Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture with suture anchors

Scott Lynch, David M. Beard, Per A.F.H. Renström

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated six cases of distal biceps tendon rupture that were treated by a two-incision operative repair using suture anchor attachment to the radial tuberosity for clinical outcome and strength testing. All patients had repair performed by the same surgeon. The average age of the patients, all male, was 43 years (range, 32-57 years). Average time from injury to operative repair was 22 days (range, 9-54 days). Follow-up time averaged 24 months after definitive treatment (range, 11-46 months). At follow-up no patient had limitation of activity and all patients were able to return to their previous employment, although three noted some minor antecubital fossa discomfort. No patient developed a synostosis. Cybex (Medway, Mass.) isokinetic testing revealed elbow flexion strength return for peak torque, total work, and average power, of 107%, 103%, and 110% of the uninjured arm, respectively. Elbow flexion endurance was 2% less in the injured arm. Forearm supination strength measured by peak torque, total work, and average power, was 97%, 85%, and 88% of the uninjured arm, respectively. Forearm supination endurance was 10% less in the injured arm. Our results using suture anchor repair are similar to those previously reported in the literature from bone tunnel repair. Based on our data, we believe that a two-incision repair with suture anchor attachment is a safe and effective method for treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-131
Number of pages7
JournalKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume7
Issue number3
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999

Fingerprint

Suture Anchors
Tendons
Rupture
Arm
Supination
Torque
Elbow
Forearm
Synostosis
Radius
Bone and Bones
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Lynch, Scott ; Beard, David M. ; Renström, Per A.F.H. / Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture with suture anchors. In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 1999 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 125-131.
@article{20559cbdc4314b6cab86682e552d36e1,
title = "Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture with suture anchors",
abstract = "We retrospectively evaluated six cases of distal biceps tendon rupture that were treated by a two-incision operative repair using suture anchor attachment to the radial tuberosity for clinical outcome and strength testing. All patients had repair performed by the same surgeon. The average age of the patients, all male, was 43 years (range, 32-57 years). Average time from injury to operative repair was 22 days (range, 9-54 days). Follow-up time averaged 24 months after definitive treatment (range, 11-46 months). At follow-up no patient had limitation of activity and all patients were able to return to their previous employment, although three noted some minor antecubital fossa discomfort. No patient developed a synostosis. Cybex (Medway, Mass.) isokinetic testing revealed elbow flexion strength return for peak torque, total work, and average power, of 107{\%}, 103{\%}, and 110{\%} of the uninjured arm, respectively. Elbow flexion endurance was 2{\%} less in the injured arm. Forearm supination strength measured by peak torque, total work, and average power, was 97{\%}, 85{\%}, and 88{\%} of the uninjured arm, respectively. Forearm supination endurance was 10{\%} less in the injured arm. Our results using suture anchor repair are similar to those previously reported in the literature from bone tunnel repair. Based on our data, we believe that a two-incision repair with suture anchor attachment is a safe and effective method for treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures.",
author = "Scott Lynch and Beard, {David M.} and Renstr{\"o}m, {Per A.F.H.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "125--131",
journal = "Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy",
issn = "0942-2056",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture with suture anchors. / Lynch, Scott; Beard, David M.; Renström, Per A.F.H.

In: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.12.1999, p. 125-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repair of distal biceps tendon rupture with suture anchors

AU - Lynch, Scott

AU - Beard, David M.

AU - Renström, Per A.F.H.

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - We retrospectively evaluated six cases of distal biceps tendon rupture that were treated by a two-incision operative repair using suture anchor attachment to the radial tuberosity for clinical outcome and strength testing. All patients had repair performed by the same surgeon. The average age of the patients, all male, was 43 years (range, 32-57 years). Average time from injury to operative repair was 22 days (range, 9-54 days). Follow-up time averaged 24 months after definitive treatment (range, 11-46 months). At follow-up no patient had limitation of activity and all patients were able to return to their previous employment, although three noted some minor antecubital fossa discomfort. No patient developed a synostosis. Cybex (Medway, Mass.) isokinetic testing revealed elbow flexion strength return for peak torque, total work, and average power, of 107%, 103%, and 110% of the uninjured arm, respectively. Elbow flexion endurance was 2% less in the injured arm. Forearm supination strength measured by peak torque, total work, and average power, was 97%, 85%, and 88% of the uninjured arm, respectively. Forearm supination endurance was 10% less in the injured arm. Our results using suture anchor repair are similar to those previously reported in the literature from bone tunnel repair. Based on our data, we believe that a two-incision repair with suture anchor attachment is a safe and effective method for treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures.

AB - We retrospectively evaluated six cases of distal biceps tendon rupture that were treated by a two-incision operative repair using suture anchor attachment to the radial tuberosity for clinical outcome and strength testing. All patients had repair performed by the same surgeon. The average age of the patients, all male, was 43 years (range, 32-57 years). Average time from injury to operative repair was 22 days (range, 9-54 days). Follow-up time averaged 24 months after definitive treatment (range, 11-46 months). At follow-up no patient had limitation of activity and all patients were able to return to their previous employment, although three noted some minor antecubital fossa discomfort. No patient developed a synostosis. Cybex (Medway, Mass.) isokinetic testing revealed elbow flexion strength return for peak torque, total work, and average power, of 107%, 103%, and 110% of the uninjured arm, respectively. Elbow flexion endurance was 2% less in the injured arm. Forearm supination strength measured by peak torque, total work, and average power, was 97%, 85%, and 88% of the uninjured arm, respectively. Forearm supination endurance was 10% less in the injured arm. Our results using suture anchor repair are similar to those previously reported in the literature from bone tunnel repair. Based on our data, we believe that a two-incision repair with suture anchor attachment is a safe and effective method for treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032610032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032610032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10223536

AN - SCOPUS:0032610032

VL - 7

SP - 125

EP - 131

JO - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

JF - Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

SN - 0942-2056

IS - 3

ER -