Representing users in accessibility research

Andrew L. Sears, Vicki L. Hanson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The need to study representative users is widely accepted within the human-computer interaction (HCI) community. While exceptions exist, and alternative populations are sometimes studied, virtually any introduction to the process of designing user interfaces will discuss the importance of understanding the intended users as well as the significant impact individual differences can have on how effectively individuals can use various technologies. HCI researchers are expected to provide relevant demographics regarding study participants as well as information about experience using similar technologies. Yet in the field of accessibility, we continue to see studies that do not appropriately include representative users. Highlighting ways to remedy this multifaceted problem, we argue that expectations regarding how accessibility research is conducted and reported must be raised if this field is to have the desired impact with regard to inclusive design, the information technologies studied, and the lives of the individuals studied.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7
JournalACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Human computer interaction
User interfaces
Information technology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Cite this

@article{1b642bca825d4f6bbbbc0f52bcb8e716,
title = "Representing users in accessibility research",
abstract = "The need to study representative users is widely accepted within the human-computer interaction (HCI) community. While exceptions exist, and alternative populations are sometimes studied, virtually any introduction to the process of designing user interfaces will discuss the importance of understanding the intended users as well as the significant impact individual differences can have on how effectively individuals can use various technologies. HCI researchers are expected to provide relevant demographics regarding study participants as well as information about experience using similar technologies. Yet in the field of accessibility, we continue to see studies that do not appropriately include representative users. Highlighting ways to remedy this multifaceted problem, we argue that expectations regarding how accessibility research is conducted and reported must be raised if this field is to have the desired impact with regard to inclusive design, the information technologies studied, and the lives of the individuals studied.",
author = "Sears, {Andrew L.} and Hanson, {Vicki L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1145/2141943.2141945",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing",
issn = "1936-7228",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
number = "2",

}

Representing users in accessibility research. / Sears, Andrew L.; Hanson, Vicki L.

In: ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, Vol. 4, No. 2, 7, 03.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Representing users in accessibility research

AU - Sears, Andrew L.

AU - Hanson, Vicki L.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - The need to study representative users is widely accepted within the human-computer interaction (HCI) community. While exceptions exist, and alternative populations are sometimes studied, virtually any introduction to the process of designing user interfaces will discuss the importance of understanding the intended users as well as the significant impact individual differences can have on how effectively individuals can use various technologies. HCI researchers are expected to provide relevant demographics regarding study participants as well as information about experience using similar technologies. Yet in the field of accessibility, we continue to see studies that do not appropriately include representative users. Highlighting ways to remedy this multifaceted problem, we argue that expectations regarding how accessibility research is conducted and reported must be raised if this field is to have the desired impact with regard to inclusive design, the information technologies studied, and the lives of the individuals studied.

AB - The need to study representative users is widely accepted within the human-computer interaction (HCI) community. While exceptions exist, and alternative populations are sometimes studied, virtually any introduction to the process of designing user interfaces will discuss the importance of understanding the intended users as well as the significant impact individual differences can have on how effectively individuals can use various technologies. HCI researchers are expected to provide relevant demographics regarding study participants as well as information about experience using similar technologies. Yet in the field of accessibility, we continue to see studies that do not appropriately include representative users. Highlighting ways to remedy this multifaceted problem, we argue that expectations regarding how accessibility research is conducted and reported must be raised if this field is to have the desired impact with regard to inclusive design, the information technologies studied, and the lives of the individuals studied.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859402565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859402565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/2141943.2141945

DO - 10.1145/2141943.2141945

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84859402565

VL - 4

JO - ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing

JF - ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing

SN - 1936-7228

IS - 2

M1 - 7

ER -