletin",
issn = "0091-7648",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Relative deer density and sustainability : A conceptual framework for integrating deer management with ecosystem management. / DeCalesta, David S.; Stout, Susan L.

In: Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.06.1997, p. 252-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relative deer density and sustainability

T2 - A conceptual framework for integrating deer management with ecosystem management

AU - DeCalesta, David S.

AU - Stout, Susan L

PY - 1997/6/1

Y1 - 1997/6/1

N2 - Controversy surrounding the management of white-tailed deer populations in the United States has grown nearly as rapidly as deer populations themselves. Management paradigms based on the jumble of ecological and political definitions of carrying capacity have failed to resolve these conflicts, while obscuring important relationships among ecosystem elements. Sustaining the forests on which deer depend requires a new conceptual framework for management. We propose managing deer for substainability of ecosystems, using RDD, or relative deer density (deer density as a percent of K), as the framework. This framework replaces the variety of old carrying capacity concepts: sustained yield of maximum numbers of deer for harvest and sustained yield of timber. All of these can be expressed in the common currency of RDD, which would help clarify apparent differences when data are collected on landscapes with differing carrying capacities. Instead of a management target based on an often value-and-conflict-ridden assessment of deer impacts and deer population dynamics, the RDD framwork focuses attention on the interactions of deer and other ecosystem elements. Stakeholders can focus on what information is needed to define relationships locally and plan management to sustain critical elements - for wildlife habitat conservation, plant community conservation, or the conservation of deer habitat over the long term. However, these concepts offer no panacea for conflict-weary managers because they demonstrate clearly that RDD s is <1/3 the RDD associated with maximum sustained yield of deer for hunter harvest.

AB - Controversy surrounding the management of white-tailed deer populations in the United States has grown nearly as rapidly as deer populations themselves. Management paradigms based on the jumble of ecological and political definitions of carrying capacity have failed to resolve these conflicts, while obscuring important relationships among ecosystem elements. Sustaining the forests on which deer depend requires a new conceptual framework for management. We propose managing deer for substainability of ecosystems, using RDD, or relative deer density (deer density as a percent of K), as the framework. This framework replaces the variety of old carrying capacity concepts: sustained yield of maximum numbers of deer for harvest and sustained yield of timber. All of these can be expressed in the common currency of RDD, which would help clarify apparent differences when data are collected on landscapes with differing carrying capacities. Instead of a management target based on an often value-and-conflict-ridden assessment of deer impacts and deer population dynamics, the RDD framwork focuses attention on the interactions of deer and other ecosystem elements. Stakeholders can focus on what information is needed to define relationships locally and plan management to sustain critical elements - for wildlife habitat conservation, plant community conservation, or the conservation of deer habitat over the long term. However, these concepts offer no panacea for conflict-weary managers because they demonstrate clearly that RDD s is <1/3 the RDD associated with maximum sustained yield of deer for hunter harvest.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030776281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030776281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030776281

VL - 25

SP - 252

EP - 258

JO - Wildlife Society Bulletin

JF - Wildlife Society Bulletin

SN - 0091-7648

IS - 2

ER -