Religious attributions of responsibility

A review of empirical literature and development of an instrument

Justin Bailey, Jeffrey Hayes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A critical review of the religious attribution literature is presented. Two overriding critiques are that the field lacks adequate instruments to measure religious attributions, and that attributions related to problem cause are confused with attributions about problem solution. Consequently, an instrument was developed to measure religious attributions of responsibility for problem cause and solution. An exploratory, principal-axis factor analysis conducted on data generated by 457 university students revealed the theorized factors of cause and solution. High internal consistency and test-retest reliability were obtained. A subsequent confirmatory factor analysis on a separate sample of 179 students provided evidence of construct validity for the instrument. Research questions are presented that would advance current understanding of religious attributions, and limitations of the instrument are noted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-62
Number of pages14
JournalCounseling and Values
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Students
Reproducibility of Results
Research
Religion
Attribution
Responsibility
Causes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Religious studies

Cite this

@article{90614eb55eee48388af8fcea81c95e14,
title = "Religious attributions of responsibility: A review of empirical literature and development of an instrument",
abstract = "A critical review of the religious attribution literature is presented. Two overriding critiques are that the field lacks adequate instruments to measure religious attributions, and that attributions related to problem cause are confused with attributions about problem solution. Consequently, an instrument was developed to measure religious attributions of responsibility for problem cause and solution. An exploratory, principal-axis factor analysis conducted on data generated by 457 university students revealed the theorized factors of cause and solution. High internal consistency and test-retest reliability were obtained. A subsequent confirmatory factor analysis on a separate sample of 179 students provided evidence of construct validity for the instrument. Research questions are presented that would advance current understanding of religious attributions, and limitations of the instrument are noted.",
author = "Justin Bailey and Jeffrey Hayes",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/j.2161-007X.1998.tb00960.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "49--62",
journal = "Counseling and Values",
issn = "0160-7960",
publisher = "American Counseling Association",
number = "1",

}

Religious attributions of responsibility : A review of empirical literature and development of an instrument. / Bailey, Justin; Hayes, Jeffrey.

In: Counseling and Values, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.01.1998, p. 49-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Religious attributions of responsibility

T2 - A review of empirical literature and development of an instrument

AU - Bailey, Justin

AU - Hayes, Jeffrey

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - A critical review of the religious attribution literature is presented. Two overriding critiques are that the field lacks adequate instruments to measure religious attributions, and that attributions related to problem cause are confused with attributions about problem solution. Consequently, an instrument was developed to measure religious attributions of responsibility for problem cause and solution. An exploratory, principal-axis factor analysis conducted on data generated by 457 university students revealed the theorized factors of cause and solution. High internal consistency and test-retest reliability were obtained. A subsequent confirmatory factor analysis on a separate sample of 179 students provided evidence of construct validity for the instrument. Research questions are presented that would advance current understanding of religious attributions, and limitations of the instrument are noted.

AB - A critical review of the religious attribution literature is presented. Two overriding critiques are that the field lacks adequate instruments to measure religious attributions, and that attributions related to problem cause are confused with attributions about problem solution. Consequently, an instrument was developed to measure religious attributions of responsibility for problem cause and solution. An exploratory, principal-axis factor analysis conducted on data generated by 457 university students revealed the theorized factors of cause and solution. High internal consistency and test-retest reliability were obtained. A subsequent confirmatory factor analysis on a separate sample of 179 students provided evidence of construct validity for the instrument. Research questions are presented that would advance current understanding of religious attributions, and limitations of the instrument are noted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038919937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038919937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/j.2161-007X.1998.tb00960.x

DO - 10.1002/j.2161-007X.1998.tb00960.x

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 49

EP - 62

JO - Counseling and Values

JF - Counseling and Values

SN - 0160-7960

IS - 1

ER -