Repeatability of spatial measures using figure-of-eight microphones

Michelle Celine Vigeant, Clothilde B. Giacomoni, Amy C. Scherma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the measurement deviations of the spatial measures lateral energy fraction (LF) and late lateral energy level (GLL), obtained using figure-of-eight microphones. The following factors that may contribute to measurement deviations were evaluated: (1) microphone orientation, (2) spacing between figure-of-eight and omni-directional microphones, which varied from 64 to 152 mm, and (3) differences between individual microphones. Impulse response measurements were taken in a 100-seat lecture hall at four receiver positions using a total of eight figure-of-eight microphones. The average differences due to microphone orientation and spacing, were found to be relatively small: 0.20 ± 0.18 dB (4.3 ± 3.8%) for GLL and 0.02 ± 0.02 (2.0 ± 2.4 JNDs) for LF. (The just noticeable difference (JND) of LF has been established at 5%, however the GLL JND has not yet been established.) The largest differences were found when comparing the results between the individual microphones with differences on the order of 0.92 ± 0.73 dB (16 ± 13%) for GLL and 0.022 ± 0.018 (2.6 ± 1.9 JNDs) for LF. These larger differences are likely due to the variations in microphone sensitivity. Based on the measurement conditions used in this case study, it is possible to compare GLL and LF measurements with a given figure-8 microphone in order to evaluate relative differences, since the measurement deviations for a given microphone were found to be relatively low. However, it is difficult to compare the results of data obtained using different figure-8 microphones due to the measurement deviations of the microphones.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1076-1084
Number of pages9
JournalApplied Acoustics
Volume74
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - May 6 2013

Fingerprint

microphones
deviation
spacing
energy
lectures
seats
impulses
receivers
energy levels

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Vigeant, Michelle Celine ; Giacomoni, Clothilde B. ; Scherma, Amy C. / Repeatability of spatial measures using figure-of-eight microphones. In: Applied Acoustics. 2013 ; Vol. 74, No. 9. pp. 1076-1084.
@article{1b176ec0689247cc92cdbb7ff47c17c8,
title = "Repeatability of spatial measures using figure-of-eight microphones",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the measurement deviations of the spatial measures lateral energy fraction (LF) and late lateral energy level (GLL), obtained using figure-of-eight microphones. The following factors that may contribute to measurement deviations were evaluated: (1) microphone orientation, (2) spacing between figure-of-eight and omni-directional microphones, which varied from 64 to 152 mm, and (3) differences between individual microphones. Impulse response measurements were taken in a 100-seat lecture hall at four receiver positions using a total of eight figure-of-eight microphones. The average differences due to microphone orientation and spacing, were found to be relatively small: 0.20 ± 0.18 dB (4.3 ± 3.8{\%}) for GLL and 0.02 ± 0.02 (2.0 ± 2.4 JNDs) for LF. (The just noticeable difference (JND) of LF has been established at 5{\%}, however the GLL JND has not yet been established.) The largest differences were found when comparing the results between the individual microphones with differences on the order of 0.92 ± 0.73 dB (16 ± 13{\%}) for GLL and 0.022 ± 0.018 (2.6 ± 1.9 JNDs) for LF. These larger differences are likely due to the variations in microphone sensitivity. Based on the measurement conditions used in this case study, it is possible to compare GLL and LF measurements with a given figure-8 microphone in order to evaluate relative differences, since the measurement deviations for a given microphone were found to be relatively low. However, it is difficult to compare the results of data obtained using different figure-8 microphones due to the measurement deviations of the microphones.",
author = "Vigeant, {Michelle Celine} and Giacomoni, {Clothilde B.} and Scherma, {Amy C.}",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.02.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "1076--1084",
journal = "Applied Acoustics",
issn = "0003-682X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "9",

}

Repeatability of spatial measures using figure-of-eight microphones. / Vigeant, Michelle Celine; Giacomoni, Clothilde B.; Scherma, Amy C.

In: Applied Acoustics, Vol. 74, No. 9, 06.05.2013, p. 1076-1084.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeatability of spatial measures using figure-of-eight microphones

AU - Vigeant, Michelle Celine

AU - Giacomoni, Clothilde B.

AU - Scherma, Amy C.

PY - 2013/5/6

Y1 - 2013/5/6

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the measurement deviations of the spatial measures lateral energy fraction (LF) and late lateral energy level (GLL), obtained using figure-of-eight microphones. The following factors that may contribute to measurement deviations were evaluated: (1) microphone orientation, (2) spacing between figure-of-eight and omni-directional microphones, which varied from 64 to 152 mm, and (3) differences between individual microphones. Impulse response measurements were taken in a 100-seat lecture hall at four receiver positions using a total of eight figure-of-eight microphones. The average differences due to microphone orientation and spacing, were found to be relatively small: 0.20 ± 0.18 dB (4.3 ± 3.8%) for GLL and 0.02 ± 0.02 (2.0 ± 2.4 JNDs) for LF. (The just noticeable difference (JND) of LF has been established at 5%, however the GLL JND has not yet been established.) The largest differences were found when comparing the results between the individual microphones with differences on the order of 0.92 ± 0.73 dB (16 ± 13%) for GLL and 0.022 ± 0.018 (2.6 ± 1.9 JNDs) for LF. These larger differences are likely due to the variations in microphone sensitivity. Based on the measurement conditions used in this case study, it is possible to compare GLL and LF measurements with a given figure-8 microphone in order to evaluate relative differences, since the measurement deviations for a given microphone were found to be relatively low. However, it is difficult to compare the results of data obtained using different figure-8 microphones due to the measurement deviations of the microphones.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the measurement deviations of the spatial measures lateral energy fraction (LF) and late lateral energy level (GLL), obtained using figure-of-eight microphones. The following factors that may contribute to measurement deviations were evaluated: (1) microphone orientation, (2) spacing between figure-of-eight and omni-directional microphones, which varied from 64 to 152 mm, and (3) differences between individual microphones. Impulse response measurements were taken in a 100-seat lecture hall at four receiver positions using a total of eight figure-of-eight microphones. The average differences due to microphone orientation and spacing, were found to be relatively small: 0.20 ± 0.18 dB (4.3 ± 3.8%) for GLL and 0.02 ± 0.02 (2.0 ± 2.4 JNDs) for LF. (The just noticeable difference (JND) of LF has been established at 5%, however the GLL JND has not yet been established.) The largest differences were found when comparing the results between the individual microphones with differences on the order of 0.92 ± 0.73 dB (16 ± 13%) for GLL and 0.022 ± 0.018 (2.6 ± 1.9 JNDs) for LF. These larger differences are likely due to the variations in microphone sensitivity. Based on the measurement conditions used in this case study, it is possible to compare GLL and LF measurements with a given figure-8 microphone in order to evaluate relative differences, since the measurement deviations for a given microphone were found to be relatively low. However, it is difficult to compare the results of data obtained using different figure-8 microphones due to the measurement deviations of the microphones.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876924157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876924157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.02.002

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 1076

EP - 1084

JO - Applied Acoustics

JF - Applied Acoustics

SN - 0003-682X

IS - 9

ER -