Reparations, Responsibility, and Formalism: A Reply to Carnes

Raff Donelson

doi:10.1007/s11406-020-00237-y

Reparations, Responsibility, and Formalism: A Reply to Carnes

Raff Donelson

Dickinson Law (Carlisle)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In a recent paper, Thomas Carnes develops a novel argument for reparations for historical injustices. This Reply shows that Carnes succeeds only at the cost of invoking an implausible formalism. The Reply also presents in brief a simpler argument for reparations.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	643-649
Number of pages	7
Journal	Philosophia (United States)
Volume	49
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00237-y
State	Published - Apr 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Philosophy

Access to Document

10.1007/s11406-020-00237-y

Cite this

@article{3b061f747cfc49e9a724ebbfef68f665,

title = "Reparations, Responsibility, and Formalism: A Reply to Carnes",

abstract = "In a recent paper, Thomas Carnes develops a novel argument for reparations for historical injustices. This Reply shows that Carnes succeeds only at the cost of invoking an implausible formalism. The Reply also presents in brief a simpler argument for reparations.",

author = "Raff Donelson",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, Springer Nature B.V.",

year = "2021",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1007/s11406-020-00237-y",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "49",

pages = "643--649",

journal = "Philosophia",

issn = "0048-3893",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reparations, Responsibility, and Formalism

T2 - A Reply to Carnes

AU - Donelson, Raff

PY - 2021/4

Y1 - 2021/4

N2 - In a recent paper, Thomas Carnes develops a novel argument for reparations for historical injustices. This Reply shows that Carnes succeeds only at the cost of invoking an implausible formalism. The Reply also presents in brief a simpler argument for reparations.

AB - In a recent paper, Thomas Carnes develops a novel argument for reparations for historical injustices. This Reply shows that Carnes succeeds only at the cost of invoking an implausible formalism. The Reply also presents in brief a simpler argument for reparations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087288290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087288290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11406-020-00237-y

DO - 10.1007/s11406-020-00237-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85087288290

VL - 49

SP - 643

EP - 649

JO - Philosophia

JF - Philosophia

SN - 0048-3893

IS - 2

ER -

Reparations, Responsibility, and Formalism: A Reply to Carnes

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this