Religious regulation and the courts: The judiciary's changing role in protecting minority religions from majoritarian rule

John Wybraniec, Roger Finke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Following the 1990 Smith v. Employment Division of Oregon ruling on the limits of religious freedom, many protested that the Supreme Court had opened the door for majoritarian oppression of minority rights. Using data collected on 2,109 court cases on religion from 1981-1996 we document recent trends in court decisions on religion and address questions posed by supply-side theory, legal scholars, and the sociology of law. We find that religious sects and cults were more likely to be involved in court cases and more likely to receive unfavorable rulings. Multivariate models confirm these finding and support the charges of legal scholars that the Smith decision has decreased the rate of rulings favoring religious groups. Finally, we find that the Smith decision had both a period effect and a case precedent effect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)427-444
Number of pages18
JournalJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2001

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Religious studies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Religious regulation and the courts: The judiciary's changing role in protecting minority religions from majoritarian rule'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this