Replication data sets and favored-hypothesis bias: Comment on Jeremy Freese (2007) and Gary King (2007)

Glenn A. Firebaugh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Jeremy Freese makes the case for data sharing as a condition of publication for quantitative research in sociology, and Gary King tells us of a Dataverse Network under construction that is designed to routinize the process of posting and storing such data sets. No matter how user-friendly that network turns out to be, it is clear that no system is entirely cost-free, either for researchers or for journal editors. It is important, then, to determine whether the benefits of mandatory data sharing (or ''data relinquishment,'' as Herrnson calls it) would outweigh the costs. In this comment, the author discusses the issue from his vantage point as a former editor and concludes that the benefits of such a requirement most likely would exceed the costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)200-209
Number of pages10
JournalSociological Methods and Research
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Replication data sets and favored-hypothesis bias: Comment on Jeremy Freese (2007) and Gary King (2007)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this