Reproducibility of motor unit number estimation in individual subjects

Zachary Simmons, David K. Epstein, Bryson Borg, David T. Mauger, Milind J. Kothari, Jeremy M. Shefner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the reproducibility of motor unit number estimation (MUNE) for groups of subjects has been studied, there is little such data for individuals. Prediction intervals represent a tool to study individual MUNE reproducibility and represent the range of values expected for a future MUNE if the true number of motor units remains unchanged. MUNE was performed using the statistical method on 48 normal individuals. The prediction interval was found to be a function of the intrasubject coefficient of variation. Using a commercial manufacturer's recommended technique and software, prediction intervals were found to be so broad as to be of uncertain value. We found that by averaging two MUNE observations for each determination, and using the method of weighted averages for calculating the size of an average single motor unit potential, the intrasubject coefficient of variation was reduced from 16.48% to 8.77%, and the 90% prediction interval became sufficiently narrow to be clinically useful. False-negative rates were also lowered substantially using these techniques. Thus, simple modifications of an existing MUNE program improved the clinical utility of this program for the longitudinal study of patients in whom changes in motor unit number over time are of importance, such as those with motor neuron diseases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)467-473
Number of pages7
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 10 2001

Fingerprint

Motor Neuron Disease
Longitudinal Studies
Software

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Simmons, Zachary ; Epstein, David K. ; Borg, Bryson ; Mauger, David T. ; Kothari, Milind J. ; Shefner, Jeremy M. / Reproducibility of motor unit number estimation in individual subjects. In: Muscle and Nerve. 2001 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 467-473.
@article{45d87848bf12437b9f83d67939c3e559,
title = "Reproducibility of motor unit number estimation in individual subjects",
abstract = "Although the reproducibility of motor unit number estimation (MUNE) for groups of subjects has been studied, there is little such data for individuals. Prediction intervals represent a tool to study individual MUNE reproducibility and represent the range of values expected for a future MUNE if the true number of motor units remains unchanged. MUNE was performed using the statistical method on 48 normal individuals. The prediction interval was found to be a function of the intrasubject coefficient of variation. Using a commercial manufacturer's recommended technique and software, prediction intervals were found to be so broad as to be of uncertain value. We found that by averaging two MUNE observations for each determination, and using the method of weighted averages for calculating the size of an average single motor unit potential, the intrasubject coefficient of variation was reduced from 16.48{\%} to 8.77{\%}, and the 90{\%} prediction interval became sufficiently narrow to be clinically useful. False-negative rates were also lowered substantially using these techniques. Thus, simple modifications of an existing MUNE program improved the clinical utility of this program for the longitudinal study of patients in whom changes in motor unit number over time are of importance, such as those with motor neuron diseases.",
author = "Zachary Simmons and Epstein, {David K.} and Bryson Borg and Mauger, {David T.} and Kothari, {Milind J.} and Shefner, {Jeremy M.}",
year = "2001",
month = "4",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1002/mus.1028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "467--473",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Reproducibility of motor unit number estimation in individual subjects. / Simmons, Zachary; Epstein, David K.; Borg, Bryson; Mauger, David T.; Kothari, Milind J.; Shefner, Jeremy M.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 24, No. 4, 10.04.2001, p. 467-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of motor unit number estimation in individual subjects

AU - Simmons, Zachary

AU - Epstein, David K.

AU - Borg, Bryson

AU - Mauger, David T.

AU - Kothari, Milind J.

AU - Shefner, Jeremy M.

PY - 2001/4/10

Y1 - 2001/4/10

N2 - Although the reproducibility of motor unit number estimation (MUNE) for groups of subjects has been studied, there is little such data for individuals. Prediction intervals represent a tool to study individual MUNE reproducibility and represent the range of values expected for a future MUNE if the true number of motor units remains unchanged. MUNE was performed using the statistical method on 48 normal individuals. The prediction interval was found to be a function of the intrasubject coefficient of variation. Using a commercial manufacturer's recommended technique and software, prediction intervals were found to be so broad as to be of uncertain value. We found that by averaging two MUNE observations for each determination, and using the method of weighted averages for calculating the size of an average single motor unit potential, the intrasubject coefficient of variation was reduced from 16.48% to 8.77%, and the 90% prediction interval became sufficiently narrow to be clinically useful. False-negative rates were also lowered substantially using these techniques. Thus, simple modifications of an existing MUNE program improved the clinical utility of this program for the longitudinal study of patients in whom changes in motor unit number over time are of importance, such as those with motor neuron diseases.

AB - Although the reproducibility of motor unit number estimation (MUNE) for groups of subjects has been studied, there is little such data for individuals. Prediction intervals represent a tool to study individual MUNE reproducibility and represent the range of values expected for a future MUNE if the true number of motor units remains unchanged. MUNE was performed using the statistical method on 48 normal individuals. The prediction interval was found to be a function of the intrasubject coefficient of variation. Using a commercial manufacturer's recommended technique and software, prediction intervals were found to be so broad as to be of uncertain value. We found that by averaging two MUNE observations for each determination, and using the method of weighted averages for calculating the size of an average single motor unit potential, the intrasubject coefficient of variation was reduced from 16.48% to 8.77%, and the 90% prediction interval became sufficiently narrow to be clinically useful. False-negative rates were also lowered substantially using these techniques. Thus, simple modifications of an existing MUNE program improved the clinical utility of this program for the longitudinal study of patients in whom changes in motor unit number over time are of importance, such as those with motor neuron diseases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035087459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035087459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mus.1028

DO - 10.1002/mus.1028

M3 - Article

C2 - 11268017

AN - SCOPUS:0035087459

VL - 24

SP - 467

EP - 473

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 4

ER -