Reparations, Responsibility, and Formalism: A Reply to Carnes

Raff Donelson

doi:10.1007/s11406-020-00237-y

Reparations, Responsibility, and Formalism: A Reply to Carnes

Raff Donelson

Dickinson Law (Carlisle)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In a recent paper, Thomas Carnes develops a novel argument for reparations for historical injustices. This Reply shows that Carnes succeeds only at the cost of invoking an implausible formalism. The Reply also presents in brief a simpler argument for reparations.

Original language	English (US)
Journal	Philosophia (United States)
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00237-y
State	Accepted/In press - 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Philosophy

Access to Document

10.1007/s11406-020-00237-y

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reparations, Responsibility, and Formalism: A Reply to Carnes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{3b061f747cfc49e9a724ebbfef68f665,

title = "Reparations, Responsibility, and Formalism: A Reply to Carnes",

abstract = "In a recent paper, Thomas Carnes develops a novel argument for reparations for historical injustices. This Reply shows that Carnes succeeds only at the cost of invoking an implausible formalism. The Reply also presents in brief a simpler argument for reparations.",

author = "Raff Donelson",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1007/s11406-020-00237-y",

language = "English (US)",

journal = "Philosophia",

issn = "0048-3893",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reparations, Responsibility, and Formalism

T2 - A Reply to Carnes

AU - Donelson, Raff

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - In a recent paper, Thomas Carnes develops a novel argument for reparations for historical injustices. This Reply shows that Carnes succeeds only at the cost of invoking an implausible formalism. The Reply also presents in brief a simpler argument for reparations.

AB - In a recent paper, Thomas Carnes develops a novel argument for reparations for historical injustices. This Reply shows that Carnes succeeds only at the cost of invoking an implausible formalism. The Reply also presents in brief a simpler argument for reparations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087288290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087288290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11406-020-00237-y

DO - 10.1007/s11406-020-00237-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85087288290

JO - Philosophia

JF - Philosophia

SN - 0048-3893

ER -