Relevant outcomes in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome studies

Nadir Yehya, Neal J. Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite distinct epidemiology and outcomes, pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is often managed based on evidence extrapolated from treatment of adults. The impact of non-pulmonary processes on mortality as well as the lower mortality rate compared to adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) renders the utilization of short-term mortality as a primary outcome measure for interventional studies problematic. However, data regarding alternatives to mortality are profoundly understudied, and proposed alternatives, such as ventilator-free days, may be themselves subject to hidden biases. Given the neuropsychiatric and functional impairment in adult survivors of ARDS, characterization of these morbidities in children with PARDS is of paramount importance. The purpose of this review is to frame these challenges in the context of the existing pediatric literature, and using adult ARDS as a guide, suggest potential clinically relevant outcomes that deserve further investigation. The goal is to identify important areas of study in order to better define clinical practice and facilitate future interventional trials in PARDS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number51
JournalFrontiers in Pediatrics
Volume4
Issue numberMAY
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Pediatrics
Mortality
Mechanical Ventilators
Survivors
Epidemiology
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Morbidity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

@article{d697e1fca8af4457bd5f459e11bf1ec9,
title = "Relevant outcomes in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome studies",
abstract = "Despite distinct epidemiology and outcomes, pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is often managed based on evidence extrapolated from treatment of adults. The impact of non-pulmonary processes on mortality as well as the lower mortality rate compared to adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) renders the utilization of short-term mortality as a primary outcome measure for interventional studies problematic. However, data regarding alternatives to mortality are profoundly understudied, and proposed alternatives, such as ventilator-free days, may be themselves subject to hidden biases. Given the neuropsychiatric and functional impairment in adult survivors of ARDS, characterization of these morbidities in children with PARDS is of paramount importance. The purpose of this review is to frame these challenges in the context of the existing pediatric literature, and using adult ARDS as a guide, suggest potential clinically relevant outcomes that deserve further investigation. The goal is to identify important areas of study in order to better define clinical practice and facilitate future interventional trials in PARDS.",
author = "Nadir Yehya and Thomas, {Neal J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fped.2016.00051",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Frontiers in Pediatrics",
issn = "2296-2360",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "MAY",

}

Relevant outcomes in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome studies. / Yehya, Nadir; Thomas, Neal J.

In: Frontiers in Pediatrics, Vol. 4, No. MAY, 51, 01.05.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relevant outcomes in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome studies

AU - Yehya, Nadir

AU - Thomas, Neal J.

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Despite distinct epidemiology and outcomes, pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is often managed based on evidence extrapolated from treatment of adults. The impact of non-pulmonary processes on mortality as well as the lower mortality rate compared to adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) renders the utilization of short-term mortality as a primary outcome measure for interventional studies problematic. However, data regarding alternatives to mortality are profoundly understudied, and proposed alternatives, such as ventilator-free days, may be themselves subject to hidden biases. Given the neuropsychiatric and functional impairment in adult survivors of ARDS, characterization of these morbidities in children with PARDS is of paramount importance. The purpose of this review is to frame these challenges in the context of the existing pediatric literature, and using adult ARDS as a guide, suggest potential clinically relevant outcomes that deserve further investigation. The goal is to identify important areas of study in order to better define clinical practice and facilitate future interventional trials in PARDS.

AB - Despite distinct epidemiology and outcomes, pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is often managed based on evidence extrapolated from treatment of adults. The impact of non-pulmonary processes on mortality as well as the lower mortality rate compared to adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) renders the utilization of short-term mortality as a primary outcome measure for interventional studies problematic. However, data regarding alternatives to mortality are profoundly understudied, and proposed alternatives, such as ventilator-free days, may be themselves subject to hidden biases. Given the neuropsychiatric and functional impairment in adult survivors of ARDS, characterization of these morbidities in children with PARDS is of paramount importance. The purpose of this review is to frame these challenges in the context of the existing pediatric literature, and using adult ARDS as a guide, suggest potential clinically relevant outcomes that deserve further investigation. The goal is to identify important areas of study in order to better define clinical practice and facilitate future interventional trials in PARDS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020525951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020525951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fped.2016.00051

DO - 10.3389/fped.2016.00051

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85020525951

VL - 4

JO - Frontiers in Pediatrics

JF - Frontiers in Pediatrics

SN - 2296-2360

IS - MAY

M1 - 51

ER -