Abstract
In a recent paper, Thomas Carnes develops a novel argument for reparations for historical injustices. This Reply shows that Carnes succeeds only at the cost of invoking an implausible formalism. The Reply also presents in brief a simpler argument for reparations.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Journal | Philosophia (United States) |
DOIs | |
State | Accepted/In press - 2020 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy